Understanding and responding to racism and the provision of culturally safe care by interdisciplinary health professionals in the aged care sector in regional, rural and remote areas: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

This scoping review was undertaken to obtain conceptual clarification about how racism and cultural safety are understood by interdisciplinary health professionals globally in the aged care sector in regional, rural and remote areas. There is evidence in Australia and internationally that racism is a factor impacting significantly on the health of First Peoples and other racialised minorities. Recent policy changes in Australia have required health professionals to integrate cultural safety into their practice to mitigate racism and improve the health of older First Nations Australians and older people from diverse ethnic and cultural groups.

METHODS

This review consisted of literature published in English from 1990, including published primary studies; systematic, integrative and narrative reviews; meta-analyses; theses; policy documents; guidelines; position statements; and government literature. Ovid (MEDLINE), CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Scopus, Proquest Nursing and Allied Health Database, and Informit were used in the full search. The most recent search of all databases was undertaken on 9 May 2022. Ten papers were included in the review, following the exclusion of 376 papers. A title and abstract search of the reference lists of papers included in the review identified no additional papers.

RESULTS

Ten papers were included in the review from Australia, Canada, the US, Norway and England. The literature reviewed suggests that health professionals in the aged care sector in regional, rural and remote areas in Australia, Canada, the US, Norway and England use alternative terms to 'racism' and 'racist', such as 'institutional marginalisation'.

DISCUSSION

The absence of explicit reference to racism aligns with critical race research that argues implicit bias and institutional racism are often separated from an individualised understanding of racism. That is, practitioners may understand racism as something that is perpetrated by individuals in an otherwise 'neutral' health setting. There is also a lack of clarity on how culturally safe care is understood, even though individual care plans are viewed as instrumental in establishing the needs and preferences of the consumers. Within the literature surveyed, barriers to providing quality and culturally inclusive care include disengaged management, insufficient human and material resources, language barriers and a lack of education focused on the needs of older individuals and groups with various cultural and spiritual needs. Additionally, the review does not clearly illuminate what health professionals understand to be racist thinking or behaviour and how it is responded to in practice. Likewise, there is limited information about health professionals' understanding of cultural safety and how to provide culturally inclusive care.

CONCLUSION

While work is beginning on developing standards for cultural safety training in an Australian context, there are also opportunities to consider how these should be applied or adapted to residential and community aged care to best meet the needs of a diverse consumer base and workforce.

Accessing voluntary assisted dying in regional Western Australia: early reflections from key stakeholders

INTRODUCTION

Most Australian jurisdictions have passed voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws, with some regimes already in operation. Inequitable access to assisted dying in regional communities has been described internationally. Although regional access to VAD has been identified as a concern in Australia, to date it has been understudied empirically. Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to pass and implement VAD laws. Due to the vast geography of WA (and the potential for such geography to exacerbate regional access inequities) several initiatives were introduced to try to mitigate such inequities. This article aims to explore the effectiveness of these initiatives, and report on regional provision of VAD in WA more generally, by drawing on the early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders.

METHODS

A total of 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 participants belonging to four main stakeholder groups: patients and families, health practitioners, regulators and VAD system personnel, and health and professional organisation representatives. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Data analysis led to the description of four main themes: the importance of the Regional Access Support Scheme, the need for local providers, the role of telehealth in VAD provision and the impact of distance.

CONCLUSION

Early experiences and reflections of key stakeholders suggest that while many of the regional initiatives implemented by WA are largely effective in addressing regional access inequities, challenges for regional VAD provision and access remain.

Facilitating regional and remote access to voluntary assisted dying in Western Australia: targeted initiatives during the law-making and implementation stages of reform

