Reduced bronchodilator reversibility correlates with non-type 2 high asthma and future exacerbations: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Given that airway obstruction in asthma is not always fully reversible, reduced bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) may be a special asthma phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics of BDR^high/low phenotypes (defined using two BDR criteria) and their associations with asthma exacerbations (AEs).

METHODS

After baseline assessments, all patients were classified into BDR^high or BDR^low phenotypes. This study consisted of 2 parts. Part I was a 12-month prospective observational cohort study designed to identify the clinical characteristics and associations with future AEs in BDR^high/low phenotypes (n = 456). Part II, designed as a post hoc analysis of the data obtained in Part I, was conducted to assess the association between BDR^high/low phenotypes and treatment responsiveness (n = 360).

RESULTS

Subjects with BDR^low phenotypes had better baseline asthma symptom control and was negatively associated with eosinophilic asthma and type 2 (T2) high asthma. During the 12-month follow-up, those with BDR^low phenotypes had a higher risk of severe AEs (SAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR_adj = 2.24, 95% CI = [1.25, 3.68]; Ward's criterion: RR_adj = 2.46, 95% CI = [1.40, 4.00]) and moderate-to-severe AEs (MSAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR_adj = 1.83, 95% CI = [1.22, 2.56]; Ward's criterion: RR_adj = 1.94, 95% CI = [1.32, 2.68]) in the following year according to logistic regression models. Similar findings were obtained with negative binominal regression models. BDR^low phenotype was a risk factor for an insensitive response to anti-asthma treatment (guideline-based criterion: OR_adj = 1.96, 95% CI = [1.05, 3.65]; Ward's criterion: OR_adj = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.12, 3.58]).

CONCLUSION

We identified that BDR^low phenotype was associated with non-T2 high asthma and future AEs. These findings have clinically relevant implications for asthma management.

Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol according to the degree of reversibility of airflow limitation at screening: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX trial

Background

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the relationship between short-term bronchodilator reversibility and longer-term response to bronchodilators is unclear. Here, we investigated whether the efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators is associated with reversibility of airflow limitation in patients with COPD with a low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

Methods

The double-blind, double-dummy EMAX trial randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 µg once daily, umeclidinium 62.5 µg once daily, or salmeterol 50 µg twice daily. Bronchodilator reversibility to salbutamol was measured once at screening and defined as an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) of ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL 10−30 min post salbutamol. Post hoc, fractional polynomial (FP) modelling was conducted using the degree of reversibility (mL) at screening as a continuous variable to investigate its relationship to mean change from baseline in trough FEV₁ and self-administered computerised-Transition Dyspnoea Index (SAC-TDI) at Week 24, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms-COPD (E-RS) at Weeks 21–24, and rescue medication use (puffs/day) over Weeks 1–24. Analyses were conducted across the full range of reversibility (−850–896 mL); however, results are presented for the range −100–400 mL because there were few participants with values outside this range.

Results

The mean (standard deviation) reversibility was 130 mL (156) and the median was 113 mL; 625/2425 (26%) patients were reversible. There was a trend towards greater improvements in trough FEV₁, SAC-TDI, E-RS and rescue medication use with umeclidinium/vilanterol with higher reversibility. Improvements in trough FEV₁ and reductions in rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol compared with either monotherapy across the range of reversibility. Greater improvements in SAC-TDI and E-RS total scores were observed with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in the middle of the reversibility range.

Conclusions

FP analyses suggest that patients with higher levels of reversibility have greater improvements in lung function and symptoms in response to bronchodilators. Improvements in lung function and rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy across the full range of reversibility, suggesting that the dual bronchodilator umeclidinium/vilanterol may be an appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic COPD, regardless of their level of reversibility.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01859-w.

Clinical and Inflammatory Features of Exacerbation-Prone Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Multidimensional Assessment

BACKGROUND

Reducing asthma exacerbations is a major target of current clinical guidelines, but identifying features of exacerbation-prone asthma (EPA) using multidimensional assessment (MDA) is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To systemically explore the clinical and inflammatory features of adults with EPA in a Chinese population.

METHODS

We designed a cross-sectional study using the Severe Asthma Web-based Database from the Australasian Severe Asthma Network (ASAN). Eligible Chinese adults with asthma (n = 546) were assessed using MDA. We stratified patients based on exacerbation frequency: none, few (1 or 2), and exacerbation prone (≥3). Univariate and multivariable negative binomial regression analyses were performed to investigate features associated with the frequency of exacerbations.

