Unraveling the BMI paradox in different renal cortical tumors: insights from the INMARC registry

OBJECTIVE

To investigate impact of body mass index (BMI) on survival across different histologies and stages of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of clear cell (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC. Obesity was defined according to the WHO criteria (non-Asian BMI >30 Kg/m2, Asian BMI >27.5 Kg/m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression model was conducted for all-cause (ACM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 3,880 patients with a median follow-up of 31 (IQR 9-64) months were analyzed. Overall, 1,373 (35.3%) were obese; 2,895 (74.6%) were ccRCC and 985 (25.3%) were non-ccRCC (chRCC 246 [24.9%], pRCC 469 [47.6%] and vhRCC 270 [27.4%]). MVA in ccRCC revealed obesity associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM and recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, P = 0.044; HR 0.71, P = 0.039; HR 0.73, P = 0.012, respectively), while in non-ccRCC was not associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (P = 0.84, P = 0.53, P = 0.84, respectively). Subset analysis in stage IV ccRCC demonstrated obesity as associated with a decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (HR 0.68, P = 0.04; HR 0.59, P = 0.01; HR 0.59, P = 0.01, respectively), while in stage I-III ccRCC was not (P = 0.21; P = 0.30; P = 0.19, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings refute a broad "obesity paradox" for RCC. Obesity was not associated with improved survival in non-ccRCC and in nonmetastatic ccRCC, while metastatic ccRCC patients with obesity had improved survival outcomes.

A comparison of analytic approaches for investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer

PURPOSE

Body mass index (BMI) and kidney cancer mortality are inconsistently associated in the scientific literature. To understand how study design affects results, we contrasted associations between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality under different analytic scenarios in a large, population-based prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Using data from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (1995-2011), we constructed two cohorts: a "full at-risk" cohort with no kidney cancer history at baseline (n = 252,845) and an "incident cancer" subset who developed kidney cancer during follow-up (n = 1,652). Cox Proportional Hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between pre-diagnosis BMI and mortality for different outcomes (all-cause and cancer-specific mortality), in the different cohorts (full at-risk vs. incident cancer cohort), and with different covariates (minimally vs. fully adjusted). For the incident cancer cohort, we also examined time to mortality using different timescales: from enrollment or diagnosis.

RESULTS

In the full at-risk study population, higher pre-diagnosis BMI was associated with greater cancer-specific mortality in fully adjusted multivariable models, particularly for obese participants [HR, (95% CI): 1.76, (1.38-2.25)]. This association was less pronounced in the incident cancer cohort [1.50, (1.09-2.07)]. BMI was not strongly associated with all-cause mortality in either cohort in fully adjusted models [full cohort: 1.03, (1.01, 1.06); incident cancer cohort: 1.20, (0.97, 1.48)].

CONCLUSIONS

Populations characterized by high adult BMI will likely experience greater population burdens of mortality from kidney cancer, partially because of higher rates of kidney cancer diagnosis. Questions regarding overall mortality burden and post-diagnosis cancer survivorship are distinct and require different study designs.