Effects of virtual reality in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether virtual reality (VR) interventions have beneficial effects on the functional communication and language function of patients with post-stroke aphasia (PSA).

METHODS

We searched nine electronic literature databases and two clinical registry platforms to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs performed up to September 2020. Screening, quality assessment, and data collection were performed by two authors independently, using standard protocols. Data aggregation and risk of bias evaluation were conducted using Review Manager Version 5.4. The quality of evidence was evaluated with GRADEpro.

RESULTS

A total of five studies involving 121 participants met the inclusion criteria and were appraised. Four studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. VR reduced the severity of language impairment with borderline significance [SMD (95%CI) = 0.70[0.01, 1.39], P=0.05]. The meta-analysis showed no statistical difference in functional communication [SMD (95%CI) =0.41[-0.29, 1.12], P=0.25], word finding [SMD (95%CI) =0.42[-0.24, 1.08], P=0.21], and repetition [SMD (95%CI) =0.16[-0.62, 0.94], P=0.68] between VR group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrated a borderline positive clinical effect of VR for the severity of language impairment when compared with conventional rehabilitation therapy. Conversely, VR had no effect on functional communication, word finding, and repetition. Further research is warranted to reach more definite conclusions.

Modified Berg Balance Scale: making assessment appropriate for people with aphasia

OBJECTIVE

Modifying assessments for people with aphasia has the potential to increase the validity of healthcare assessments across professional domains. This pilot study addressed the challenges of giving people with aphasia the power to fully participate in the assessment process. The study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using an aphasia-modified version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a physical therapy assessment tool to quantify dynamic sitting and standing balance.

METHOD

The study compared how people with aphasia performed on the original BBS to an aphasia-modified version (MBBS), created for this study. We examined the relationship between auditory comprehension scores and balance performance of 15 participants with chronic aphasia and three control participants. We tested the hypothesis that individuals with aphasia would perform higher on the MBBS rather than the BBS, thus more closely approaching a score reflective of their true physical abilities.

RESULTS

Overall people with aphasia performed significantly better on the MBBS than the BBS, indicating that at least some portion of their performance difficulty was likely due to poor auditory comprehension of test instructions rather than true balance difficulty.

CONCLUSION

Implications of this study suggest that modifying assessments, such as the BBS, by reducing linguistic complexity and adding visual and written cues along with modeling and repetition has the potential to increase the validity of healthcare assessments for individuals with aphasia.

Visual analog rating of mood by people with aphasia

BACKGROUND

Considerable attention has been given to the identification of depression in stroke survivors with aphasia, but there is more limited information about other mood states. Visual analog scales are often used to collect subjective information from people with aphasia. However, the validity of these methods for communicating about mood has not been established in people with moderately to severely impaired language.

OBJECTIVE

The dual purposes of this study were to characterize the relative endorsement of negative and positive mood states in people with chronic aphasia after stroke and to examine congruent validity for visual analog rating methods for people with a range of aphasia severity.

METHODS

Twenty-three left-hemisphere stroke survivors with aphasia were asked to indicate their present mood by using two published visual analog rating methods. The congruence between the methods was estimated through correlation analysis, and scores for different moods were compared.

RESULTS

Endorsement was significantly stronger for "happy" than for mood states with negative valence. At the same time, several participants displayed pronounced negative mood compared to previously published norms for neurologically healthy adults. Results from the two rating methods were moderately and positively correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive mood is prominent in people with aphasia who are in the chronic stage of recovery after stroke, but negative moods can also be salient and individual presentations are diverse. Visual analog rating methods are valid methods for discussing mood with people with aphasia; however, design optimization should be explored.