Prognostic factors for long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. A retrospective cohort study

Background

Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAAC) had a poor prognosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains the only potentially curative treatment. The study aimed to identify the impact of different clinicopathological factors on long-term survival following PD for PAAC.

Patients and methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study for the patients who underwent PD for pathologically proven PAAC from January 2010 to January 2019. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression multivariate analyses for independent risk factors for survival.

Result

There were 137 patients with PAAC who underwent PD, 79 patients (57.7%) underwent pylorus-preserving PD. Pancreatico-jejunostomy was done in 108 patients (78.8%). The primary analysis showed that risk factors for poor long-term survival include patients with co-morbidities like hypertension or ischemic heart disease, Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 > 400U/ml, tumor size > 3 cm, poor tumor differentiation, positive lymph nodes invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and Perineural invasion. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that large tumor size > 3 cm (HR: 0.177, 95%CI: 0.084-0.374, P = 0.002), poorly differentiated tumor (HR: 0.059, 95%CI: 0.020-0.0174, P = 0.016), and perineural invasion in the pathological study (HR: 0.101, 95%CI: 0.046-0.224, P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for poor 5-years survival. The prognosis was better in ampullary adenocarcinoma (5-year survival was 42.1%) than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (5-year survival was 24.3%). The 1, 3, 5 and 7-year overall survival rates were 84.5%, 57.4%, 35.9% and 20.1% respectively.

Conclusion

It seems from the current study that Tumor size > 3 cm, poor tumor differentiation, and Perineural invasion were independent predictors of poor survival in patients with PAAC.

Prognostic factors for long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. A retrospective cohort study

Background

Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAAC) had a poor prognosis, and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains the only potentially curative treatment. The study aimed to identify the impact of different clinicopathological factors on long-term survival following PD for PAAC.

Patients and methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study for the patients who underwent PD for pathologically proven PAAC from January 2010 to January 2019. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression multivariate analyses for independent risk factors for survival.

Result

There were 137 patients with PAAC who underwent PD, 79 patients (57.7%) underwent pylorus-preserving PD. Pancreatico-jejunostomy was done in 108 patients (78.8%). The primary analysis showed that risk factors for poor long-term survival include patients with co-morbidities like hypertension or ischemic heart disease, Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 > 400U/ml, tumor size > 3 cm, poor tumor differentiation, positive lymph nodes invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and Perineural invasion. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that large tumor size > 3 cm (HR: 0.177, 95%CI: 0.084–0.374, P = 0.002), poorly differentiated tumor (HR: 0.059, 95%CI: 0.020–0.0174, P = 0.016), and perineural invasion in the pathological study (HR: 0.101, 95%CI: 0.046–0.224, P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for poor 5-years survival. The prognosis was better in ampullary adenocarcinoma (5-year survival was 42.1%) than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (5-year survival was 24.3%). The 1, 3, 5 and 7-year overall survival rates were 84.5%, 57.4%, 35.9% and 20.1% respectively.

Conclusion

It seems from the current study that Tumor size > 3 cm, poor tumor differentiation, and Perineural invasion were independent predictors of poor survival in patients with PAAC.

•

Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAAC) is highly aggressive tumor.

•

It has late diagnosis with poor prognosis.

•

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still the only curative treatment option.

•

PD surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

•

It is important to determine which patients who can receive benefit from surgery.