Aseptic meningitis after amenamevir treatment for herpes zoster ophthalmicus with oculomotor nerve palsy in a patient taking immunosuppressant

A 79-year-old woman presented with vomiting after being prescribed amenamevir by her primary care physician. She had a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and was administered prednisolone and methotrexate. She was finally diagnosed with herpes zoster ophthalmicus and aseptic meningitis, and intravenous antiviral therapy was initiated. However, the patient developed oculomotor nerve palsy on the 11th day of hospitalization. In this case, there was a time lag between the administration of antiviral drugs and clinical improvement. Our case suggests the necessity of selecting antivirals, especially in high-risk cases of CNS complications, to avoid the low intracerebral transferability of antiviral drugs, including amenamevir.

Current scenario and future applicability of antivirals against herpes zoster

Herpes zoster (HZ) is a common disease in the aging population and immunocompromised individuals, with a lifetime risk of 20%-30% that increases with age. HZ is caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which remains latent in the spinal dorsal root ganglia and cranial sensory ganglia after resolution of the primary VZV infection. The main focus of HZ management is rapid recovery from VZV infection as well as the reduction and prevention of zoster-associated pain (ZAP) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). The use of antivirals against VZV is essential in the treatment of HZ. However, limited antivirals are only licensed clinically for the treatment of HZ, including acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir, brivudine, and amenamevir. Fortunately, some new antivirals against different types of Herpesviridae have been investigated and suggested as novel drugs against VZV. Therefore, this review focuses on discussing the difference in efficacy and safety in the currently licensed antivirals for the treatment of HZ, the applicability of future novel antivirals against VZV, and the preventive or therapeutic effects of these antivirals on ZAP or PHN.

A 1-Year Survey of Zoster-Associated Pain after Amenamevir Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Amenamevir is a new anti-varicella-zoster virus drug that inhibits the helicase-primase complex involved in viral replication. Amenamevir has the same effect as valaciclovir on acute pain and skin eruption, but no studies have examined the presence of long-term zoster-associated pain (ZAP) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after amenamevir treatment.

METHODS

A total of 785 herpes zoster patients treated with amenamevir were followed up for 12 months. Patients recorded their pain status on a questionnaire once a month.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with pain was 20.8% at 90 days, 8.0% at 180 days, 3.8% at 270 days, and 2.7% at 360 days after treatment. The median residual pain duration was 48 days. ZAP resolution rate slowed between 90 and 120 days, suggesting that the main feature of ZAP is a shift from nociceptive pain to neuropathic pain. Older age and more severe skin symptoms at the first visit were associated with a higher risk of developing PHN. Median ZAP duration was high for the head, face, and upper back and chest. Regarding the nature of pain, sudden pain attacks that felt like electric shocks, sensation of numbness, burning sensation, and cold/heat pain tended to remain as PHN.

CONCLUSIONS

Although conclusions must remain tentative without further comparative studies, amenamevir seems to have a similar effect on PHN as conventional nucleoside analogs, despite having a different action mechanism.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000035938.

Pharmacokinetics and Dialyzability of a Single Oral Dose of Amenamevir, an Anti-Herpes Drug, in Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

Amenamevir (ASP2151), a herpesvirus helicase-primase inhibitor, is currently used for the treatment of herpes zoster in Japan. Amenamevir is mainly metabolized in the liver, and urinary excretion of amenamevir is approximately 10% in healthy adults. The increase of systemic exposure in non-dialysis patients with severe renal impairment was much less than that associated with nucleoside antiviral agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and dialyzability of a single oral dose (400 mg) of amenamevir in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

This was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter clinical pharmacology study. Nine patients aged 20–80 years with end-stage kidney disease and undergoing maintenance hemodialysis three times weekly were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics and dialyzability were investigated by serial collection of blood samples until 48 h post-dose during the study.

Results

The maximum plasma concentration and time to reach maximum plasma concentration during 24 h post-dose were 1585 ng/mL and 6.2 h, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 h was 23,890 ng h/mL. The median terminal elimination half-life within 24 h before, during, and after hemodialysis was 14.7, 15.2, and 12.4 h, respectively. The AUC in hemodialysis patients was approximately double that in healthy adults. This increase in AUC was much less than that reported in nucleoside antiviral agents. The hemodialysis clearance, elimination fraction percentage, and amount of amenamevir removed were 37.8 mL/min, 28.1%, and 132.0 μg, respectively. The amount of amenamevir removed by hemodialysis was minimal. None of the hemodialysis parameters were associated with serum albumin. This study revealed no clinically relevant safety concerns.

