Proteogenomic analysis identifies neoantigens and bacterial peptides as immunotherapy targets in colorectal cancer

Considerable progress has recently been made in cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade, cancer vaccine, and adoptive T cell methods. The lack of effective targets is a major cause of the low immunotherapy response rate in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we used a proteogenomic strategy comprising immunopeptidomics, whole exome sequencing, and 16 S ribosomal DNA sequencing analyses of 8 patients with CRC to identify neoantigens and bacterial peptides that can serve as antitumor targets. This study directly identified several personalized neoantigens and bacterial immunopeptides. Immunoassays showed that all neoantigens and 5 of 8 bacterial immunopeptides could be recognized by autologous T cells. Additionally, T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequencing revealed the TCR repertoire of epitope-reactive CD8+ T cells. Functional studies showed that T cell receptor-T (TCR-T) could be activated by epitope pulsed lymphoblastoid cells. Overall, this study comprehensively profiled the CRC immunopeptidome, revealing several neoantigens and bacterial peptides with potential to serve as immunotherapy targets in CRC.

Colorectal cancer treatment using bacteria: focus on molecular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer which is related to genetic and environmental risk factors, is among the most prevalent life-threatening cancers. Although several pathogenic bacteria are associated with colorectal cancer etiology, some others are considered as highly selective therapeutic agents in colorectal cancer. Nowadays, researchers are concentrating on bacteriotherapy as a novel effective therapeutic method with fewer or no side effects to pay the way of cancer therapy. The introduction of advanced and successful strategies in bacterial colorectal cancer therapy could be useful to identify new promising treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients.

MAIN TEXT

In this article, we scrutinized the beneficial effects of bacterial therapy in colorectal cancer amelioration focusing on different strategies to use a complete bacterial cell or bacterial-related biotherapeutics including toxins, bacteriocins, and other bacterial peptides and proteins. In addition, the utilization of bacteria as carriers for gene delivery or other known active ingredients in colorectal cancer therapy are reviewed and ultimately, the molecular mechanisms targeted by the bacterial treatment in the colorectal cancer tumors are detailed.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the bacterial instrument in cancer treatment is on its way through becoming a promising method of colorectal cancer targeted therapy with numerous successful studies and may someday be a practical strategy for cancer treatment, particularly colorectal cancer.

Clinical relevance of intestinal peptide uptake

AIM: To determine available information on an independent peptide transporter 1 (PepT1) and its potential relevance to treatment, this evaluation was completed.

METHODS: Fully published English language literature articles sourced through PubMed related to protein digestion and absorption, specifically human peptide and amino acid transport, were accessed and reviewed. Papers from 1970 to the present, with particular emphasis on the past decade, were examined. In addition, abstracted information translated to English in PubMed was also included. Finally, studies and reviews relevant to nutrient or drug uptake, particularly in human intestine were included for evaluation. This work represents a summary of all of these studies with particular reference to peptide transporter mediated assimilation of nutrients and pharmacologically active medications.

RESULTS: Assimilation of dietary protein in humans involves gastric and pancreatic enzyme hydrolysis to luminal oligopeptides and free amino acids. During the ensuing intestinal phase, these hydrolytic products are transported into the epithelial cell and, eventually, the portal vein. A critical component of this process is the uptake of intact di-peptides and tri-peptides by an independent PepT1. A number of “peptide-mimetic” pharmaceutical agents may also be transported through this carrier, important for uptake of different antibiotics, antiviral agents and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In addition, specific peptide products of intestinal bacteria may also be transported by PepT1, with initiation and persistence of an immune response including increased cytokine production and associated intestinal inflammatory changes. Interestingly, these inflammatory changes may also be attenuated with orally-administered anti-inflammatory tripeptides administered as site-specific nanoparticles and taken up by this PepT1 transport protein.

CONCLUSION: Further evaluation of the role of this transporter in treatment of intestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease is needed.