Differential preferences in breast aesthetics by self-identified demographics assessed on a national survey

There is a paucity of literature examining how preferences differ amongst various demographic groups. This study aimed to assess how perceptions of the ideal breast differ between respondents stratified by self-identified demographic factors. A cohort of 25 patients from the senior surgeon's practice presenting for breast surgery was assembled. Pre-operative anteroposterior photographs of these patients were distributed via Qualtrics (Seattle, WA) to a large sample designed to be representative of the demographics of the United States. Survey questions aimed to measure respondents' impressions of 'breast attractiveness'. Respondents were asked to rate breasts on a Likert scale. Survey responses were analysed for differences in breast aesthetic preferences by sex, gender, sexual orientation, and race. Males rated all breasts higher on the Likert scale for attractiveness than females (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). Despite this discrepancy, ratings amongst male and female respondents were highly correlated with one another (R = 0.940; p < 0.0001). Considering sexual orientation, individuals attracted to women provided significantly higher attractiveness ratings to all breasts compared to individuals attracted to men only (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). White or Caucasian individuals ascribed significantly higher breast attractiveness ratings than Asian individuals (2.7 vs 2.2, p < 0.001), but not Black or African American individuals (2.7 vs 2.4, p = 0.23). Despite these racial discrepancies in mean breast attractiveness, ratings amongst the three groups were highly correlated. In a sample representative of the United States, a difference in breast aesthetic appraisal was observed by demographic factors. These findings merit further investigation to understand these trends and observations.

Imaging classification and BIRADS assessment of cystic breast lesions with pathologic correlates. a 5-year experience in Zaria, North West Nigeria

Background

Breast cysts encompass a variety of pathologies, both benign and malignant. Therefore, classifying cysts into different categories is needful to develop a management algorithm. This study aimed to describe and distinguish between simple, complicated and complex cysts; and compare the final BIRADS assessment with pathologic findings.

Materials and methods

A 5-year retrospective review of our ultrasound database identified two hundred and seventy patients with cystic breast lesions. They were divided into simple, complicated and complex cysts according to ultrasound characteristics based on shape, orientation, margin, wall thickness, internal features (echogenicity, septa, mass) posterior acoustic features, surrounding tissue vascularity. The final BIRADS assessment was correlated with histological findings.

Results

There were two hundred and sixty-six (98.5%) females and four (1.5%) males with a mean age 34.9 ± 11.8 years. The commonest presentation was a palpable mass, in 70% of the patients. There were 89 (33.0%) simple cysts, 61 (22.6%) complicated cysts and 120 (44.4%) complex cysts.

Conclusion

Majority of the breast cysts (83%) were benign with overall 17% incidence of malignancy. Complex cysts were the most frequent cyst type in our study, it is also the category most frequently associated with breast cancer, obviating the need for histology.

Measuring positive breast experience: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Breast Appreciation Scale (BrAS)

Existing measures of women's breasted experiences have focused on negative experiences, which de-centres women's meaning-making and relationships with their breasts. To rectify this, we developed a novel measure of women's positive breasted experiences, the Breast Appreciation Scale (BrAS), and examined the psychometric properties of this novel measure across four studies. Study 1, with 307 United Kingdom women, led to the extraction of a 9-item, unidimensional model of BrAS scores that showed adequate composite reliability and 4-week test-retest reliability. Study 2, with 297 United Kingdom women, showed that the unidimensional model of BrAS scores had adequate fit and evidenced convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Study 3, with 295 women from the United Kingdom, provided additional support for factorial validity and concurrent validity, and additionally provided evidence of known-groups validity insofar as mothers had greater breast appreciation than non-mothers. Study 4 showed that the BrAS was scalar invariant across women from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (N = 573) and provided additional evidence of concurrent validity. Based on these results, we conclude that the BrAS is a psychometrically valid measure of women's positive breasted experiences that can be utilised in future research.

Construction of an integrated sexual function questionnaire for women with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

With the increasing incidence of breast cancer in young women, its side effects have extended into the sexual lives of women. However, an appropriate tool to measure the sexual function is nonexistent. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable tool to measure sexual function in women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After conducting literature reviews regarding the sexual function characteristics of women with breast cancer, this study designed a set of integrated sexual function questionnaires, which included pertinent information and three scales. The validity of the scales was examined under the guidance of three gender studies experts and two gynecologists who are also professors. Regarding the construct validity, researchers conducted exploratory factor analysis on the measurement results of 196 women with breast cancer.

RESULTS

The integrated sexual function questionnaires included the following three scales: "Breasts' Role Self-Checklist," "Scales for Breasts' Role in the Foreplay," and "Female Sexual Function Scale for BCSs." The questionnaire tool consisted of the longitudinal time change, patients' and their partners' situation, information related to the recovery process, participants' perspective toward objectification of women's breasts, the role of breasts in foreplay during sexual activities, sexual desire, sexual satisfaction, sexual obstacle, and other self-evaluations. We first derived one factor from six questions in "Breasts' Role Self-Checklist" and named it as "The Importance of Breasts for Women." The other two factors were obtained from eight questions in "Scales for Breasts' Role in the Foreplay" and named as "Sexual Attraction to Breasts" and "Function of Breasts in Foreplay." In addition, three factors were derived from 16 questions in "Female Sexual Function Scale for BCSs" and named as "Sexual Desire," "Sexual Satisfaction," and "Sexual Obstacle."

CONCLUSION

This study determined that these integrated scales for breast cancer survivors are suitable due to their content validity, construct validity, and high internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of higher than 0.9 for all the three scales.

Mastopexy with Autologous Augmentation in Women After Massive Weight Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Breast reshaping or mastopexy following massive weight loss can be challenging. The LOPOSAM (lower pole subglandular advancement mastoplasty) technique has shown promising results for correction of ptotic, wide, lateralized and deflated breasts following massive weight loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the LOPOSAM technique to the mastopexy technique after massive weight loss described by Rubin JP, in a randomized trial. The main outcome measure was the total operative time. Secondary outcomes measures were socio-economic factors; length of hospital stay, numbers of sutures used, secondary corrective procedures, post-operative sick leave and surgeon- and patient-reported appearance of the breasts.

RESULTS

We included 22 women: 11 operated on by the LOPOSAM technique and 11 by the technique described by Rubin JP. The total operative time was 84.8 (SD 12.2) minutes in the LOPOSAM group and 99.1 (SD 23.5) in the Rubin JP group (p = 0.074). There were no differences related to days with drains, length of hospital stay or sick leave between the two groups. The surgeon- and the patient-reported appearance of the breasts changed significantly between the pre-operative and the 12-month post-operative assessments.

CONCLUSION

The LOPOSAM technique is a safe and quick surgical procedure for correction of ptotic, wide, lateralized and deflated breasts following massive weight loss and seems to provide results comparable to the better-known Rubin JP's technique. There was a trend that the LOPOSAM technique was faster to perform, however, not significant. The breast appearance improved significantly using both techniques when assessed by both surgeons and patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .