Optic Foraminotomy versus Anterior Clinoidectomy for Small Superior-Projecting Paraclinoid Aneurysms: Visual and Angiographic Outcome Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Optic foraminotomy (OF) has been recently proposed as an alternative to anterior clinoidectomy (AC) for selected types of paraclinoid aneurysms. In this study, OF and AC were compared for small superior-projecting paraclinoid aneurysms assuming visual and angiographic results as outcome measures. Indications for OF are also discussed.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent surgery for a paraclinoid aneurysm in the last 10 years were collected across 3 tertiary hospitals. Small to regular-size and superior projecting aneurysms were sorted. Multiple and complex aneurysms were excluded. Records of patients who went through OF were compared with those of patients who underwent AC. Neurologic outcome was reported as a modified Rankin Scale. Aneurysm complete occlusion rate and rate of approach-related worsened vision were selected as outcome measures of efficacy and safety, respectively, of the OF versus AC. Unpaired t test and χ² test were used for numerical and categorical variables, respectively. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

OF and AC groups involved 18 and 25 patients, respectively. Complication rate, overall neurologic outcome, rate of approach-related worsened vision, and complete occlusion rate did not differ between the groups. The average follow-up was 51 ± 34 and 60 ± 41 months in the OF and AC groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to AC, OF did not show either a higher rate of approach-related worsened vision or a lower aneurysm complete occlusion rate. OF can be considered a valid alternative to the AC for small superior-projecting dorsal ICA wall paraclinoid aneurysms.

Predictors for ophthalmic segment aneurysms recanalization after coiling and flow diverter embolization in 6- and 12-month follow-up

Carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms are indication for endovascular treatment. Coil embolization is associated with a high recanalization rate and thus usage of flow diverter (FD) could constitute the treatment of choice. Although implementation of FD is very effective, it carries a significant risk of complications. The goal of our study was to find a radiological recanalization marker in order to facilitate decision process which would result in fewer treatment-related complications and in this way, to personalize endovascular therapy. We made a retrospective analysis of seventy-five patients with saccular carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms treated endovascularly. Morphometric measurements were performed in CTA 3D aneurysm models. The aneurysm size and volume were measured on the base of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. The treatment effectiveness was determined visually using the modified Raymond Roy classification after embolization and on the 6- and 12-month follow-up DSA. Statistica 13.1 software was used. Multivariate analyses showed that the aneurysm neck size (OR 2.51; 95%CI: 1.20-5.26), aspect ratio (OR 2.60; 95%CI: 1.27-5.21) and neck to parent artery ratio (OR 2.68; 95%CI: 1.26-5.70) were risk factors for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms recanalization after 6 months. Of those factors, aneurysm neck size remained the only significant risk factor for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms recanalization after 12 months (OR 5.23, 95%CI: 1.71-15.93). Various factors seem to influence recanalization. Preoperatively, if the above-mentioned predictors of recanalization are present, coiling is burdened with a high recanalization rate. In those cases, FD embolization should be considered.