Conclusion

There were no clinically relevant safety concerns when 400 mg of amenamevir was administered as a single dose to hemodialysis patients without dose adjustment and/or modification of the dosing schedule.

Trial Registration

JapicCTI-184242.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01375-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Viral ribonucleotide reductase attenuates the anti-herpes activity of acyclovir in contrast to amenamevir

Amenamevir is a helicase-primase inhibitor of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and is used for the treatment of herpes zoster in Japan. The half maximal effective concentrations (EC₅₀s) of acyclovir and sorivudine for VZV increased as the time of treatment was delayed from 6 to 18 h after infection, while those of amenamevir and foscarnet were not affected. Susceptibility of infected cells at 0 and 18 h after infection was examined with four anti-herpes drugs, and the fold increases in EC₅₀ for acyclovir, sorivudine, amenamevir, and foscarnet were 13.1, 6.3, 1.3, and 1.0, respectively. The increase in the EC₅₀s for acyclovir in the late phase of infection in VZV and HSV was abolished by hydroxyurea, a ribonucleotide reductase (RR) inhibitor. The common mechanism affecting antiviral activities of acyclovir to HSV and VZV was examined in HSV-infected cells. The amount of HSV DNA in cells treated with amenamevir at 10 x EC₅₀ was similar at 0 and 12 h but less than that in cells treated with acyclovir at 10 x EC₅₀. dGTP, produced through viral RR, peaked at 4 h and decreased thereafter as it was consumed by viral DNA synthesis. Because acyclovir and amenamevir inhibited viral DNA synthesis, thus making dGTP unnecessary, dGTP was significantly more abundant in the presence of acyclovir and amenamevir than in untreated, infected cells. Abundant dGTP supplied by RR may compete with acyclovir triphosphate and attenuate its antiviral activity. In contrast, abundant dGTP did not influence the inhibitory action of amenamevir on viral helicase-primase activity. ATP was significantly decreased at 12 h after infection and significantly more abundant in untreated infected cells compared to cells treated with acyclovir and amenamevir. The anti-herpetic activity of amenamevir was not affected by the replication cycle of VZV and HSV, indicating the suitability of amenamevir for the treatment of herpes zoster and suppressive therapy for genital herpes.

Inhibitory effect of amenamevir on acute herpetic pain and postherpetic neuralgia in mice infected with herpes simplex virus-1

BACKGROUND

Amenamevir (AMNV) is a helicase-primase inhibitor with antiviral activity against herpesviruses [herpes simplex viruses (HSV)-1 and -2, and varicella-zoster virus], which are associated with the development of acute herpetic pain (AHP) and postherpetic neuralgia. However, the inhibitory effects of helicase-primase inhibitors on AHP and postherpetic neuralgia remain incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the effects of AMNV on AHP and postherpetic pain (PHP) in HSV-1-infected mice accompanied by zosteriform-like skin lesions.

METHODS

HSV-1 was percutaneously infected on the femoral region of mice. AMNV was orally administered twice a day for 5 days. Pain-related response in the hind paw was evaluated using a paintbrush. The infiltration of inflammatory cells in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord (SC) was evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin staining. The viral load in DRG and the expression of pain-related genes in SC were measured by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Pain response was begun to be observed from day 3 post-infection (pi) in HSV-1-infected mice. AMNV administered repeatedly from day 3 pi or day 4 pi, but not day 5 pi, showed an inhibitory effect on the development of AHP and the transition to PHP. Repeated AMNV administration inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration and increases in the viral load and the expression of pain-related genes (ATF-3, TNF-α, COX-2).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that AMNV potently suppresses the development of AHP and the transition to PHP as a consequence of decreased viral load in DRG and reduced expression of pain-related genes in SC.

