A Pilot Study of 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI for Biopsy Guidance in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

Targeting of lesions seen on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) improves prostate cancer (PC) detection at biopsy. However, 20%-65% of highly suspicious lesions on mpMRI (PI-RADS [Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System] 4 or 5) are false-positives (FPs), while 5%-10% of clinically significant PC (csPC) are missed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are both overexpressed in PC. We therefore aimed to evaluate the potential of 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI for biopsy guidance in patients with suspected PC. Methods: A highly selective cohort of 13 men, aged 58.0 ± 7.1 y, with suspected PC (persistently high prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA density) but negative or equivocal mpMRI results or negative biopsy were prospectively enrolled to undergo 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI. PET/MRI included whole-body and dedicated pelvic imaging after a delay of 20 min. All patients had targeted biopsy of any lesions seen on PET followed by standard 12-core biopsy. The SUVmax of suspected PC lesions was collected and compared with gold standard biopsy. Results: PSA and PSA density at enrollment were 9.8 ± 6.0 (range, 1.5-25.5) ng/mL and 0.20 ± 0.18 (range, 0.06-0.68) ng/mL2, respectively. Standardized systematic biopsy revealed a total of 14 PCs in 8 participants: 7 were csPC and 7 were nonclinically significant PC (ncsPC). 68Ga-PSMA11 identified 25 lesions, of which 11 (44%) were true-positive (TP) (5 csPC). 68Ga-RM2 showed 27 lesions, of which 14 (52%) were TP, identifying all 7 csPC and also 7 ncsPC. There were 17 concordant lesions in 11 patients versus 14 discordant lesions in 7 patients between 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET. Incongruent lesions had the highest rate of FP (12 FP vs. 2 TP). SUVmax was significantly higher for TP than FP lesions in delayed pelvic imaging for 68Ga-PSMA11 (6.49 ± 4.14 vs. 4.05 ± 1.55, P = 0.023) but not for whole-body images, nor for 68Ga-RM2. Conclusion: Our results show that 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI are feasible for biopsy guidance in suspected PC. Both radiopharmaceuticals detected additional clinically significant cancers not seen on mpMRI in this selective cohort. 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI identified all csPC confirmed at biopsy.

Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

⁶⁸Ga-RM2 targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs), which are overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC). Here, we compared preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET to postsurgery histopathology in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk PC. Methods: Forty-one men, 64.0 ± 6.7 y old, were prospectively enrolled. PET images were acquired 42-72 min (median ± SD, 52.5 ± 6.5 min) after injection of 118.4-247.9 MBq (median ± SD, 138.0 ± 22.2 MBq) of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2. PET findings were compared with preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) (n = 36) and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET (n = 17) and correlated to postprostatectomy whole-mount histopathology (n = 32) and time to biochemical recurrence. Nine participants decided to undergo radiation therapy after study enrollment. Results: All participants had intermediate- (n = 17) or high-risk (n = 24) PC and were scheduled for prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen was 8.8 ± 77.4 (range, 2.5-504) and 7.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL (range, 2.5-28.0 ng/mL) when participants who ultimately underwent radiation treatment were excluded. Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 70 intraprostatic foci of uptake in 40 of 41 patients. Postprostatectomy histopathology was available in 32 patients in which ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 50 of 54 intraprostatic lesions (detection rate = 93%). ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake was recorded in 19 nonenlarged pelvic lymph nodes in 6 patients. Pathology confirmed lymph node metastases in 16 lesions, and follow-up imaging confirmed nodal metastases in 2 lesions. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 27 and 26 intraprostatic lesions, respectively, and 5 pelvic lymph nodes each in 17 patients. Concordance between ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET was found in 18 prostatic lesions in 11 patients and 4 lymph nodes in 2 patients. Noncongruent findings were observed in 6 patients (intraprostatic lesions in 4 patients and nodal lesions in 2 patients). Sensitivity and accuracy rates for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (98% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and 95% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11) were higher than those for mpMRI (77% and 77%, respectively). Specificity was highest for mpMRI with 75% followed by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (67%) and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (65%). Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET accurately detects intermediate- and high-risk primary PC, with a detection rate of 93%. In addition, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET showed significantly higher specificity and accuracy than mpMRI and a performance similar to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies to identify which patients will benefit from one or the other or both radiopharmaceuticals.

PSMA- and GRPR-Targeted PET: Results from 50 Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Novel radiopharmaceuticals for PET are being evaluated for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PC). We compared the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-targeting ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 with the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL. Methods: Fifty patients underwent both ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (n = 23) or ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (n = 27) PET/CT at an interval ranging from 1 to 60 d (mean ± SD, 15.8 ± 17.7 d). SUV_max was collected for all lesions. Results: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET was positive in 35 and negative in 15 of the 50 patients. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET was positive in 37 and negative in 13 of the 50 patients. Both scans detected 70 lesions in 32 patients. Forty-three lesions in 18 patients were identified on only 1 scan: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 detected 7 more lesions in 4 patients, whereas ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL detected 36 more lesions in 13 patients. Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 remains a valuable radiopharmaceutical even when compared with the more widely used ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL in the evaluation of BCR of PC. Larger studies are needed to verify that identifying patients for whom these 2 classes of radiopharmaceuticals are complementary may ultimately allow for personalized medicine.

Comparison of 3 Interpretation Criteria for 68Ga-PSMA11 PET Based on Inter- and Intrareader Agreement

PET using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is now being more widely adopted as a valuable tool to evaluate patients with prostate cancer (PC). Recently, 3 different criteria for interpretation of PSMA PET were published: the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) criteria, the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation criteria, and the PSMA Reporting and Data System. We compared these 3 criteria in terms of interreader, intrareader, and intercriteria agreement. Methods: Data from 104 patients prospectively enrolled in research protocols at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort consisted of 2 groups: 47 patients (mean age, 64.2 y old) who underwent Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[⁶⁸Ga(HBED-CC)] (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11) PET/MRI for initial staging of biopsy-proven intermediate- or high-risk PC, and 57 patients (mean age, 70.5 y old) who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT because of biochemically recurrent PC. Three nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated all ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/MRI and PET/CT studies according to the 3 interpretation criteria. Two of them reevaluated all studies 6 mo later in the same manner and masked to the initial reading. The Gwet agreement coefficient was calculated to evaluate interreader, intrareader, and intercriteria agreement based on the following sites: local lesion (primary tumor or prostate bed after radical prostatectomy), lymph node metastases, and other metastases. Results: In the PET/MRI group, interreader, intrareader, and intercriteria agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect for any site according to all 3 criteria. In the PET/CT group, interreader agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect except for judgment of distant metastases based on the PSMA Reporting and Data System (Gwet agreement coefficient, 0.57; moderate agreement), in which the most frequent cause of disagreement was lung nodules. Intrareader agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect for any site according to all 3 criteria. Intercriteria agreement for each site was also substantial to almost perfect. Conclusion: Although the 3 published criteria have good interreader and intrareader reproducibility in evaluating ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET, there are some factors causing interreader disagreement. Further work is needed to address this issue.