Simulation training for lobectomy: a review of current literature and future directions†

With growing work-time restrictions and public expectations, the Halstedian educational model of 'see one, do one, teach one' is unfit for the modern training of thoracic residents. With the cardiothoracic surgical workforce set to decline by 50% over the next 10 years, new models are desperately needed to help trainees bypass the early error-prone phase of the lobectomy learning curve. In this review, we detail the development and validation of numerous simulators designed to teach trainees an array of skills ranging from basic technical skills to more complex non-technical skills. Given the recent increases in minimally invasive lobectomies, we critique both open and thoracoscopic simulators. We elucidate that whilst there are a growing number of thoracic simulators of varying fidelity available, fundamentally, there is currently a significant lack of well-designed trials validating various simulators for teaching lobectomy despite an awareness of their potential to improve surgical education. Furthermore, there is a void in the simulation training of non-technical skills within thoracic surgery. Encouragingly, there is a definite awareness of the ability of simulation to aid with the training of future thoracic surgical trainees.

Massive blood loss protocol 'Code Red' at Papworth Hospital: A closed loop audit

Aim

To investigate if the massive blood loss protocol ‘Code Red’ at a specialist cardiothoracic hospital was activated according to local and national guidelines by a closed loop audit.

Methods

Electronic and paper patient care systems were searched in 2015 and 2018 to access records for the ‘Code Red’ activations. Activation of the massive blood loss protocol was compared against the national standards set by The British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The percentage of cases meeting each of the ten standards in the specialist cardiac unit’s Protocol for the Management of Massive Blood Loss in Adults (adapted from the national standards) were evaluated.

Results

‘Code Red’ protocol was activated on 18 occasions in 2015 and nine occasions in 2018, representing just 0.83 and 0.26% of emergency surgeries, respectively. Between 2015 and 2018, there was a 6% increase of ‘Code Red’ cases being appropriately activated, a 26% increase in the prompt notification of the haematology department upon activation, alongside a 30% increase in the timely delivery of blood products, and a 25% decrease in the average amount of blood transferred prior to ‘Code Red’ activation.

Conclusion

There has been an improvement in the standards of care and management of massive blood loss this specialist cardiac centre despite the target timeframe being reduced from 30 to 15min between 2015 and 2018. Preparation for and anticipation of massive blood loss has likely decreased the number of incidences requiring ‘Code Red’ activation, permitting delivery of safe patient care.

Introduction of a new ward round approach in a cardiothoracic critical care unit

BACKGROUND

Francis (2013) described inconsistent ward rounds and failures to conduct ward rounds properly as contributing factors to the poor care seen at the Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. He suggested that the absence of a nurse at the bedside had clear consequences for communication, ward round efficiency and patient safety. He recommended that nurses should be actively involved in ward rounds and linked this to high quality patient care.

AIM

To share an experience of introducing a ward round checklist, a bedside nurse verbal summary and the development of standard operating procedure for Ward Rounds in cardiothoracic critical care unit to improve patient safety and care.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Semi structured interviews of six registered nurses. A questionnaire to 69 registered nurses. An electronic questionnaire sent to 23 members of the MDT. An observational audit of seven ward rounds reviewing 69 patients.

RESULTS

97% of nurses agreed that verbal summarizing had improved clarity and 90% felt that it had improved patient care. 87% of the MDT respondents stated that they had noticed an improvement in the attendance of the bedside nurse at the ward round review. The ward round checklist reduced omissions. Communication with patients during ward rounds was an area which needed to be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of a new ward round approach and audit of its practice has enabled an improvement in the quality of patient care by: Giving more opportunity for the nurse to participate and feel part of the ward round. Reduction of omissions through the use of a ward round checklist. Improved clarity among the MDT by the use of bedside nurse verbal summarizing of the plan of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses' full participation in ward rounds is essential to ensure effective communication and enhance patient safety.