1
|
Formica MK, Cox R, Christiana J, Turk MA, Landes SD. Covid-19 patterns among adults with intellectual and developmental disability and the general population in New York state during the first year of the pandemic. Disabil Health J 2024:101623. [PMID: 38631971 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the US, especially those living in group homes, experienced comparatively higher Covid-19 case/case fatality rates than the general population during the first year of the pandemic. There is no information about the patterns of case/case fatality rates during this time. OBJECTIVE This study compared Covid-19 case/case fatality rates among people with IDD living in residential group homes to the general population across the first year of the pandemic in New York State (NYS). METHODS Covid-19 positive cases and deaths collected from New York Disability Advocates (NYDA), a coalition of organizations serving individuals with IDD, was compared to data for the NYS general population from the first pandemic year. Case rates/100,000 and case fatality rates were calculated for the study period. Joinpoint Trend Analysis Software was used to analyze patterns in weekly case/case fatality rates. RESULTS Case fatality rates for people with IDD were higher than for the overall state population throughout the pandemic's first year. Case rates were higher among people with IDD across most of this year. Although the patterns in rates were similar, there was a sharp increase in cases for those with IDD during Fall 2020 beginning eight weeks before the general NYS population and a significant decrease in fatalities in late December 2020 into January 2021. CONCLUSIONS Consistently higher case fatality rates and significant differences in case/case fatality rates for people with IDD living in group homes require further consideration. Planning for future emergencies will require an enhanced federal/state understanding of the needs of people with IDD and a responsive surveillance system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret K Formica
- Departments of Public Health & Preventive Medicine and Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA
| | - Ryan Cox
- New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD), Albany, NY, 12229, USA
| | | | - Margaret A Turk
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
| | - Scott D Landes
- Department of Sociology and Aging Studies Institute, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torres ME, Brolin M, Panas L, Ritter G, Hodgkin D, Lee M, Merrick E, Horgan C, Hopwood JC, Gewirtz A, De Marco N, Lane N. Evaluating the feasibility and impact of case rate payment for recovery support navigator services: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1004. [PMID: 33143701 PMCID: PMC7607694 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05861-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute 24-h detoxification services (detox) are necessary but insufficient for many individuals working towards long-term recovery from opiate, alcohol or other drug addiction. Longer engagement in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment can lead to better health outcomes and reductions in overall healthcare costs. Connecting individuals with post-detox SUD treatment and supportive services is a vital next step. Toward this end, the Massachusetts Medicaid program reimburses Community Support Program staff (CSPs) to facilitate these connections. CSP support services are typically paid on a units-of-service basis. As part of a larger study testing health care innovations, one large Medicaid insurer developed a new cadre of workers, called Recovery Support Navigators (RSNs). RSNs performed similar tasks to CSPs but received more extensive training and coaching and were paid an experimental case rate (a flat negotiated reimbursement). This sub-study evaluates the feasibility and impact of case rate payments for RSN services as compared to CSP services paid fee-for-service. Methods We analyzed claims data and RSN service data for a segment of the Massachusetts Medicaid population who had more than one detox admission in the last year and also engaged in post-discharge CSP or RSN services. Qualitative data from key informant interviews and Learning Collaboratives with CSPs and RSNs supplemented the findings. Results Clients receiving RSN services under the case rate utilized the service significantly longer than clients receiving CSP services under unit-based billing. This resulted in a lower average cost per member per month for RSN clients. However, when calculating total SUD treatment costs per member, RSN client costs were 50% higher than CSP client costs. Provider organizations employing RSNs successfully implemented case rate billing. Benefits included allowing time for outreach efforts and training and coaching, activities not paid under the unit-based system. Yet, RSNs identified staffing and larger systems level challenges to consider when using a case rate payment model. Conclusions Addiction is a chronic disease that requires long-term investments. Case rate billing offers a promising option for payers and providers as it promotes continued engagement with service providers. To fully realize the benefits of case rate billing, however, larger systems level changes are needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05861-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E Torres
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. .,Smith College School for Social Work, Lilly Hall, Northampton, MA, 01060, USA.
| | - Mary Brolin
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Lee Panas
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Grant Ritter
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Dominic Hodgkin
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Margaret Lee
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Elizabeth Merrick
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Constance Horgan
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Jonna C Hopwood
- Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership, a Beacon Health Options company, 1000 Washington Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Andrea Gewirtz
- Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership, a Beacon Health Options company, 1000 Washington Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Natasha De Marco
- Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy Lane
- Brandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| |
Collapse
|