1
|
Areces-Gonzalez A, Paz-Linares D, Riaz U, Wang Y, Li M, Razzaq FA, Bosch-Bayard JF, Gonzalez-Moreira E, Ontivero-Ortega M, Galan-Garcia L, Martínez-Montes E, Minati L, Valdes-Sosa MJ, Bringas-Vega ML, Valdes-Sosa PA. CiftiStorm pipeline: facilitating reproducible EEG/MEG source connectomics. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1237245. [PMID: 38680452 PMCID: PMC11047451 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1237245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
We present CiftiStorm, an electrophysiological source imaging (ESI) pipeline incorporating recently developed methods to improve forward and inverse solutions. The CiftiStorm pipeline produces Human Connectome Project (HCP) and megconnectome-compliant outputs from dataset inputs with varying degrees of spatial resolution. The input data can range from low-sensor-density electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings without structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) to high-density EEG/MEG recordings with an HCP multimodal sMRI compliant protocol. CiftiStorm introduces a numerical quality control of the lead field and geometrical corrections to the head and source models for forward modeling. For the inverse modeling, we present a Bayesian estimation of the cross-spectrum of sources based on multiple priors. We facilitate ESI in the T1w/FSAverage32k high-resolution space obtained from individual sMRI. We validate this feature by comparing CiftiStorm outputs for EEG and MRI data from the Cuban Human Brain Mapping Project (CHBMP) acquired with technologies a decade before the HCP MEG and MRI standardized dataset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariosky Areces-Gonzalez
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- School of Technical Sciences, University “Hermanos Saiz Montes de Oca” of Pinar del Río, Pinar del Rio, Cuba
| | - Deirel Paz-Linares
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Department of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neurosciences Center, Havana, Cuba
| | - Usama Riaz
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Wang
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Min Li
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fuleah A. Razzaq
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard
- McGill Centre for Integrative Neurosciences MCIN, LudmerCentre for Mental Health, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eduardo Gonzalez-Moreira
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | - Marlis Ontivero-Ortega
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Department of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neurosciences Center, Havana, Cuba
| | | | | | - Ludovico Minati
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Maria L. Bringas-Vega
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Department of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neurosciences Center, Havana, Cuba
| | - Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Sciences Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Department of Neuroinformatics, Cuban Neurosciences Center, Havana, Cuba
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parvathaneni P, Lyu I, Huo Y, Rogers BP, Schilling KG, Nath V, Blaber JA, Hainline AE, Anderson AW, Woodward ND, Landman BA. Improved gray matter surface based spatial statistics in neuroimaging studies. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 61:285-95. [PMID: 31128227 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging often involves acquiring high-resolution anatomical images along with other low-resolution image modalities, like diffusion and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performing gray matter statistics with low-resolution image modalities is a challenge due to registration artifacts and partial volume effects. Gray matter surface based spatial statistics (GS-BSS) has been shown to provide higher sensitivity using gray matter surfaces compared to that of skeletonization approach of gray matter based spatial statistics which is adapted from tract based spatial statistics in diffusion studies. In this study, we improve upon GS-BSS incorporating neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) based search (denoted N-GSBSS) by 1) enhancing metrics mapping from native space, 2) incorporating maximum orientation dispersion index (ODI) search along surface normal, and 3) proposing applicability to other modalities, such as functional MRI (fMRI). We evaluated the performance of N-GSBSS against three baseline pipelines: volume-based registration, FreeSurfer's surface registration and ciftify pipeline for fMRI and simulation studies. First, qualitative mean ODI results are shown for N-GSBSS with and without NODDI based search in comparison with ciftify pipeline. Second, we conducted one-sample t-tests on working memory activations in fMRI to show that the proposed method can aid in the analysis of low resolution fMRI data. Finally we performed a sensitivity test in a simulation study by varying percentage change of intensity values within a region of interest in gray matter probability maps. N-GSBSS showed higher sensitivity in the simulation test compared to the other methods capturing difference between the groups starting at 10% change in the intensity values. The computational time of N-GSBSS is 68 times faster than that of traditional surface-based or 86 times faster than that of ciftify pipeline analysis.
Collapse
|