Performance of standard systematic biopsy versus MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy using the Navigo® system in contemporary cohort

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of multi parameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate in combination with MRI/TRUS fusion and systematic biopsy resulted in improved detection of prostate cancer. The aim of the current study was to document the performance of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate using the Navigo™ software in a contemporary cohort of patients from nonreferral centers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a two centers prospective data collection (2014-2020) for men with clinically suspected Pca and patients on active surveillance for low-risk Pca that were referred for TRUS biopsy after performing mpMRI of the prostate with a visible lesion. The primary outcome was detection of clinically significant cancer (csPca) defined as ISUP grade group ≥2. Patients were stratified according to biopsy technique and PI-RADS category.

RESULTS

The study group included 236 patients of whom 129 (54.9%) were diagnosed with Pca and 82 (34.7%) with csPca (GG ≥ 2) on combined biopsy. The overall detection of csPca was 31% for targeted vs. 25.4% for systematic biopsy with an absolute difference of 5.6% in favor of the fusion technique. No significant difference between the two techniques was observed for detection of benign prostate or GG1 disease. The improved performance of the targeted approach was noted only in patients with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. Of the patients with csPca 10 (12%) were diagnosed only by the systematic biopsy while 20 (24%) were detected only in the fusion biopsy. Systematic biopsy of prostate lobe without MRI lesion detected only 2 cases (∼1%) with high grade disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of csPca by mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy using the 3D Navigo™ system is feasible. The targeted approach outperforms the systematic one, however the later technique also detects high risk disease and should be included in the biopsy procedure. The overall detection rate (34.9%) of clinically significant prostate cancer by both targeted and systematic sampling is relatively low.

New transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy for men in whom PSA is increasing after Miles' operation

OBJECTIVES

Currently, a prostate biopsy is guided by transrectal ultrasound (US) alone. However, this biopsy cannot be performed in men without an anus. The aim of this study was to show the outcomes of a new transperineal US (TPUS)-guided biopsy technique in patients who underwent Miles' operation.

METHODS

Between April 2009 and March 2022, TPUS-guided biopsy was consecutively conducted in 9 patients (median, 71 years; range, 61-78 years) with high prostate-specific antigen values (22.60 ng/mL; 6.19-69.7 ng/mL). Their anuses were all removed due to rectal cancer. TPUS-guided biopsy was performed according to information on prostate magnetic resonance imaging. The technical success rate, cancer detection rate, and complication rate were recorded. Tumor sizes were compared between benign and cancer groups using an unpaired t-test with Welch's correction.

RESULTS

The new TPUS-guided biopsy was successfully performed in all patients. Cancer was detected in 77.8% (7/9) of the patients. These were all categorized as PI-RADS 5. Among them, the detection rate of significant cancer (Gleason score 7 or higher) was 66.7% (6/9). The median tumor size was 2.4 cm (1.7-3.1 cm). However, two patients were diagnosed with benign tissue with PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 4. Their median tumor size was 1.0 cm (0.8-1.2 cm). There was significant difference between the cancer and benign groups (p = 0.037) in terms of tumor size. Neither post-biopsy bleeding nor infections occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

New TPUS-guided biopsy technique may contribute to detecting large PI-RADS 5 prostate cancer in men after Miles' operation.

Skin Biopsy Techniques

Because many skin lesions and disorders can appear similar, primary care clinicians often struggle to diagnose them definitively without histopathologic information obtained from a biopsy. This review article explains how to decide whether a lesion should be biopsied and what type of biopsy technique to use and then outlines the stepwise approach to each of the most common skin biopsy techniques: shave, saucerization, punch, fusiform, and subcutaneous nodule biopsies. Finally, potential pitfalls and complications are discussed so the clinician can avoid those and can provide a cosmetically acceptable result from these common outpatient procedures.

A comprehensive review of biopsy techniques for oculoplastic and orbital surgeons from ophthalmic pathologists' perspective

This narrative review aims to discuss different modalities for obtaining diagnostic orbital biopsies, compares the available updated methods, and provides recommendations on the choice of technique. It also highlights special precautions in the handling of orbital specimens from various pathologies. A search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar with no language or study type restriction. The keywords orbital biopsy, core biopsy, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and orbit were used, and titles and abstracts were screened for relevance.

Bronchoscopic sampling techniques in the era of technological bronchoscopy

Flexible bronchoscopy is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool. New endoscopes and technologically advanced navigational modalities have been recently introduced on the market and in clinical practice, mainly for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph adenopathies and peripheral lung nodules. Bronchoscopic sampling tools have not changed significantly in the last three decades, with the sole exception of cryobiopsy. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at summarizing the scientific evidence on the main indications/contraindications, diagnostic yield, and safety of the available bronchoscopic sampling techniques. Performance of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial washing, brushing, forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy and needle aspiration techniques are described, focusing on indications and diagnostic accuracy in the work-up of endobronchial lesions, peripheral pulmonary abnormalities, interstitial lung diseases, and/or hilar-mediastinal lymph adenopathies. Main factors affecting the diagnostic yield and the navigational methods are evaluated. Preliminary data on the utility of the newest sampling techniques (i.e., new needles, triple cytology needle brush, core biopsy system, and cautery-assisted transbronchial forceps biopsy) are shown. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: A deep knowledge of bronchoscopic sampling techniques is crucial in the era of technological bronchoscopy for an optimal management of respiratory diseases.