1
|
Shin TH, Dang J, Howell M, Husain FA, Ghanem OM, GBittner J, Eckhouse SR, Fearing N, Elli E, Hussain M, Galvani C, Johnson S, Chand B, Pandya Y, Rogers AM, Kroh M, Kurian M. The SAGES MASTERS program bariatric surgery pathway selects 10 seminal publications on revisional bariatrics. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10811-0. [PMID: 38555320 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10811-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program designated bariatric surgery as a clinical pathway. Among the tiers of the Masters Program, revisional bariatric surgery is the highest tier of "mastery" within the pathway. This article presents the top 10 seminal studies representing the current landscape of revisional bariatrics. METHODS The literature was systematically searched and seminal articles designated by consensus agreement of the SAGES Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery committee using multiple criteria, including impact on the field, citation frequency, and expert opinion. Articles were reviewed by committee members and presented in summarized fashion. RESULTS The top 10 papers are presented in grouped thematic categories covering the early evolution of revisional bariatrics, changing criteria for reoperative bariatric surgery, divergence of revision versus conversion bariatric surgery, and recent technologic innovations in revisional bariatric surgery. Each summary is presented with expert appraisal and commentary. CONCLUSION These seminal papers represent a snapshot of the dynamic field of revisional bariatric surgery and emphasize the need to not only remain current with contemporary trends but also keep a patient-oriented perspective on patient and intervention selection for optimal success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Shin
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Jerry Dang
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melanie Howell
- Department of Surgery, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA
| | - Farah A Husain
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James GBittner
- Department of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Shaina R Eckhouse
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nicole Fearing
- Department of Surgery, HCA Midwest Health, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Enrique Elli
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mustafa Hussain
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Carlos Galvani
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Shaneeta Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bipan Chand
- Department of Surgery, Ascension Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yagnik Pandya
- Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann M Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Penn State, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Kroh
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marina Kurian
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spivak H, Giorgi M, Luhrs A. Conversion of gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch: safe and viable options. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:131-5. [PMID: 36414524 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains the most performed bariatric surgery. As numbers of SG increase, so do the numbers of patients requiring conversion for insufficient weight loss or weight regain. However, the literature has cited complication rates as high as 30% for reoperative bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVE With the recent inclusion of conversion surgery variables in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database, we compared the safety and efficacy of SG conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus biliopancreatic diversion and duodenal switch (BPD/DS). SETTING MBSAQIP database. METHODS Analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP Participant Use Files revealed 6020 patients who underwent SG conversion to RYGB (5348) and BPD/DS (672). We examined 30-day outcomes including death, anastomotic leak, readmission, any complication, dehydration, and weight loss. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (.12% versus 0%) or; complication rate (6.5% versus 5.1%) with SG conversion to RYGB or BPD/DS. There was a statistically significant difference in anastomotic leak (.5% versus 1.2%, P = .024). Interestingly, BPD/DS was less likely to require dehydration treatments (4.2% versus 2.2%, P = .009) and had fewer readmissions within 30 days (7.3% versus 5.4%, P = .043). CONCLUSIONS Complication rates after conversion of SG to RYGB or BPD/DS may be significantly lower than previously reported and only slightly higher than after primary weight loss surgery. SG conversion to either RYGB or BPD/DS remain safe, viable options for patients who had insufficient weight loss or regain, and BPD/DS may be the better option in the appropriate patient.
Collapse
|
3
|
Oyefule O, Do T, Karthikayen R, Portela R, Dayyeh BA, McKenzie T, Kellogg T, Ghanem OM. Secondary Bariatric Surgery-Does the Type of Index Procedure Affect Outcomes After Conversion? J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1830-1837. [PMID: 35715643 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05385-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although revisions account for 17% of cases performed at bariatric centers of excellence, scarce data exists on whether index operation type influences outcomes after secondary operations. OBJECTIVE We designed a study investigating the effect of primary procedure type on weight loss and perioperative complications after conversion bariatric surgery. SETTING Tertiary Referral Hospital, USA. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or adjustable gastric band (AGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2009 to 2019. Post-operatively, we measured short- and medium-term complications and changes in body weight at various time points. Univariate and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Forty-two (SG) patients and 116 (AGB) patients underwent conversion to RYGB, most commonly for GERD (57.1%) in SG patients vs. weight regain (77.6%) in AGB patients. Mean pre-conversion BMI was 36.7 kg/m2 (SG) vs 43.8 kg/m2 (AGB). Mean time to conversion (months) was 52.9 (SG) vs 94.7 (AGB). Complication rate was 9.5% (SG) vs 6% (AGB) at 30 days (p = 0.48) and 31%(SG) vs 14.5% (AGB) (p = 0.02) at 2 years. Mean post conversion %TWL was 11.6% (SG) vs 24.6% (AGB) in patients with GERD/dysphagia (p = 0.014) and 20.7% (SG) vs 27.6% (AGB) in patients converted for weight-related reasons (p = 0.027) at 1 year. Overall mean %TWL was 13.2% (SG) vs 24.7% (AGB) at 2 years (p < 0.0035). CONCLUSION After conversion to RYGB, patients with AGB experience better short- and medium-term weight loss than those with SG, even after accounting for conversion indications. SG to RYGB conversions have a higher resolution of reflux disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omobolanle Oyefule
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Timothy Do
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Raveena Karthikayen
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ray Portela
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Barham Abu Dayyeh
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Travis McKenzie
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Todd Kellogg
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|