Olivier RC, Wickman M, Skinner C, Ablir L. The impact of replacing peripheral intravenous catheters when clinically indicated on infection rate, nurse satisfaction, and costs in CCU, Step-Down, and Oncology units.
Am J Infect Control 2021;
49:327-332. [PMID:
32763345 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.036]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
A practice change of replacing peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters when clinically indicated was implemented concurrent with a new PIV chlorhexidine securement dressing and existing IV care bundle to prevent the risk of infection.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of replacing PIV catheters when clinically indicated on infection rates, nurse satisfaction, and costs in 3 high-risk, vulnerable hospital populations (Critical Care, Step Down, and Oncology units).
METHODS
A retrospective review of 473 medical records, 737 peripheral IV sites, and 2 nursing surveys were completed after the practice change. Data were gathered related to PIV 1) catheter dwell times, 2) phlebitis rates, 3) catheter-related bloodstream infection rates, 4) skin tears related to the new PIV dressing, 5) costs, and 6) a nurse satisfaction survey.
RESULTS
The average PIV dwell time was 7 days with a 3% phlebitis rate. Findings showed no catheter-related bloodstream infections and 2 (0.27%) skin tears. Cost savings of $17,100.00 in PIV supplies occurred one year after the practice change. Nurse satisfaction with the new dressing was 94.2%, with a 17-month sustainment of satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS
The impact of the practice change and new dressing had positive quality outcomes on infection rate, nurse satisfaction, and costs in 3 vulnerable hospital populations.
Collapse