Acyclovir, cidofovir, and amenamevir have additive antiviral effects on herpes simplex virus TYPE 1

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) affects a large portion of the global population and has been shown to cause more severe symptoms in immunocompromised patients. It is in immunocompromised populations that HSV-1 has shown to have higher rates of resistance to the most commonly used antiherpetics, such as acyclovir/valacyclovir/penciclovir/famciclovir. The development of drug resistance has forced research into new antiherpetic therapies, including combination drug therapies. One potential complication of multidrug therapies is the existence of drug-drug interactions; as more drugs are used in the therapy, those interactions tend to become more complicated. This study tested the combination of acyclovir/cidofovir/amenamevir, the last drug being a new antiherpetic that targets the helicase-primase complex to prevent replication of viral DNA, for multidrug intervention. We used the design of experiments (DOE) function in Minitab to analyze the drug-drug interactions in their ability to inhibit growth of HSV-1. The DOE software was unable to detect any significant drug-drug interactions among these three antiherpetics as dosed. This would imply that these drugs could be used in combination to suppress viral replication without synergistic or antagonistic effects. This study shows that this therapy holds potential for further study and that DOE software is a potentially useful tool for determining complex drug-drug interactions.

Antiviral efficacy of the helicase-primase inhibitor amenamevir in murine models of severe herpesvirus infection

Existing treatments have limited efficacy against severe infection associated with herpes simplex virus (HSV) and herpes zoster virus (VZV), particularly in immunocompromized patients and those with multidermatomal infection. This issue, along with issues regarding drug resistance, support the need for improved therapeutic options. To investigate the antiviral effect of amenamevir, a VZV and HSV helicase-primase inhibitor, in severe infection conditions, mouse models of severe HSV-1 infection were developed by immunosuppression or multidermatomal infection. Mice with cyclosporin-induced immunosuppression and HSV-1 infection via inoculation of a dorsolateral area of skin were orally treated with amenamevir (10-100 mg/kg/day) for different durations (2-5 days). Immunosuppressed mice maintained high skin HSV-1 titers in the absence of treatment. Amenamevir successfully reduced HSV-1 titers at all tested doses in immunosuppressed mice, but required a longer treatment period to avoid a rebound in viral titers due to immunosuppression. To compare the efficacy of amenamevir and valacyclovir, a murine model of multidermatomal HSV-1 infection was generated by scarifying the dorsolateral area of skin in a line and inoculating broadly with HSV-1. The mice were treated with amenamevir or valacyclovir starting on Day 3, 4, or 5 post-infection for 5 days. Although both drugs similarly reduced disease scores when treatment was started on Day 3, amenamevir also reduced disease severity when treatment was initiated on Day 4, whereas valacyclovir did not. Amenamevir was not affected by the host's immune status in terms of effective oral doses and was more efficacious in treating severe cutaneous infection even when treatment initiation was delayed.

Helicase-primase inhibitor amenamevir for herpesvirus infection: Towards practical application for treating herpes zoster

Valacyclovir and famciclovir enabled successful systemic therapy for treating herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection by their phosphorylation with viral thymidine kinase. Helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) inhibit the progression of the replication fork, an initial step in DNA synthesis to separate the double strand into two single strands. The HPIs amenamevir and pritelivir have a novel mechanism of action, once-daily administration with nonrenal excretory characteristics, and clinical efficacy for genital herpes. Amenamevir exhibits anti-VZV and anti-HSV activity while pritelivir only has anti-HSV activity. A clinical trial of amenamevir for herpes zoster has been completed, and amenamevir has been licensed and successfully used in 20,000 patients with herpes zoster so far in Japan. We have characterized the features of the antiviral action of amenamevir and, unlike acyclovir, the drug's antiviral activity is not influenced by the viral replication cycle. Amenamevir is opening a new era of antiherpes therapy.

Antiviral Drugs Against Alphaherpesvirus

The discovery of acyclovir and penciclovir has led to the development of a successful systemic therapy for treating herpes simplex virus infection and varicella-zoster virus infection, and the orally available prodrugs, valacyclovir and famciclovir, have improved antiviral treatment compliance. Acyclovir and penciclovir are phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase and are incorporated into the DNA chain by viral DNA polymerase, resulting in chain termination. Helicase-primase plays an initial step in DNA synthesis to separate the double strand into two single strands (replication fork) and is a new target of antiviral therapy. The helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) pritelivir and amenamevir have novel mechanisms of action, drug resistance properties, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and clinical efficacy for treating genital herpes. The clinical study of amenamevir in herpes zoster has been completed, and amenamevir has been submitted for approval for treating herpes zoster in Japan. The clinical use of HPIs will be the beginning of a new era of anti-herpes therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Amenamevir in Healthy Subjects: Analysis of Four Randomized Phase 1 Studies

Introduction

Amenamevir (ASP2151) is a nonnucleoside antiherpesvirus compound available for the treatment of varicella–zoster virus infections. In this article we summarize the findings of four phase 1 studies in healthy participants.

