Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: Head to head comparison between the Neuroform Atlas and EZ stents

BACKGROUND

The Neuroform Atlas stent is thought to have features allowing for an improved stent delivery system. We aimed to provide a comparison of the Atlas and Neuroform EZ stents in patients treated with stent-assisted coiling.

METHODS

Seventy-seven aneurysms treated with the Atlas stent and 77 aneurysms with similar characteristics treated with the EZ stent were retrospectively compared. Outcomes included angiographic occlusion per the Raymond-Roy (RR) scale, recanalization, retreatment and procedural complications.

RESULTS

With the Atlas stent, technical success was 100% and immediate RR1 occlusion was 81.8%. Follow-up RR1 was achieved in 83.7%. The recanalization rate was 7% and the retreatment rate was 4.6%. The complication rate was 6.5% (new neurological deficit in 1.3%). With the EZ stent, technical success was 96%, immediate RR1 occlusion was 67.6% and follow-up RR1 was 67.6%. The recanalization rate was 12.7% and the retreatment rate was 14.1%. The complication rate was 10.4% (new neurological deficit in 2.6%). The rate of immediate RR1 occlusion was significantly higher with the Atlas stent (p = 0.03), and the rate of follow-up RR1 was nonsignificantly higher with the Atlas stent (p = 0.08). The retreatment rate was significantly lower with the Atlas stent (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the rates of recanalization (p = 0.5) and complications (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-assisted coiling with the Atlas stent is safe and effective and shows better immediate results as compared to the EZ stent, with improved overall follow-up outcomes.

Early Multicenter Experience With the Neuroform Atlas Stent: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy

BACKGROUND

The Neuroform Atlas stent™ (by Stryker, Fremont, California) represents the most recent widely available upgrade to intracranial stenting, providing a laser cut open cell stent with a diameter of 3.0 to 4.5 mm that is delivered through an 0.017-inch microcatheter.

OBJECTIVE

To report our initial multicenter experience of the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the Atlas stent used for treating aneurysms, as well as one case of intracranial stenosis and one carotid artery dissection as well as other pathologies.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study of subjects treated with Atlas stent during the period 2018 to 2019.

RESULTS

The total number of patients included in our analysis was 71 patients. The stent was utilized to treat 69 aneurysm cases. Of the aneurysms, 36% presented with acute rupture and 56% of the ruptured aneurysms were high grade. Mean aneurysm dimension was 7 mm with an average neck width of 4.1 mm. Around 30% had received prior treatment. Telescoping or Y-stent was used in 16% of cases. We did not observe any symptomatic major complications in our series. Asymptomatic major complications were seen in 7 patients (10.1%); technical complications occurred in 4.3%. Immediate modified Raymond-Roy-occlusion-outcome class I/II was observed in 87%, and this increased to 97.7% at latest follow-up, which was at 4 mo; 91.8% of patients achieved favorable clinical outcome, and mortality rate was 1.4%.

CONCLUSION

Our series demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the Atlas stent. The low complication rate and the high obliteration rate managing complex aneurysms, even in an acute ruptured setting, are notable.