Long-term Outcomes of Combined Endoscopic-Radiological Approach for the Management of Complete Transection of the Biliary Tract

BACKGROUND

Complete transection of the main bile duct (CTMD) is a major complication during hepato-bilio-pancreatic (HBP) surgery and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, a combined endoscopic-radiological approach (CERA) for minimally invasive treatment of CTMD has been introduced, but evidence on its long-term outcomes is limited. Our aim is to report efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of CERA for the management of post-surgical CTMD in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

All consecutive patients referred for CTMD after HBP surgery between February 2012 and January 2021 were included in this study. CERA was first performed to re-establish biliary tree continuity, and then multiple biliary plastic stents were deployed to guarantee biliary tree reconstruction. Anthropometric, clinical, procedural (endoscopic/radiologic/surgical), and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Each lesion was classified according to Strasberg classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 60 patients (age 60.5 years, range 28-91), 38 F (61.7%), underwent CERA. Mean interval from surgery to endoscopic treatment was 13.2 days. Mean treatment duration was 526 days (SD ± 415) with a median number of 8 endoscopic sessions (range 1-33). Mean length of the biliary defect was 17.6 mm (SD ± 11.5). Long-term clinical success was achieved in 33/49 (67.3%) of patients. Treatment failure was experienced in 16/49 (32.7%) patients, while after an average follow-up of 41 months, stricture recurrence was observed in 3/36 (8.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CERA is a minimally invasive and effective technique to re-establish the continuity of the biliary tract after CTMD, achieving permanent restoration in over half of treated patients.

The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL.

DESIGN

44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz).

RESULTS

The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower (i.e., better) than ASSR thresholds, whatever the frequency (1-2-3 kHz) and the side (right - left). A significant negative correlation is found between the difference score (ASSR - PTA) and the degree of hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10-13 dB.

Objective frequency-specific hearing thresholds definition for medicolegal purposes in case of occupational NIHL: ASSR outperforms CERA

Audiological use of the 40 Hz-ASSR (auditory steady state responses) could be valuable for objectively estimating the frequency-specific threshold in adults undergoing an expertise examination for medicolegal and/or compensation purposes. The present prospective study was set up to clarify the relationship between the thresholds obtained by cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) and by 40 Hz-ASSR, in the same ears, within a large homogeneous sample of 164 subjects (328 ears) with NIHL and well documented exposure to noise. All these subjects claimed financial compensation for occupational NIHL, and there was a suspicion of exaggeration of the reported NIHLs. ASSR thresholds show a good correlation with the CERA thresholds. However, a systematic shift is noticed, ASSR thresholds being on average (1–2 – 3 kHz) 4.38 dB lower (i.e. showing less hearing loss) than CERA thresholds. Moreover, the binaural multiple ASSR technique allows a considerable time gain when compared to the CERA.

A fast screening method for the detection of CERA in dried blood spots

Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) is a third‐generation erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent that was developed for the treatment of anemia. However, misuse of CERA for doping in endurance sports has been reported. Previous studies have shown blood as the matrix of choice for the detection of CERA, due to its high molecular weight. The use of dried blood spots (DBSs) for anti‐doping purposes constitutes a complementary approach to the standard urine and venous blood matrices and could facilitate sample collection and increase the number of blood samples available for analysis due to reduced costs of sample collection and transport. Here, we investigated whether CERA could be indirectly detected in extracts of single DBSs using an erythropoietin‐specific immunoassay that is capable of providing results within approximately 2 h. Reconstituted DBS samples were prepared from mixtures of red blood cell pellets and serum samples. The samples were collected in a previous clinical study in which six healthy volunteers were injected with a single, 200 μg dose of CERA. Using a commercially available ELISA kit, CERA was detected in the DBSs with a detection window of up to 20 days post‐injection. Furthermore, in order to demonstrate the fitness‐for‐purpose, three authentic doping control serum samples, which were identified as containing CERA, were analyzed by the presented methodological approach on DBS. The testing procedure described here could be used as a fast and cost‐effective method for the detection of CERA abuse in sport.

