Exploration of efficacy of different therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation in the first-line treatment

PURPOSE

The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response.

RESULTS

We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits.

Rapid, visual, label-based biosensor platform for identification of hepatitis C virus in clinical applications

OBJECTIVES

In the current study, for the first time, we reported a novel HCV molecular diagnostic approach termed reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification integrated with a gold nanoparticles-based lateral flow biosensor (RT-LAMP-AuNPs-LFB), which we developed for rapid, sensitive, specific, simple, and visual identification of HCV.

METHODS

A set of LAMP primer was designed according to 5'untranslated region (5'UTR) gene from the major HCV genotypes 1b, 2a, 3b, 6a, and 3a, which are prevalent in China. The HCV-RT-LAMP-AuNPs-LFB assay conditions, including HCV-RT-LAMP reaction temperature and time were optimized. The sensitivity, specificity, and selectivity of our assay were evaluated in the current study. The feasibility of HCV-RT-LAMP-AuNPs-LFB was confirmed through clinical serum samples from patients with suspected HCV infections.

RESULTS

An unique set of HCV-RT-LAMP primers were successfully designed targeting on the 5'UTR gene. The optimal detection process, including crude nucleic acid extraction (approximately 5 min), RT-LAMP reaction (67℃, 30 min), and visual interpretation of AuNPs-LFB results (~ 2 min), could be performed within 40 min without specific instruments. The limit of detection was determined to be 20 copies per test. The HCV-RT-LAMP-AuNPs-LFB assay exhibited high specificity and anti-interference.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results confirmed that the HCV-RT-LAMP-AuNPs-LFB assay is a sensitive, specific, rapid, visual, and cost-saving assay for identification of HCV. This diagnostic approach has great potential value for point-of-care (POC) diagnostic of HCV, especially in resource-challenged regions.

Efficacy of rechallenge immunotherapy after immune monotherapy resistance in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Drug resistance inevitably occurs despite the encouraging results of immunotherapy. This study attempted to investigate immunotherapy rechallenge treatment regimens and factors associated with outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to resistance status.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with advanced NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and immune rechallenge between March 2016 and December 2022. Primary resistance (RR) was defined by an absence of response after treatment administered for less than 6 months before progression. Acquired resistance (AR) was defined as a response to immunotherapy treatment administered for more than 6 months before progression. Disease progression in as many as three lesions was defined as systemic progression, whereas disease progression in fewer than three lesions was defined as oligo-progression.

RESULTS

Of 40 patients, 18 (45%) had primary resistance, and 22 (55%) developed AR. Overall survival (OS) was not reached. A significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in individuals rechallenged with ICIs after AR and RR (7.0 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.003). Patients receiving interval treatment before rechallenge achieved longer PFS than those who did not (6.2 months vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that systemic progression was a risk factor significantly associated with PFS after ICI rechallenge (P = 0.006). After AR, ICI rechallenge prolonged the duration of PFS if patients developed oligo-progression (5.4 months vs. 1.1 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ICI rechallenge is likely to be an option for patients with oligo-progression during rechallenge, particularly after AR.

Comparison of the immunotherapy efficacy between invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma in advanced lung cancer patients with KRAS mutation: a retrospective study

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma with unique clinical, radiological, and pathological features, among which KRAS mutation is the most common. However, the differences in the efficacy of immunotherapy between KRAS-positive IMA and invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) patients remain unclear. Patients with KRAS mutated adenocarcinomas receiving immunotherapy between June 2016 and December 2022 were enrolled. Based on mucin-producing status, the patients were placed into two subgroups: the IMA group and INMA group. Patients with IMA were further classified into two subtypes according to the presence of mucin patterns: pure IMA (≥ 90%) and mixed mucinous/nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (≥ 10% of each histological component). Kaplan-Meier Curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze survival. Cox regression analysis of PFS were used to analyze the independent factors associated with efficacy. Sixty-five advanced adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS mutations received immunotherapy, including 24 patients with IMA and 41 with INMA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months. Significant difference in PFS could be observed in IMA and INMA (3.5 months vs. 8.9 months; P = 0.047). Patients with pure IMA tended toward prolonger survival in contrast to mixed mucinous/nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in PFS (8.4 months vs. 2.3 months; P = 0.349). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that IMA was an independent risk factor for PFS. In KRAS mutated patients, IMA was associated with poorer PFS after immunotherapy compared with INMA.