Clinical Characteristics of an Italian Patient Population with Advanced BCC and Real-Life Evaluation of Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Safety and Effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) represents a complex and clinically heterogeneous group of lesions for which curative surgery and/or radiotherapy is unlikely. Systemic therapy with hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) changed the treatment landscape for this complex patient population.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study are to describe the clinical characteristics of a real-life Italian cohort diagnosed with aBCC and to investigate effectiveness and safety of HHI.

METHODS

A multicenter observational study was performed by twelve Italian centers in the period January 1, 2016 - October 15, 2022. Patients aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with aBCC (locally advanced [laBCC] and metastatic BCC [mBCC]) were eligible for the study. Methods for investigating tumor response to HHI included clinical and dermatoscopic evaluation, radiological imaging, and histopathology. For HHI safety assessment, therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were reported and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

RESULTS

We enrolled 178 patients under treatment with HHI: 126 (70.8%) and 52 patients (29.2%) received sonidegib and vismodegib, respectively. Comprehensive data on HHI effectiveness and disease outcome were available for 132 (74.1%) of 178 patients: 129 patients had a diagnosis of laBCC (n = 84, sonidegib; n = 45, vismodegib) and 3 patients of mBCC (n = 2, vismodegib; n = 1, sonidegib, off-label). Objective response rate was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-68.7) and 33.3% (95% CI: 88.2-1.7) for laBCC (complete response [CR]: 43/129; PR: 56/129) and mBCC (CR: 0/3; PR: 1/3), respectively. High-risk aBCC histopathological subtypes and occurrence of >2 therapy-related AEs were significantly associated with nonresponse to HHI therapy ([OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.09-6.05; p: 0.03] and [OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.03-7.9; p: 0.04]), respectively. Majority of our cohort (54.5%) developed at least 1 therapy-related AE, most of which were mild-moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and safety profile of HHI and confirm the reproducibility of pivotal trial results in real-life clinical setting.

Real-World Experience with Vismodegib on Advanced and Multiple BCCs: Data from the RELIVIS Study

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib is approved for advanced cases of basal cell carcinomas not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy. Large studies on the use of vismodegib in clinical practice are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the study was to analyse the evolution and therapeutic management of relapses and lack of response in patients who had received vismodegib for locally advanced and/or multiple basal cell carcinomas in a real-life multicentre setting.

METHODS

This nationwide retrospective study collected data on patients treated with vismodegib in 15 specialized centres. We included patients who first received vismodegib until intolerable toxicity, maximum response, or progressive disease. Exploratory research variables referred to patient and tumour characteristics, vismodegib effectiveness and safety, relapse rate and management, and mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of complete clinical response.

RESULTS

133 patients with advanced BCC were included in the registry. The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.5% and nearly half of the patients (45.9%) achieved complete remission. Long-term information and detailed information of subsequent treatments after a regime of vismodegib was available for 115 patients. Only 34% of the patients in this group were subsequently treated with other therapies or vismodegib rechallenge. Sixty-nine percent of the patients who had shown a complete remission with vismodegib remained free of recurrence while 30.7% relapsed. Almost half of the patients who received additional therapies after the first course of vismodegib achieved complete tumour remission. Three and 2 out of 9 patients who were rechallenged with vismodegib achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, with an ORR of 55.5%.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms efficacy of vismodegib in routine clinical practice. The risk of recurrence after achieving complete response with vismodegib was lower than previous reports. Rechallenge with vismodegib is feasible and most patients responded to re-treatment.

Traitement médical des carcinomes basocellulaires avancés: Medical treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma

Until recently, advanced BCC were only accessible to a highly morbid surgery not necessarily proving to be carcinologic, and leaving terrible dysmorphic sequelae hard to accept by the patient. Another possibility, the only one in case of metastatic BCC, was chemotherapy which efficacy has never been proven in a clinical trial. Radiotherapy is most often not accessible because of previous radiotherapy or because of the localization or the extension of the lesion. The discovery of the importance of the sonic hedgehog pathway in the physiopathology of BCC has opened a new strategy with the development of targeted anti SMO drugs inactivating the pathway. Two molecules have become available following Phase I and II studies: vismodegib (Erivedge®) the first in class indicated for locally advanced and metastatic BCC and sonidegib (Odomzo®) indicated only for locally advanced BCC. The pharmacokinetic profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib showed several differences. No head to head comparative studies are available between these two drugs. Their pivotal phase II studies had similar study designs and endpoints. The objective response rate (ORR) by central review for vismodegib was 47.6% (95% CI 35.5-60.6) at 21 months follow-up. The ORR for sonidegib according to central review at 18 months follow-up is 56.1% (95% CI 43.3-68.3). Although both treatments share a similar adverse event profile with possible numerically differences in incidence, most patients will discontinue hedgehog inhibitors treatment in the long term because of side effects. Some resistant cases to these drugs have been described but are rather rare. In case of resistance or bad tolerability to the drug future hopes rely on immunotherapy currently under investigation. © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Prise en charge des carcinomes basocellulaires difficiles à traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Sun Pharma.