Methods

Four randomized phase 1 studies investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of amenamevir, including the assessment of age group effect (nonelderly vs elderly), food effect, and the relative bioavailability of two formulations. Amenamevir was administered orally at various doses as a single dose (5–2400 mg) or daily (300 or 600 mg/day) for 7 days.

Results

Following single and multiple oral doses, amenamevir demonstrated a less than dose proportional increase in the pharmacokinetic parameters area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf) and C_max. After single and multiple oral 300-mg doses of amenamevir, no apparent differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between nonelderly and elderly participants. In contrast, with the amenamevir 600-mg dose both the area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve from time zero to 24 h and C_max were slightly increased and renal clearance was decreased in elderly participants. The pharmacokinetics of amenamevir was affected by food, with AUC_inf increased by about 90%. In the bioavailability study, AUC_inf and C_max were slightly lower following tablet versus capsule administration (decreased by 14 and 12%, respectively), with relative bioavailability of 86%. The different amenamevir doses and formulations were safe and well tolerated; no deaths or serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Amenamevir had less than dose proportional pharmacokinetic characteristics. Age may have an influence on amenamevir pharmacokinetics; however, the effect was considered minimal. The pharmacokinetics of amenamevir were affected by food, with AUC_inf almost doubling when amenamevir was administered with food. The concentration versus time profile of the tablet was slightly lower than that of the capsule; the relative bioavailability of the tablet versus the capsule was 86%. Amenamevir was safe and well tolerated in the dose range investigated.

Funding

Astellas Pharma.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02852876 (15L-CL-002) and NCT02796118 (15L-CL-003).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-017-0642-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Influence of Hepatic and Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of a Treatment for Herpes Zoster, Amenamevir (ASP2151): Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel-Group Studies

INTRODUCTION

Amenamevir (ASP2151) is a nonnucleoside human herpesvirus helicase-primase inhibitor that was approved in Japan for the treatment of herpes zoster (shingles) in 2017. This article reports the results of two clinical trials that investigated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of amenamevir.

METHODS

These studies were phase 1, open-label, single-dose (oral 400 mg), parallel-group studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of amenamevir in healthy participants and participants with moderate hepatic impairment and mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment.

RESULTS

In the hepatic impairment study, the pharmacokinetic profile of amenamevir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment was generally similar to that of participants with normal hepatic function. In the renal impairment study, the area under the amenamevir concentration versus time curve from the time of dosing up to the time of the last sample with extrapolation to infinity of the terminal phase was increased by 78.1% in participants with severe renal impairment. There was a positive relationship between creatinine clearance and oral and renal clearance for amenamevir in the renal impairment study. In both studies, amenamevir was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the hepatic impairment study indicate that no dosing adjustment is required in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. In the renal impairment study, systemic amenamevir exposure was increased by renal impairment. However, it is unlikely that renal impairment will have a significant effect on the safety of amenamevir given that in previous pharmacokinetic and safety studies in healthy individuals amenamevir was safe and well tolerated after a single dose (5-2400 mg, fasted condition) and repeated doses for 7 days (300 or 600 mg, fed condition), and the amount of amenamevir exposure in the renal impairment study was covered by those studies. These findings suggest that amenamevir does not require dosage reduction in accordance with the creatinine clearance FUNDING: Astellas Pharma.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Interactions of Amenamevir (ASP2151) with Ketoconazole, Rifampicin, Midazolam, and Warfarin in Healthy Adults

Introduction

Amenamevir is a nonnucleoside antiherpes virus compound available for treating herpes zoster infections. Four studies aimed to determine any potential interactions between amenamevir and ketoconazole, rifampicin, midazolam, or warfarin in healthy male participants.

