Serum hepatocyte growth factor as a predictor of disease severity and future exacerbations in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Serum biomarkers associated with the severity of non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis are insufficient. This study determined the association of serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), osteopontin, and pentraxin-3 levels with disease severity and exacerbation in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis.

METHODS

Serum levels of HGF, osteopontin, and pentraxin-3 were measured in patients with clinically stable non-CF bronchiectasis (n = 61). The correlation between the biomarkers and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and FACED score was assessed using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. Predictive variables associated with exacerbation were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model and the time to first exacerbation in high and low HGF groups during the observation period was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

The BSI showed significant correlation with HGF (r = 0.423; p = 0.001) and pentraxin-3 (r = 0.316; p = 0.013). The FACED score was significantly correlated with HGF (r = 0.406; p = 0.001). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that serum level of HGF was independently associated with both scoring systems. The high HGF group showed a significantly shorter time to first exacerbation (Log-rank test, p = 0.014). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that high serum HGF level and colonization with non-pseudomonas organisms were independent predictors of future exacerbations (HR 2.364; p = 0.024 and HR 2.438; p = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Serum level of HGF is a potential biomarker that is closely associated with disease severity and future risk of exacerbations in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis.

Mepolizumab effectiveness in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and co-presence of bronchiectasis: A real-world retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

The association of bronchiectasis (BE) in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is quite frequent. Mepolizumab is a well-recognized treatment for SEA; we aim to evaluate its effectiveness in SEA patients with and without BE in real-life.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective pilot study, including patients with SEA treated with mepolizumab for one year. Asthma control test (ACT), lung function, annual exacerbations rate, oral corticosteroid dosage, FeNO, chronic mucous secretions, blood and sputum eosinophils were recorded at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

we included 32 patients (mean age: 52.3 ± 10, 59% female). 50% showed co-presence of bronchiectasis, (SEA + BE). Significant improvements were found in ACT [(13.8 ± 4.6 to 20.7 ± 4.1, p = 0.0009) and (13 ± 4.8 to 20.7 ± 4.6, p = 0.0003)], annual exacerbations rate [from 7 (4-12) to 0 (0.00-0.75) and from 8 (4-12) to 0 (0-1), p < 0.0001], and blood eosinophils count [748 cells/μL (400-1250) vs. 84 cells/μL (52.5-100), and from 691 cells/μL (405-798) vs. 60 cells/μL (41-105), p < 0.0001] in SEA and SEA + BE group respectively, already after 6 months of treatment. A reduction in daily oral corticosteroids intake at 12 months was shown [from 15 mg (0-25) to 0 mg (0-0), p = 0.003 and from 8.8 mg (0-25) to 0 mg (0-0) (p = 0.01)] in both SEA and SEA + BE, respectively. Similar results were found, comparing SEA + BE patients based on the severity of bronchiectasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab effectively improves asthma symptoms control, reducing annual exacerbations and corticosteroid intake in all patients with SEA, even in the subgroup with coexisting bronchiectasis, independently of their severity.

Utility of Bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) as prognostic tool in patients with post tubercular bronchiectasis: An experience from a tertiary care hospital in North India

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis severity Index (BSI) score which predicts the severity of the disease along with future exacerbations and mortality rate has been well validated in European patients; however there is paucity of data evaluating its validity in Indian patients. The authors therefore decided to evaluate the utility of BSI to predict exacerbations and mortality rate in patients with post tubercular bronchiectasis presenting to our facility.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective observational study done in patients with bronchiectasis secondary to tuberculosis. These patients were followed up for 4 years. BSI was calculated from different variables and descriptive statistics along with regression analysis were used to evaluate utility of BSI.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients of post tubercular bronchiectasis were included in the study. Majority of our patients belonged to severe bronchiectasis group seen in 23 patients (48%) while those with mild and moderate bronchiectasis were seen in 13 (27%) and 12 (25%) patients respectively. The exacerbation rate in mild group was comparable to the predicted BSI exacerbation at 1 year while the predicted and observed rates were statistically significant for moderate and severe bronchiectasis group (p value < 0.05). Mortality rates at 1 year were comparable in all the groups of bronchiectasis while it was comparable only in mild and moderate group bronchiectasis at 4 years.

CONCLUSION

Bronchiectasis severity index seems to predict mortality at 1 year in post tuberculosis bronchiectasis. However, it under predicts 1 year and 4 year exacerbation rates. Hence BSI may not be useful as a prognostic tool in Indian patients with bronchiectasis. Larger multi-centred studies may be required to further evaluate the clinical utility of BSI among Indian population.