1
|
Őri D, Szocsics P, Molnár T, Motlova LB, Kazakova O, Mörkl S, Wallies M, Abdulhakim M, Boivin S, Bruna K, Cabaços C, Carbone EA, Dashi E, Grech G, Greguras S, Ivanovic I, Guevara K, Kakar S, Kotsis K, Ingeholm Klinkby IM, Maslak J, Matheiken S, Mirkovic A, Nechepurenko N, Panayi A, Pereira AT, Pomarol-Clotet E, Raaj S, Prelog PR, Soler-Vidal J, Strumila R, Schuster F, Kisand H, Reim A, Ahmadova G, Vircik M, Kafali HY, Grinko N, Győrffy Z, Rózsa S. Attitudes of psychiatrists towards people with mental illness: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of stigma in 32 European countries. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 66:102342. [PMID: 38149261 PMCID: PMC10749877 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mental health-related stigma occurs among the public and professionals alike. The lived experience of mental illness has been linked to less stigmatising attitudes. However, data on psychiatrists and the relationship between stigmatising attitudes and psychotherapeutic activity or case discussion groups remains scarce. Methods A cross-sectional multicentre study was performed in 32 European countries to investigate the lived experiences and attitudes of psychiatrists toward patients with mental illness as well as the relationship between stigma, psychosocial and professional factors. The self-reported, anonymous, internet-based Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers was used to measure the stigmatising attitudes. The survey was translated into the local language of each participating country. All participants were practising specialists and trainees in general adult or child and adolescent psychiatry. The study took place between 2nd October, 2019 and 9th July, 2021 and was preregistered at ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04644978). Findings A total of 4245 psychiatrists completed the survey. The majority, 2797 (66%), had completed training in psychiatry, and 3320 (78%) worked in adult psychiatry. The final regression model showed that across European countries more favourable attitudes toward people with mental illness were statistically significantly associated with the lived experience of participants (including seeking help for their own mental health conditions (d = -0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.68 to -0.15, p = 0.019), receiving medical treatment for a mental illness (d = -0.88, 95% CI = -1.71 to -0.04, p = 0.040), as well as having a friend or a family member similarly affected (d = -0.68, 95% CI = -1.14 to -0.22, p = 0.004)), being surrounded by colleagues who are less stigmatising (d = -0.98, 95% CI = -1.26 to -0.70, p < 0.001), providing psychotherapy to patients (d = -1.14, 95% CI = -1.63 to -0.65 p < 0.001), and being open to (d = -1.69, 95% CI = -2.53 to -0.85, p < 0.001) and actively participating in (d = -0.94, 95% CI = -1.45 to -0.42, p < 0.001) case discussion, supervision, or Balint groups. Interpretation Our study highlights the importance of psychotherapy training, supervision, case discussions and Balint groups in reducing the stigmatising attitudes of psychiatrists toward patients. As the findings represent cross-national predictors, Europe-wide policy interventions, national psychiatric education systems and the management of psychiatric institutions should take these findings into consideration. Funding National Youth Talent Award (Ministry of Human Resources, Hungary, (NTP-NFTÖ-20-B-0134). All authors received no funding for their contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorottya Őri
- Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Mental Health, Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Szocsics
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Molnár
- Department of Psychiatry, Aladar Petz County Teaching Hospital, Győr, Hungary
| | - Lucie Bankovska Motlova
- Division of Medical Psychology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic
| | - Olga Kazakova
- Inpatient Psychiatric Department #2, Psychiatric Clinic of Minsk City, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Sabrina Mörkl
- Division of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Sylvie Boivin
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, EPSM du Finistère Sud, Quimper, France
| | - Krista Bruna
- Admission Ward, State Psychiatric Hospital Gintermuiza, Jelgava, Latvia
| | - Carolina Cabaços
- Psychiatry Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Institute of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
- Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Elvira Anna Carbone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Elona Dashi
- Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital Center “Mother Theresa”, Tirane, Albania
| | - Giovanni Grech
- Mental Health Services, Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
| | - Stjepan Greguras
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Iva Ivanovic
- Department for Child Psychiatry, Institute for Children's Diseases, Clinical Centre of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
| | - Kaloyan Guevara
- Acute Detoxification Ward, State Psychiatric Hospital for Treatment of Drug Addiction and Alcoholism, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Selay Kakar