"Doctor, can I have less frequent injection with highly efficient treatment?" A patient centered study using an electronic choice-based conjoint analysis (ePRO) to assess real world preferences regarding erythropoiesis stimulating agent to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease (PERCEPOLIS study)

OBJECTIVES

Patient's perception analysis appears recently in numerous studies. Conjoint analysis has been used extensively by market researchers for studying how people value the characteristics of products and services. This technique was used in a clinical study to describe perceptions and preferences of anaemic patients suffering from chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKDnd), regarding erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA).

METHODS

PERCEPOLIS was a French multicenter prospective non-interventional study designed to describe the relative importance of ESA attributes according to CKDnD patients. Patients fulfilled questionnaires using an electronic device (digital tablet) at baseline and after 6 months under continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) treatment. Choice-based conjoint (CBC) questionnaires were developed with multiple components: 7 ESA attributes (2 or 3 levels per attribute), 2 partial profiles per task (2 out of the 7 attributes), and 7 tasks per questionnaire. Analyses were performed according to previous ESA treatment or not.

RESULTS

From 789 analyzed patients, 433 non ESA-naive patients were more than 80% to declare treatment efficacy as the most important expectative in ESA choice process (direct question) but CBC analyses revealed that frequency of injections was more crucial (relative mean weight: ∼30% versus ∼20% for efficacy). Pain at injection site and haemoglobin not exceeding the recommended target were confirmed as important criteria for patients (relative mean weights: ∼15%). No new or unexplained safety signals were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CBC design for the first time in a non-interventional ESA study with an electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) in an elderly population, these data showed that monthly injections and treatment efficacy were key patients' expectations relative to ESAs. CERA efficacy to maintain stable haemoglobin within the recommended range was confirmed in real-life conditions.

[Impact of comorbidities on hemoglobin stability in patients with chronic kidney insufficiency on hemodialysis, treated with CERA in current practice: The MIRIADE study]

This national, prospective and multicenter study aimed to describe the real-life impact of comorbidities on hemoglobin stability in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, treated with CERA in relay of an erythropoietin stimulating agent. Comorbidities were defined by the Charlson Index (adjusted on age) and hemoglobin stability as a variation of ±1g/dL after the 6-month treatment period. The 585 analyzed patients were distributed as follows according to the adjusted Charlson index: score≤3 (12% of patients), 4≤score≤5 (17%), 6≤score≤7 (31%) and score≥8 (40%). At CERA start, its median monthly dose was of 100μg for the overall population, with no changes during the treatment period and with little variation according to the comorbidity score. Patients with stable hemoglobin (56%, 67% if score≤3) were more numerous to reach the therapeutic target range between 10 and 12g/dL after 6 months (85% versus 43% if not stable hemoglobin). Patients with low C-reactive protein value (≤5mg/L ; P=0.04), no red blood cell transfusion (P=0.03), or no/low dose of intravenous iron (≤200mg ; P=0.03) were more likely to reach stable hemoglobin under CERA after 6 months. Among the 644 CERA-treated patients, 4 patients (<1%) had one serious adverse event related to treatment. A stable hemoglobin within the therapeutic target was reached in the majority of the patients after 6 months in current practice with a lower CERA dose, regardless of the comorbidities scores of patients on hemodialysis.

CERA Attenuates Kidney Fibrogenesis in the db/db Mouse by Influencing the Renal Myofibroblast Generation

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) is a pivotal pathophysiological process in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Multiple profibrotic factors and cell types, including transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and interstitial myofibroblasts, respectively, are responsible for the accumulation of extracellular matrix in the kidney. Matrix-producing myofibroblasts can originate from different sources and different mechanisms are involved in the activation process of the myofibroblasts in the fibrotic kidney. In this study, 16-week-old db/db mice, a model for type 2 DN, were treated for two weeks with continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), a synthetic erythropoietin variant with possible non-hematopoietic, tissue-protective effects. Non-diabetic and diabetic mice treated with placebo were used as controls. The effects of CERA on tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF) as well as on the generation of the matrix-producing myofibroblasts were evaluated by morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological methods. The placebo-treated diabetic mice showed significant signs of beginning renal TIF (shown by picrosirius red staining; increased connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), fibronectin and collagen I deposition; upregulated KIM1 expression) together with an increased number of interstitial myofibroblasts (shown by different mesenchymal markers), while kidneys from diabetic mice treated with CERA revealed less TIF and fewer myofibroblasts. The mechanisms, in which CERA acts as an anti-fibrotic agent/drug, seem to be multifaceted: first, CERA inhibits the generation of matrix-producing myofibroblasts and second, CERA increases the ability for tissue repair. Many of these CERA effects can be explained by the finding that CERA inhibits the renal expression of the cytokine TGF-β1.