Australians living in regional and remote communities face several barriers when accessing high quality health care. Voluntary assisted dying (VAD), a new and sensitive end-of-life option, presents a new challenge for residents living in these communities. Western Australia (WA) is the second Australian state to implement VAD laws and, to date, is the jurisdiction with the greatest need to address access inequities in regional and remote communities due to its vast area. This article identifies and explores initiatives introduced by the WA Government to address regional and remote access inequities in each of the two stages of the reform process: the stage of the reform process leading up to passing the law ('law-making stage'), and the stage of the reform process after the law was passed and prior to it commencing operation ('implementation stage'). The analysis reveals that several initiatives were implemented during each of the law-making and implementation stages of reform. Initiatives introduced in the law-making stage through inclusion in the legislation itself included dedicated guiding principles promoting equality of access for regional and remote residents, broadened qualification requirements for medical practitioners who can participate in VAD, allowing nurse practitioner administration, and mandating that statistics relating to regional and remote access are recorded and reported. Other initiatives dedicated to facilitating regional and remote access were not specifically provided for by legislation but were introduced during the implementation stage of the reform process. These include the establishment of a Statewide Care Navigator Service that administers a Regional Access Support Scheme and ensuring that the Statewide Pharmacy Service is accessible to regional and remote residents. Other initiatives intended to facilitate regional and remote access were provided for in legislation but given further content during the implementation stage. These include an access standard (contents determined by the CEO during implementation) and telehealth (supporting guidance around lawful use issued by the WA Government during implementation). This policy report reveals that WA took a considered and targeted focus to address regional and remote access in both the law-making and implementation stages of reform. Given VAD in WA is still in the early stages of its operation, it is too soon to determine how effective these initiatives have been in promoting regional and remote access to VAD in WA. Careful evaluation of these initiatives will be crucial to monitor their effectiveness and to assess whether additional measures are needed. Reflecting on the WA experience will also be valuable for other states as they legalise VAD and develop (and adapt) their own access initiatives.

The Effect of ShotBlocker on Pain and Patient Satisfaction for Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

During spinal anesthesia, patients may experience pain and discomfort associated with dermal puncture. It may also cause involuntary movement, which often disturbs the patient's posture thus affecting the success of spinal anesthesia. Different methods have been studied to cope with needle-related pain. "ShotBlocker" is a flexible, plastic, U-shaped device, which has several blunt points. It is suggested that blunt points provide a nonnoxious physical stimulation and inhibit the transmission of injection pain.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the ShotBlocker for dermal puncture pain during spinal anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

University hospital, operating room.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients aged 18 to 65 years with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to either a ShotBlocker (n = 47) or control group (n = 47). In the ShotBlocker group, lumbar punctures were performed with the application of ShotBlocker. Needle-associated pain score and patient satisfaction were assessed by the patient, immediately after completion of the spinal anesthesia using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and a 5-point Likert scale for satisfaction. Patients were also closely observed for symptoms of discomfort such as spontaneous vocalization and involuntary movement.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in VAS scores, patient satisfaction, or procedure time between groups (P > 0.05). Spontaneous vocalization did not occur in both groups. However, incidence of unintentional movement during dermal puncture was higher in the control group (6.8% vs. 31.8%; P < 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

Study was conducted in a single-center with a relatively small population of patients. Only the attending anesthetist collecting data was blinded to the procedure. Patients older than age 65 years were also excluded from the study, thus our results cannot be generalized.

CONCLUSIONS

ShotBlocker did not show any advantage on VAS scores but decreased the incidence of unintentional movement during dermal puncture.

National study of the impact of rural immersion programs on intended location of medical practice in New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

New Zealand (NZ) faces an ongoing shortage of rural medical professionals. In an effort to increase interest in rural practice, both of the medical schools in NZ offer rural immersion programs as well as rural entry pathways. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of long (>33-week) rural immersion with a short (5-week interprofessional) rural immersion or no rural immersion on the career location intentions of NZ medical students.

METHODS

This observational study used linked data from the Commencing Medical Students Questionnaire (CMSQ) and Exit Questionnaire (EQ), collected between 2011 and 2017 as part of the Medical Schools Outcomes Database project, along with information on whether or not a student undertook a rural immersion program. The main outcome measure was EQ career location intention (Rural (population 100 000)). The explanatory variables were rural immersion (long, short, none), age, ethnicity, background, CMSQ career location intention, gender, specialisation preferences and interest in rural medicine. In addition to univariate analysis, data were used to build a multinomial model to determine relative associations of these variables with the outcome.

RESULTS

Full data were available for 1367 NZ medical students (47% of all students during the time period). Of these, 17.4% had undertaken a long or short rural immersion program. In univariate analysis, age was the only variable that did not significantly predict EQ rural intention outcome. In the multivariate model, rural immersion was a significant independent predictor of EQ career location intention. Students taking a long rural immersion were 6.4 and 4.4 times more likely to select a Rural or Regional intention, respectively, than those with no rural immersion. This strong effect on rural intentions was seen regardless of background. CMSQ career location intention, background, ethnicity, rural club membership and preference for general practice were also significant predictors. While short rural immersion did not have an independent effect, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the smaller number of students and the response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Long rural immersion is highly beneficial for increasing interest in rural work, increasing the likelihood that medical students will intend to work outside an urban setting. Students who signal an early rural intention are strong candidates for such programs later in their course, regardless of their background. A three-category classification for geographic background and career location intention permitted a more detailed understanding of the interplay among demographic variables and rural immersion in influencing career intentions. Following cohorts into their postgraduate years is needed to ascertain if these career location intentions persist.