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Ana Mirkovic
- Child Psychiatry Unit, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nikita Nechepurenko
- The Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Ana Telma Pereira
- Institute of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal
- Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Edith Pomarol-Clotet
- FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shaeraine Raaj
- Department of General Adult Psychiatry, South Meath Mental Health Service, Co.Meath, Ireland
| | - Polona Rus Prelog
- Centre for Clinical Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joan Soler-Vidal
- FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries Research Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital Benito Menni, Complex Assistencial Salut Mental, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Robertas Strumila
- Department of Urgent and Post Urgent Psychiatry, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
- Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Florian Schuster
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München: Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ann Reim
- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Gumru Ahmadova
- Department of Psychiatry, United City Hospital N15, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Matus Vircik
- Acute Psychiatric Department 1, Psychiatric Hospital Michalovce, Michalovce, Slovak Republic
| | - Helin Yilmaz Kafali
- Department of Psychology, Fevziye School Fundatitions, Işık University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Natalia Grinko
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Ukrainian Catholic University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Zsuzsa Győrffy
- Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sándor Rózsa
- Department of Personality and Health Psychology, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Natsukari I, Higuchi M, Tsujimoto T. How do patients and families evaluate attitude of psychiatrists in Japan?: quantitative content analysis of open-ended items of patient responses from a large-scale questionnaire survey. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:253. [PMID: 37059984 PMCID: PMC10105434 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04732-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) has been widely advocated in psychiatric fields. In Japan, however, PPI has not been implemented in clinical practice. In order to improve quality of psychiatric service in Japan, it is essential to understand psychiatrists' attitudes from the patients' perspective as a first step in practicing PPI. This study aimed to investigate the patients' evaluation of psychiatrists' attitudes by illustrating themes appeared in the questionnaire survey. METHODS This study used the data obtained from the questionnaire survey responded by 2,683 patients with family members who belong to the family associations for psychiatric patients in Japan. Three open-ended question items in this survey, "criteria for selecting a psychiatrist (784 patient responses, response rate 29.2%)," "attitude of the psychiatrist in charge (929 patient responses, response rate 34.6%)," and "communication skills of the psychiatrist in charge (739 patient responses, response rate 27.5%)" were analyzed by co-occurrence network using KH Coder software. RESULTS The common theme observed in all three items was whether psychiatrist took sufficient consultation time. The criteria for selecting a psychiatrist were summarized whether psychiatrist provided appropriate advices for patients' problems, whether psychiatrist cared about patients' demands and whether psychiatrist informed to patients about diseases and medications. The attitudes of the psychiatrists in charge that patients had most wanted their psychiatrists to improve were: psychiatrists only watch the computer, make diagnosis according to the patients' individual condition, and try to build a relationship of trust with the patient. The patients' demands regarding communication skills of the psychiatrist in charge included: whether the psychiatrist communicated in a way that improves the patient's psychological state, whether the psychiatrist was attentive to the patients' family, and whether the psychiatrist could control his/her own mood during the consultation. CONCLUSION The results reflected the patients' demands that do not appear in closed-ended items. It was suggested that patients'open-ended responses to questionnaires and their involvement in the psychiatric research (PPI) may provide more insight into improving pshchiaric care in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikuko Natsukari
- Yakitsubeno-Michi Clinic, 162 Nakazato, Yaizu City, Shizuoka, 425-0014, Japan.
| | - Mari Higuchi
- Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita 10, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo City, 060-0810, Japan
| | - Tai Tsujimoto
- Nanzan University Institute for Social Ethics, 18 Yamazato-cho, Syowa-Ku, Nagoya City, Aichi, 466-8673, Japan
| |
Collapse
|