Epoetin beta pegol alleviates oxidative stress and exacerbation of renal damage from iron deposition, thereby delaying CKD progression in progressive glomerulonephritis rats

The increased deposition of iron in the kidneys that occurs with glomerulopathy hinders the functional and structural recovery of the tubules and promotes progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here, we evaluated whether epoetin beta pegol (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator: CERA), which has a long half‐life in blood and strongly suppresses hepcidin‐25, exerts renoprotection in a rat model of chronic progressive glomerulonephritis (cGN). cGN rats showed elevated urinary total protein excretion (uTP) and plasma urea nitrogen (UN) from day 14 after the induction of kidney disease (day 0) and finally declined into end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD), showing reduced creatinine clearance with glomerulosclerosis, tubular dilation, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. A single dose of CERA given on day 1, but not on day 16, alleviated increasing uTP and UN, thereby delaying ESKD. In the initial disease phase, CERA significantly suppressed urinary 8‐OHdG and liver‐type fatty acid–binding protein (L‐FABP), a tubular damage marker. CERA also inhibited elevated plasma hepcidin‐25 levels and alleviated subsequent iron accumulation in kidneys in association with elevated urinary iron excretion and resulted in alleviation of growth of Ki67‐positive tubular and glomerular cells. In addition, at day 28 when the exacerbation of uTP occurs, a significant correlation was observed between iron deposition in the kidney and urinary L‐FABP. In our study, CERA mitigated increasing kidney damage, thereby delaying CKD progression in this glomerulonephritis rat model. Alleviation by CERA of the exacerbation of kidney damage could be attributable to mitigation of tubular damage that might occur with lowered iron deposition in tubules.

[Predictors of response to the CERA in chronic hemodialysis treatment-naive by erythropoiesis-stimulating agent]

La correction et la stabilité du taux d'hémoglobine est un objectif majeur du traitement de l'anémie chez les hémodialysés chroniques. Toutefois, la cible d'hémoglobine > 11g/dl fixée par les recommandations demeure difficile à atteindre dans notre contexte. Le but de cette étude est d’évaluer la réponse au traitement par CERA (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator) chez une population d'hémodialysés chroniques naïfs de tout traitement par agent stimulant de l’érythropoïèse et étudier les différents facteurs associés à une mauvaise réponse au traitement. Il s'agit une étude prospective mono centrique faite au sein d'une population d’ hémodialysés chroniques. Ont été inclus les patients en hémodialyse depuis plus de 12 mois, naïfs de tout traitement par agent stimulant de l’érythropoïèse (ASE) et ayant un taux d'hémoglobine(Hb) < 10g/dl. L'administration régulière de la CERA et l'ajustement des doses ont été faits selon les recommandations. L’évaluation de la réponse, en fin de traitement, a porté sur l'atteinte ou non d'un taux d'hémoglobine cible > 11g/dl. Sur 87 patients en hémodialyse périodique, 22 (25,3%) sont naïfs de tout traitement par ASE. Il s'agit de 13 hommes et 9 femmes avec un âge moyen de 46 ± 19 ans et une ancienneté en hémodialyse de 67 ± 59 mois. Le taux initial d'hémoglobine est de 7,8 ± 1,3 g/dl. Au bout de 4 mois de traitement régulier par la CERA, le taux final d'Hb est de 10,9 ± 2,1g/dl et 63,6% des patients ont atteint la cible d'Hb > 11g/dl. La dose moyenne de CERA à la fin de l’étude est de 0,89 ± 0,35 µg/kg/15j. L'analyse des facteurs prédictifs montre que la réponse finale dépend du taux d'Hb initial (p = 0,002). En effet, quand le taux d'Hb initial est > 8 g/dl, le taux de réponse est de 88% vs 46% lorsque le taux d'Hb < 8g/dl (p1-3]. Cette complication commune de la maladie rénale chronique est multifactorielle dont le déficit en érythropoïétine est le principal facteur causal [4]. Dès l'avènement des agents stimulants de l’érythropoïèse (ASE) en 1980 et le développement des recommandations de bonnes pratiques médicales, la gestion de l'anémie rénale est devenue meilleure avec une amélioration de la qualité de vie des patients [5–9]. Les recommandations de bonne pratique suggèrent actuellement le maintien de l'Hb à un taux > 11 g/dl sans dépasser 13 g/dl [9, 10]. Cependant, le maintien d'un taux d'hémoglobine stable nécessite du temps, des ressources humaines et financières et exige des adaptations thérapeutiques fréquentes [11]. Le méthoxy polyéthylène glycol-époétine bêta, activateur continu du récepteur de l’érythropoïétine (C.E.R.A), est un nouvel ASE qui permet la correction de l'anémie et la stabilité du taux d'hémoglobine au rythme d'une injection mensuelle [12]. Le but de cette étude est d’évaluer la réponse au traitement par CERA chez une population d'hémodialysés chroniques naïfs de tout traitement par ASE et d’étudier les différents facteurs associés à la mauvaise réponse au traitement

