Safety evaluation of revefenacin at the approved dose in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Revefenacin is the first once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for nebulization use in maintenance therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and tolerability profile of revefenacin at the approved dose (175 μg), compared with placebo and a lower dose (88 μg), for the treatment of COPD.

METHODS

Available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both published and unpublished, were identified via databases. Risk differences (RDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effect sizes.

RESULTS

One unpublished RCT and four articles containing 5 RCTs were included. Combined results showed that there were no significant differences between COPD patients receiving 175 μg revefenacin and those receiving a placebo, concerning the risk of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), any all-grade AE, or any serious AE. 175 μg revefenacin also did not significantly increase the risk of antimuscarinic-related AEs, cardiovascular AEs, or 12 commonly reported AEs. Plus, a lower dose of 88 μg was shown to share a comparable safety profile with the 175 μg revefenacin. A non-significant trend towards a decrease in risks of AEs for 175 μg revefenacin was observed. The most frequently reported AE for each group was COPD worsening/exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

Revefenacin at the approved dose is generally well-tolerated and safe with minimal AEs, which supports its use as a once-daily nebulized LAMA for the treatment of moderate to severe stable COPD. Additional studies are needed to complete the safety and tolerability profile.

Will the evolution of overactive bladder delivery systems increase patient compliance?

The negative impact of overactive bladder (OAB) on daily quality of life drives the large market of pharmacotherapy targeted at symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urinary urge incontinence. Currently, the primary pharmacologic treatment modality is aimed at modulation of the efferent muscarinic receptors (M2 and M3) predominant in detrusor smooth muscle and responsible for involuntary or unwanted bladder contractions. However, due to drug effects in the muscarinic receptors of the salivary glands and intestinal smooth muscle, as well as extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver and intestinal tract yielding parent drug metabolites, adverse side effects are common and can be quite bothersome. These issues, encountered with many of the oral antimuscarinic formulations, limit their tolerability and affect long-term patient compliance and satisfaction. Thus, the benefit of pharmacotherapy for OAB must be a balance between efficacy and tolerability, also known as therapeutic index. This article reviews the current pharmacologic delivery systems available for the treatment of OAB, patient compliance, and reasons for discontinuation of medication.