RESULTS

Of 546 participants, 61.9% had no exacerbations (n = 338), 29.6% had few exacerbations (n = 162), and 8.4% were exacerbation prone (n = 46) within the preceding year. EPA patients were characterized by elevated blood and sputum eosinophils but less atopy, with more controller therapies but worse asthma control and quality of life (all p < 0.05). In multivariable models, blood and sputum eosinophils (adjusted rate ratio = 2.23, 95% confidence interval = [1.26, 3.84] and 1.67 [1.27, 2.21], respectively), FEV1 (0.90 [0.84, 0.96]), bronchodilator responsiveness (1.16 [1.05, 1.27]), COPD (2.22 [1.41, 3.51]), bronchiectasis (2.87 [1.69, 4.89]), anxiety (2.56 [1.10, 5.95]), and depression (1.94 [1.20, 3.13]) were found. Further, upper respiratory tract infection (1.83 [1.32, 2.54]) and food allergy (1.67 [1.23, 2.25]) were at high risk of asthma symptom triggers.

CONCLUSION

EPA is a clinically recognizable phenotype associated with several recognizable traits that could be addressed by targeted treatment.

Bronchodilator Dose Responsiveness in Children and Adolescents: Clinical Features and Association with Future Asthma Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator reversibility measures are often associated with poor asthma outcomes in children. Whether bronchodilator dose responsiveness is similarly useful in children is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that children and adolescents requiring higher doses of bronchodilator to achieve maximal bronchodilation would have unique risk factors and increased risk of future exacerbation.

METHODS

Children (6-11 years, N = 299) and adolescents (12-21 years, N = 331) with confirmed asthma underwent clinical phenotyping procedures and a test of maximal bronchodilation with escalating doses of albuterol sulfate up to 720 mcg. Outcome measures were assessed at 12 months and included exacerbations treated with systemic corticosteroids, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma.

RESULTS

A total of 6.7% of children and 9.3% of adolescents had poor bronchodilator dose responsiveness, defined as attainment of maximal forced expiratory volume in 1 second with 720 mcg albuterol. Risk factors included type 2 inflammation, prior exacerbations, and greater asthma severity; historical pneumonia and tobacco exposure were also risk factors in children. Children and adolescents with poor bronchodilator dose responsiveness did not have increased current symptoms or impaired quality of life, but had approximately 2-fold increased odds of exacerbation or ED visit and approximately 3-fold increased odds of hospitalization by 12 months, independent of airflow obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchodilator dose responsiveness may be useful for phenotyping and may be of utility in practice and future studies focused on asthma outcomes or quantification of treatment responses. In children and adolescents, this phenotype of poor bronchodilator responsiveness may be associated with periods of relatively stable disease yet marked airway constriction in response to triggers, including tobacco smoke, respiratory infections/pneumonia, and aeroallergens.

Which bronchodilator reversibility criteria can predict severe acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?

Background

It is unclear whether various bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) criteria affect the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of positive BDR defined according to various BDR criteria on the risk of severe acute exacerbation (AE) in COPD patients.

Methods

Patients from four prospective COPD cohorts in South Korea who underwent follow-up for at least 1 year were enrolled in this study. The assessed BDR criteria included the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American College of Chest Physicians, (ACCP), major criteria of the Spanish definition of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), criteria compatible with ACOS in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), and European Respiratory Society (ERS). The rate of patients with severe AE who required hospitalization within 1 year due to BDR results according to each set of criteria was analyzed using logistic regression models.

Results

Among a total of 854 patients, the BDR-positive cases varied according to the criteria used. There was a 3.5% positive BDR rate according to GINA and a 29.9% rate according to the ATS criteria. Positive BDR according to the GOLD criteria was significantly associated with a decreased risk of severe AE (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.38; 95% Confidence interval (CI) = 0.15–0.93). This result remained statistically significant even in a sensitivity analysis that included only participants with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years and in the analysis for the propensity score-matched participants.

Conclusions

Among different criteria for positive BDR, the use of the GOLD ones was significantly associated with a decreased risk of severe AE in COPD patients. Increase use of ICS/LABA may have affected this relationship.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-017-0587-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.