Anti-PD-1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 for advanced melanoma patients with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 has been associated with improvement in response and survival over anti-PD-1 monotherapy in unselected patients with advanced melanoma. Whether patients with liver metastases also benefit from the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 over anti-PD-1, is unclear. In this study, we sought to assess whether the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 leads to better response, progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy for patients with liver metastases.

METHODS

We have conducted an international multicentre retrospective study. Patients with advanced melanoma with liver metastases treated with 1st line anti-PD1 monotherapy or with anti-CTLA-4 were included. The endpoints of this study were: objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up from commencement of anti-PD-1 monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 of 47 months (95% CI, 42-51), objective response rate was higher with combination therapy (47%) versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (35%) (p = 0.0027), while progression-free survival and overall survival were not statistically different between both treatment groups. However, on multivariable analysis with multiple imputation for missing values and adjusting for predefined variables, combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 was associated with higher objective response (OR 2.21, 1.46 - 3.36; p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 0.57 - 0.92; p = 0.009) and overall survival (HR 0.71, 0.54 - 0.94; p = 0.018) compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study will help guide treatment selection for patients who present with liver metastases, suggesting that combination therapy should be considered for this group of patients.

Epigenetic compounds targeting pharmacological target lysine specific demethylase 1 and its impact on immunotherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment of tumor recurrence and resistance

It has been proven that metastatic recurrence and therapeutic resistance are linked. Due to the variability of individuals and tumors, as well as the tumor's versatility in avoiding therapies, therapy resistance is more difficult to treat. Therapy resistance has significantly restricted the clinical feasibility and efficacy of tumor therapy, despite the discovery of novel compounds and therapy combinations with increasing efficacy. In several tumors, lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been associated to metastatic recurrence and therapeutic resistance. For researchers to better comprehend how LSD1-mediated tumor therapy resistance occurs and how to overcome it in various tumors, this study focused on the role of LSD1 in tumor recurrence and therapeutic resistance. The importance of therapeutically targeted LSD1 was also discussed. Most gene pathway signatures are related to LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity. However, some gene pathway signatures, especially in AML, negatively correlate with LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity, but targeting LSD1 makes the therapy-resistant tumor sensitive to physiological doses of conventional therapy. We propose that combining LSD1 inhibitor with traditional tumor therapy can help patients attain a complete response and prevent cancer relapse.

Efficacy of Cytotoxic Agents After Progression on Anti-PD-(L)1 Antibody for Pre-treated Metastatic Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The efficacy of treatment using the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibody for metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) has been established previously. Exploratory analyses in various types of tumours suggest that prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of subsequent cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTx). Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CTx for mGC after progression on anti-PD-(ligand) 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] antibody.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with mGC who underwent CTx. The patients received CTx after progression on anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (cohort A) or as a third-line treatment without prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibody (cohort B). We evaluated: i) clinical characteristics, ii) efficacies, iii) prognoses, and iv) adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In cohorts A and B, 16 and 68 patients fulfilled the criteria, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the overall response rate was significantly higher in cohort A compared to cohort B (31% vs. 10%, respectively; Odds Ratio:3.96, 95% Confidence Interval:1.06-14.8, p=0.040). The multivariate analysis showed a similar trend. Immune-related AEs did not worsen and were manageable, while new immune-related AEs were not observed.

CONCLUSION

CTx after progression on anti-PD-(L)1 antibody demonstrated a favourable efficacy in intensively treated patients with mGC.