Evidence-Based Medicine and Pharmacotherapy Content Alignment

OBJECTIVE

When effectively executed, content alignment can aid student performance in associated courses. Limited research exists for content alignment of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and pharmacotherapy courses. This study assesses the impact of EBM and pharmacotherapy course alignment on student performance.

METHODS

Content alignment included assignment of 6 landmark trials in EBM coursework. The articles were identified by pharmacotherapy instructors as "landmark" to management of associated diseases in the aligned pharmacotherapy semester. Articles were the basis for quizzes over skills taught in the EBM course and were referenced during pharmacotherapy lectures.

RESULTS

During the alignment semester, students were more likely to cite specific guidelines and/or primary literature to rationalize pharmacotherapeutic plans on examinations compared with the prealignment period (54% vs 34%). Overall, pharmacotherapy case performance and plan rationale scores were significantly higher in the alignment semester compared with prealignment. Student performance on the Assessing Competency in Evidence-Based Medicine tool improved from the start of the semester (8.64, SD 1.66) to the end (9.5, SD 1.49; mean score +0.86). Comfort in applying EBM analysis to primary literature increased significantly between the first and final assignments, with 6.7% and 71.7% of students self-reporting a high degree of confidence, respectively. Students (73%) reported an enhanced understanding of pharmacotherapy due to alignment compared with a previous semester of pharmacotherapy without alignment.

CONCLUSION

The use of landmark trial assignments to align EBM and pharmacotherapy coursework demonstrated a positive impact on student rationale for clinical decision-making and student confidence in evaluating primary literature.

Developing a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Selection of Virtual Reality Drills for Content Alignment

INTRODUCTION

Despite the importance of simulation-based training for robotic surgery, there is no consensus about its training curricula. Recently, a virtual reality (VR) platform (SimNow, Intuitive, Inc) was introduced with 33 VR drills but without evidence of their validity. As part of our creating a new robotic VR curriculum, we assessed the drills' validity through content mapping and the alignment between learning goals and drill content.

METHODS

Three robotically trained surgeons content-mapped all 33 drills for how well the drills incorporated 15 surgery skills and also rated the drills' difficulty, usefulness, relevance, and uniqueness. Drills were added to the new curriculum based on consensus about ratings and historic learner data. The drills were grouped according to similar skill sets and arranged in order of complexity.

RESULTS

The 33 drills were judged to have 12/15 surgery skills as primary goals and 13/15 as secondary goals. Twenty of the 33 drills were selected for inclusion in the new curriculum; these had 11/15 skills as primary goals and 11/15 as secondary goals. However, skills regarding energy sources, atraumatic handling, blunt dissection, fine dissection, and running suturing were poorly represented in the drills. Three previously validated inanimate drills were added to the curriculum to address lacking skill domains.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 20 of the 33 SimNow drills as a foundation for a robotic surgery curriculum based on content-oriented evidence. We added 3 other drills to address identified gaps in drill content.