1
|
Duseja A, Singh S, De A, Madan K, Rao PN, Shukla A, Choudhuri G, Saigal S, Shalimar, Arora A, Anand AC, Das A, Kumar A, Eapen CE, Devadas K, Shenoy KT, Panigrahi M, Wadhawan M, Rathi M, Kumar M, Choudhary NS, Saraf N, Nath P, Kar S, Alam S, Shah S, Nijhawan S, Acharya SK, Aggarwal V, Saraswat VA, Chawla YK. Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance Paper on Nomenclature, Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). J Clin Exp Hepatol 2023; 13:273-302. [PMID: 36950481 PMCID: PMC10025685 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major cause of chronic liver disease globally and in India. The already high burden of NAFLD in India is expected to further increase in the future in parallel with the ongoing epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given the high prevalence of NAFLD in the community, it is crucial to identify those at risk of progressive liver disease to streamline referral and guide proper management. Existing guidelines on NAFLD by various international societies fail to capture the entire landscape of NAFLD in India and are often difficult to incorporate in clinical practice due to fundamental differences in sociocultural aspects and health infrastructure available in India. A lot of progress has been made in the field of NAFLD in the 7 years since the initial position paper by the Indian National Association for the Study of Liver on NAFLD in 2015. Further, the ongoing debate on the nomenclature of NAFLD is creating undue confusion among clinical practitioners. The ensuing comprehensive review provides consensus-based, guidance statements on the nomenclature, diagnosis, and treatment of NAFLD that are practically implementable in the Indian setting.
Collapse
Key Words
- AASLD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- ALD, alcohol-associated liver disease
- ALT, alanine aminotransferase
- APRI, AST-platelet ratio index
- AST, aspartate aminotransferase
- BMI, body mass index
- CAP, controlled attenuation parameter
- CHB, chronic Hepatitis B
- CHC, chronic Hepatitis C
- CK-18, Cytokeratin-18
- CKD, chronic kidney disease
- CRN, Clinical Research Network
- CVD, cardiovascular disease
- DAFLD/DASH, dual etiology fatty liver disease or steatohepatitis
- EBMT, endoscopic bariatric metabolic therapy
- ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis
- FAST, FibroScan-AST
- FIB-4, fibrosis-4
- FLIP, fatty liver inhibition of progression
- FXR, farnesoid X receptor
- GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- INASL, Indian National Association for Study of the Liver
- LAI, liver attenuation index
- LSM, liver stiffness measurement
- MAFLD
- MAFLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
- MR-PDFF, magnetic resonance – proton density fat fraction
- MRE, magnetic resonance elastography
- MetS, metabolic syndrome
- NAFL:, nonalcoholic fatty liver
- NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
- NAS, NAFLD activity score
- NASH
- NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
- NCD, noncommunicable diseases
- NCPF, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis
- NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score
- NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- NPCDCS, National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke
- OCA, obeticholic acid
- PPAR, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
- PTMS, post-transplant metabolic syndrome
- SAF, steatosis, activity, and fibrosis
- SGLT-2, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2
- SWE, shear wave elastography
- T2DM, DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus
- USG, ultrasound
- VAT, visceral adipose tissue
- VCTE, vibration controlled transient elastography
- fatty liver
- hepatic steatosis
- nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Duseja
- Departmentof Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - S.P. Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, India
| | - Arka De
- Departmentof Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Kaushal Madan
- Max Centre for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Hospitals, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Padaki Nagaraja Rao
- Department of Hepatology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Akash Shukla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Gourdas Choudhuri
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepato-Biliary Sciences, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Max Centre for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Hospitals, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreatico-Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil C. Anand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Ashim Das
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Institute of Liver, Gastroenterology and Pancreatico-Biliary Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Krishnadas Devadas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, India
| | | | - Manas Panigrahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Manav Wadhawan
- Institute of Liver & Digestive Diseases, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Manish Rathi
- Department of Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Neeraj Saraf
- Department of Hepatology, Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Preetam Nath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Sanjib Kar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gastro Liver Care, Cuttack, India
| | - Seema Alam
- Department of PediatricHepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Samir Shah
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Sandeep Nijhawan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, India
| | - Subrat K. Acharya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Vinayak Aggarwal
- Department of Cardiology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India
| | - Vivek A. Saraswat
- Department of Hepatology, Pancreatobiliary Sciences and Liver Transplantation, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Jaipur, India
| | - Yogesh K. Chawla
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The diagnostic assessment of liver injury is an important step in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although liver biopsy is the reference standard for the assessment of necroinflammation and fibrosis, the inherent limitations of an invasive procedure, and need for repeat sampling, have led to the development of several non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to liver biopsy. Such non-invasive approaches mostly include biological (serum biomarker algorithms) or physical (imaging assessment of tissue stiffness) assessments. However, currently available NITs have several limitations, such as variability, inadequate accuracy and risk factors for error, while the development of a newer generation of biomarkers for fibrosis may be limited by the sampling error inherent to the reference standard. Many of the current NITs were initially developed to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, subsequently refined for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and further adapted for prognostication in CLD. An important consideration is that despite their increased use in clinical practice, these NITs were not designed to reflect the dynamic process of fibrogenesis, differentiate between adjacent disease stages, diagnose non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or follow longitudinal changes in fibrosis or disease activity caused by natural history or therapeutic intervention. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these NITs will allow for more judicious interpretation in the clinical context, where NITs should be viewed as complementary to, rather than as a replacement for, liver biopsy.
Collapse
Key Words
- AGA, American Gastroenterology Association
- ALT, alanine aminotransferase
- APRI, AST-platelet ratio index
- AST, aspartate aminotransferase
- AUC, area under the curve
- BMI, body mass index
- Biomarkers
- CAP, controlled attenuation parameter
- CHB, chronic hepatitis B
- CHC, chronic hepatitis C
- CLD, chronic liver disease
- CPA, collagen proportionate area
- DAA, direct-acting antiviral
- ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis
- Elastography
- FIB-4, fibrosis-4
- FLIP, fatty liver inhibition of progression
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- IFN, interferon
- LSM, liver stiffness measure
- Liver biopsy
- MR, magnetic resonance
- MRE, magnetic resonance elastography
- NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- NFS, NAFLD fibrosis score
- NITs, non-invasive tests
- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- SVR, sustained virologic response
- US, ultrasound
- VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography
- Viral hepatitis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyur Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Corresponding author. Address: Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 9EN, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4.
| | - Giada Sebastiani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|