An international multicentre evaluation of treatment strategies for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma✰

Background & Aims

Management of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is not well-defined. Therefore, we evaluated the management of cHCC-CCA using an online hospital-wide multicentre survey sent to expert centres.

Methods

A survey was sent to members of the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) and the International Cholangiocarcinoma Research Network (ICRN), in July 2021. To capture the respondents' contemporary decision-making process, a hypothetical case study with different tumour size and number combinations was embedded.

Results

Of 155 surveys obtained, 87 (56%) were completed in full and included for analysis. Respondents represented Europe (68%), North America (20%), Asia (11%), and South America (1%) and included surgeons (46%), oncologists (29%), and hepatologists/gastroenterologists (25%). Two-thirds of the respondents included at least one new patient with cHCC-CCA per year. Liver resection was reported as the most likely treatment for a single cHCC-CCA lesion of 2.0-6.0 cm (range: 73-93%) and for two lesions, one up to 6 cm and a second well-defined lesion of 2.0 cm (range: 60-66%). Nonetheless, marked interdisciplinary differences were noted. Surgeons mainly adhered to resection if technically feasible, whereas up to half of the hepatologists/gastroenterologists and oncologists switched to alternative treatment options with increasing tumour burden. Fifty-one (59%) clinicians considered liver transplantation as an option for patients with cHCC-CCA, with the Milan criteria defining the upper limit of inclusion. Overall, well-defined cHCC-CCA treatment policies were lacking and management was most often dependent on local expertise.

Conclusions

Liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Marked interdisciplinary differences were reported, depending on local expertise. These findings stress the need for a well-defined multicentre prospective trial comparing treatments, including liver transplantation, to optimise the therapeutic management of cHCC-CCA.

Impact and implications

Because the treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), a rare form of liver cancer, is currently not well-defined, we evaluated the contemporary treatment of this rare tumour type through an online survey sent to expert centres around the world. Based on the responses from 87 clinicians (46% surgeons, 29% oncologists, 25% hepatologists/gastroenterologists), representing four continents and 25 different countries, we found that liver resection is considered the first-line treatment of cHCC-CCA, with many clinicians supporting liver transplantation within limits. Nonetheless, marked differences in treatment decisions were reported among the different specialties (surgeon vs. oncologist vs. hepatologist/gastroenterologist), highlighting the urgent need for a standardisation of therapeutic strategies for patients with cHCC-CCA.

Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma with Intracranial Extension - A Case Report with Review of Literature

Rationale

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma is a rare malignant tumour exclusively involving the sinonasal cavity. These tumours have variable and atypical presentations. Early approach and correct treatment modalities are key factors in the management of such cases.

Patient Concern

A 48-year-old male patient presented with left-sided nasal obstruction and intermittent nasal bleeding for one year.

Diagnosis

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma confirmed on histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry.

Treatment

The patient underwent surgical excision with left lateral rhinotomy and bifrontal craniotomy with skull base repair. The patient also received postoperative radiotherapy.

Outcome

The patient is on regular follow-up with no similar complaints.

Take-Away Lesson

Treating team should keep the diagnosis of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma in mind while investigating a patient with nasal mass. Surgical management is the treatment of choice, due to its local aggressive nature and proximity to the brain and eyes. Postoperative radiotherapy is vital to prevent tumour recurrence.

Hybrid chemotherapy regimen (FLAG-IDA-vincristine-prednisone) for acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts

BACKGROUND

Acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts is associated with poor outcomes. There are no standard treatment regimens. Due to disease heterogeneity, controversy exists over whether an AML-based, ALL-based, or a combined (hybrid) AML/ALL-based regimen is most appropriate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective case series review of patients with acute leukemia with mixed phenotype blasts as described by the European Group for Immunological Characterization of Leukemia (EGIL) or the 2008 WHO classification. Patients were treated from November 2014 and December 2019 with the combination chemotherapy regimen FLAG-idarubicin-vincristine-prednisone with or without rituximab. Outcomes included induction response, time to transplant, time to relapse, overall survival, time to neutrophil or platelet recovery, infection, and duration of hospitalization.

RESULTS

The median age was 68 years (range 21-77). Six patients (87.5 %) had unfavorable/complex cytogenetics. All patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Estimated 1-year overall survival was 85.7 %. There were no deaths during induction, with a 22 day median duration of hospitalization for induction.

CONCLUSION

The combination of FLAG, idarubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (FLAG-VIPR) demonstrated favorable induction responses in a disease state with historically poor outcomes and should be studied in a prospective clinical trial.

Collision and composite tumors; radiologic and pathologic correlation

The terms composite and collision tumors have been used interchangeably throughout radiological literature. Both composite and collision tumors involve two morphologically and immunohistochemically distinct neoplasms coexisting within a single organ. However, collision tumors lack the histological cellular intermingling seen in composite tumors. Composite tumors often arise from a common driver mutation that induces a divergent histology from a common neoplastic source while collision tumors may arise from coincidental neoplastic change. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of abdominal composite and collision tumors by discussing hallmark radiographic and pathological presentations of rare hepatic, renal, and adrenal case studies. A better understanding of the presentation of each lesion is imperative for proper recognition, diagnosis, and management of these unique tumor presentations.

Anatomic pathology of hepatocellular carcinoma: histopathology using classic and new diagnostic tools

Hepatocellular carcinoma can be diagnosed on a needle biopsy of the liver; however, uncertainty may arise because of the inherent complexity of liver histology. This article aims to provide practicing pathologists with tools for the approach to mass-directed liver biopsies clinically concerning for hepatocellular carcinoma. The examination of routine hematoxylin-eosin stains and the use of ancillary histochemical and immunohistochemical stains are discussed. Sections reviewing liver carcinoma with biphenotypic differentiation and the challenge of dysplastic nodules are included.

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia: A study of 61 cases using World Health Organization and European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukaemias criteria

OBJECTIVES

The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system grouped bilineal and biphenotypic acute leukemias together under a new heading of mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). The lineage-specific marker criteria have also changed for a diagnosis of MPAL. The goal of this study was to characterize clinical significance of this new group.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients diagnosed with MPAL using either European Group for the Immunological Classification of Leukaemias (EGIL) criteria or 2008 WHO criteria were included in this study.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (26%) diagnosed with acute biphenotypic leukemia using EGIL criteria did not fulfill 2008 WHO criteria for MPAL. Cytogenetic data were available for 32 patients, and the most common abnormality was t(9;22) (five of 32 cases). Clinical outcome data suggested that younger patients with MPAL (≤21 years) had better overall survival (OS) in both the EGIL and WHO groups (EGIL, P = .0403; WHO, P = .0601). Compared with 177 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MPAL patients had better OS (P = .0003) and progression-free survival (P = .0001). However, no difference in OS between MPAL and 387 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia was present (P = .599).

CONCLUSIONS

As defined by the 2008 WHO classification, fewer patients are now classified as having MPAL than with the EGIL criteria. In this study, patients with MPAL have a better clinical outcome compared with patients with AML.