Dose equivalence between continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), Darbepoetin and Epoetin in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a prevalent situation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can be well managed with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) has a long half-life that allows to be administered once monthly. The lowest recommended dose for patients with non dialysis CKD is 120 μg per month. The objectives were to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous monthly dosing of CERA in CKD stages 4 and 5 not on dialysis, and to determine the equivalent dose to epoetin β and darbepoetin α.

METHODS

This is a cohort study. A 30-patient group that ESAs was changed to CERA (μg/month) was used as treatment group. We used the following clinically-based equivalent dosing: epoetin β (IU/week) and darbepoetin α (μg/week): 3000/15= 50; 4000/20=75; 6000/30=100; 8000/40=150. Another group of 30 patients with similar characteristics was used as control group and received the same epoetin β and darbepoetin α doses.

RESULTS

The mean CERA initial dose and at 6 months was 81.9 ± 35.2 and 82.0 ± 37.82 μg/month (p=0.37). The mean erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and hemoglobin at baseline and at 6 months in the CERA group and in the control group were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Monthly dosing treatment with CERA is safe and effective. A dose of 75-100 μg/month is enough to maintain stable levels of hemoglobin. Hippokratia 2014; 18 (4): 315-318.

Cost-effectiveness of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in anemia

Background

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the mainstay of anemia therapy. Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) is a highly effective, long-acting ESA developed for once-monthly dosing. A multitude of clinical studies has evaluated the safety and efficiency of this treatment option for patients with renal anemia. In times of permanent financial pressure on health care systems, the cost-effectiveness of CERA should be of particular importance for payers and clinicians.

Objective

To critically analyze, from the nephrologists’ point of view, the published literature focusing on the cost-effectiveness of CERA for anemia treatment.

Methods

The detailed literature search covered electronic databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase, as well as international conference abstract databases.

Results

Peer-reviewed literature analyzing the definite cost-effectiveness of CERA is scarce, and most of the available data originate from conference abstracts. Identified data are restricted to the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney disease. Although the majority of studies suggest a considerable cost advantage for CERA, the published literature cannot easily be compared. While time and motion studies clearly indicate that a switch to CERA could minimize health care staff time in dialysis units, the results of studies comparing direct costs are more ambivalent, potentially reflecting the differences between health care systems and variability between centers.

Conclusion

Analyzed data are predominantly insufficient; they miss clear evidence and have to thus be interpreted with great caution. In this day and age of financial restraints, results from well-designed, head-to-head studies with clearly defined endpoints have to prove whether CERA therapy can achieve cost savings without compromising anemia management.