Methods

Two studies were open-label studies that evaluated the effects of multiple doses of ketoconazole (400 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of amenamevir. The other two studies were randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies that evaluated the effects of multiple doses of amenamevir on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of midazolam (7.5 mg) and warfarin (25 mg). A drug interaction was considered to occur if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the least squares geometric mean ratio (GMR) of amenamevir to the comparator was outside the prespecified interval of 0.80–1.25.

Results

Interactions were observed between amenamevir and ketoconazole, rifampicin, and midazolam, but not between amenamevir and warfarin. After a single 400-mg dose of amenamevir, the GMRs of amenamevir plus ketoconazole or rifampicin versus amenamevir alone for C_max and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf) were 1.30 (90% CI 1.17–1.45) and 2.58 (90% CI 2.32–2.87), respectively, for ketoconazole and 0.42 (90% CI 0.37–0.49) and 0.17 (90% CI 0.15–0.19), respectively, for rifampicin. Following multiple doses of amenamevir (400 mg), the GMRs of midazolam plus amenamevir versus midazolam alone for AUC_inf and C_max were 0.53 (90% CI 0.47–0.61) and 0.63 (90% CI 0.50–0.80), respectively. After a single dose of warfarin, the (S)-warfarin and (R)-warfarin mean C_max increased and mean AUC_inf decreased in the presence of amenamevir; however, the 90% CIs of the GMRs for these parameters remained within the predefined limits.

Conclusion

These findings confirm that amenamevir (as a cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate) can interact with ketoconazole or rifampicin, and (as a cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer) can interact with midazolam; however, no interaction between amenamevir and (S)-warfarin was observed, indicating that amenamevir is not an inducer of cytochrome P450 2C9.

Funding

Astellas Pharma.

Trial registration

EudraCT2007-002227-33 (study 15L-CL-008), EudraCT2007-002228-14 (study 15L-CL-009), EudraCT2007-002761-13 (study 15L-CL-010), and EudraCT2007-002779-14 (study 15L-CL-018).

Integrative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation of amenamevir (ASP2151) for treatment of recurrent genital herpes

Amenamevir is a novel drug that targets the viral helicase-primase complex. While dose-dependent efficacy had been observed in non-clinical studies, no clear dose dependence has been observed in humans. We therefore developed a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to explain this inconsistency between species and to clarify the immune-related healing of amenamevir in humans. The model consisted of a non-linear kinetic model for a virtual number of virus plaques as a built-in biomarker. Lesion score was defined as an endpoint of antiviral efficacy, and logit model analysis was applied to the ordered-categorical lesion score. The modeling results suggested the time course profiles of lesion score could be explained with the efficacy terms in the logit model, using change in number of virus plaques as an indicator of the effects of amenamevir and time elapsed as an indicator of the healing of the immune response. In humans, the PD effect was almost dose-independent, and immune-related healing may have been the driving force behind the reduction in lesion scores. Drug efficacy is occasionally masked in diseases healed by the immune response, such as genital herpes. The PK/PD model proposed in the present study must be useful for explanation the PK/PD relationship of such drugs.

Statistical analysis of Amenamevir (ASP2151) between pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacies with non-linear effect model for the treatment of genital herpes

Amenamevir is the international non-proprietary name for ASP2151 synthesized by Astellas Pharma, Inc. It is a structurally novel class of helicase-primase inhibitor and demonstrated more potency in vitro anti-viral activity with low cytotoxicity against varicella-zoster virus (VZV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) than acyclovir (ACV). Phase II randomized trial assessed the safety and efficacy of ASP2151 for episodic therapy of recurrent genital herpes was conducted. Participants self-initiated with ASP2151 (100, 200, or 400 mg daily for 3 days), ASP2151 (1,200 mg as a single dose), placebo for 3 days, or Valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily for 3 days). We present a first population pharmacokinetic (PPK) modeling analysis of Amenamevir for genital herpes patients. The final model retained the effect of Weight and Albumin on CL. Statistical analysis between pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacies was done by using the time above 200 ng/mL (T200 ). T200 derived from the final PPK model to consider the correlation with Time to lesion healing and viral shedding. This finding suggested that it could be necessary to maintain the Amenamevir concentration above the threshold level to prevent the virus replication.