1
|
Bonaiuto JJ, Afdideh F, Ferez M, Wagstyl K, Mattout J, Bonnefond M, Barnes GR, Bestmann S. Estimates of cortical column orientation improve MEG source inversion. Neuroimage 2020; 216:116862. [PMID: 32305564 PMCID: PMC8417767 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Determining the anatomical source of brain activity non-invasively measured from EEG or MEG sensors is challenging. In order to simplify the source localization problem, many techniques introduce the assumption that current sources lie on the cortical surface. Another common assumption is that this current flow is orthogonal to the cortical surface, thereby approximating the orientation of cortical columns. However, it is not clear which cortical surface to use to define the current source locations, and normal vectors computed from a single cortical surface may not be the best approximation to the orientation of cortical columns. We compared three different surface location priors and five different approaches for estimating dipole vector orientation, both in simulations and visual and motor evoked MEG responses. We show that models with source locations on the white matter surface and using methods based on establishing correspondences between white matter and pial cortical surfaces dramatically outperform models with source locations on the pial or combined pial/white surfaces and which use methods based on the geometry of a single cortical surface in fitting evoked visual and motor responses. These methods can be easily implemented and adopted in most M/EEG analysis pipelines, with the potential to significantly improve source localization of evoked responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Bonaiuto
- Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR5229, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, France.
| | - Fardin Afdideh
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France
| | - Maxime Ferez
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France
| | - Konrad Wagstyl
- University of Cambridge, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Jérémie Mattout
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France
| | - Mathilde Bonnefond
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France
| | - Gareth R Barnes
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK; Dept of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pizarro R, Richner T, Brodnick S, Thongpang S, Williams J, Van Veen B. Estimating cortical column sensory networks in rodents from micro-electrocorticograph (μECoG) recordings. Neuroimage 2017; 163:342-57. [PMID: 28951350 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Micro-electrocorticograph (μECoG) arrays offer the flexibility to record local field potentials (LFPs) from the surface of the cortex, using high density electrodes that are sub-mm in diameter. Research to date has not provided conclusive evidence for the underlying signal generation of μECoG recorded LFPs, or if μECoG arrays can capture network activity from the cortex. We studied the pervading view of the LFP signal by exploring the spatial scale at which the LFP can be considered elemental. We investigated the underlying signal generation and ability to capture functional networks by implanting, μECoG arrays to record sensory-evoked potentials in four rats. The organization of the sensory cortex was studied by analyzing the sensory-evoked potentials with two distinct modeling techniques: (1) The volume conduction model, that models the electrode LFPs with an electrostatic representation, generated by a single cortical generator, and (2) the dynamic causal model (DCM), that models the electrode LFPs with a network model, whose activity is generated by multiple interacting cortical sources. The volume conduction approach modeled activity from electrodes separated < 1000 μm, with reasonable accuracy but a network model like DCM was required to accurately capture activity > 1500 μm. The extrinsic network component in DCM was determined to be essential for accurate modeling of observed potentials. These results all point to the presence of a sensory network, and that μECoG arrays are able to capture network activity in the neocortex. The estimated DCM network models the functional organization of the cortex, as signal generators for the μECoG recorded LFPs, and provides hypothesis-testing tools to explore the brain.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chaimow D, Yacoub E, Uğurbil K, Shmuel A. Spatial specificity of the functional MRI blood oxygenation response relative to neuronal activity. Neuroimage 2017; 164:32-47. [PMID: 28882632 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Revised: 08/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous attempts at characterizing the spatial specificity of the blood oxygenation level dependent functional MRI (BOLD fMRI) response by estimating its point-spread function (PSF) have conventionally relied on retinotopic spatial representations of visual stimuli in area V1. Consequently, their estimates were confounded by the width and scatter of receptive fields of V1 neurons. Here, we circumvent these limits by instead using the inherent cortical spatial organization of ocular dominance columns (ODCs) to determine the PSF for both Gradient Echo (GE) and Spin Echo (SE) BOLD imaging at 7 Tesla. By applying Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling on a probabilistic generative model of imaging ODCs, we quantified the PSFs that best predict the spatial structure and magnitude of differential ODCs' responses. Prior distributions for the ODC model parameters were determined by analyzing published data of cytochrome oxidase patterns from post-mortem histology of human V1 and of neurophysiological ocular dominance indices. The average PSF full-widths at half-maximum obtained from differential ODCs' responses following the removal of voxels influenced by contributions from macroscopic blood vessels were 0.86 mm (SE) and 0.99 mm (GE). Our results provide a quantitative basis for the spatial specificity of BOLD fMRI at ultra-high fields, which can be used for planning and interpretation of high-resolution differential fMRI of fine-scale cortical organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Chaimow
- Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Kâmil Uğurbil
- Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Amir Shmuel
- Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA; McConnel Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaimow D, Uğurbil K, Shmuel A. Optimization of functional MRI for detection, decoding and high-resolution imaging of the response patterns of cortical columns. Neuroimage 2018; 164:67-99. [PMID: 28461061 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The capacity of functional MRI (fMRI) to resolve cortical columns depends on several factors. These include the spatial scale of the columnar pattern, the point-spread of the fMRI response, the voxel size, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) considering thermal and physiological noise. However, it remains unknown how these factors combine, and what is the voxel size that optimizes fMRI of cortical columns. Here we combine current knowledge into a quantitative model of fMRI of realistic patterns of cortical columns with different spatial scales and degrees of irregularity. We compare different approaches for identifying patterns of cortical columns, including univariate and multivariate based detection, multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) based decoding, and high-resolution imaging and reconstruction of the pattern of cortical columns. We present the dependence of the performance of each approach on the parameters of the imaged pattern as well as those of the data acquisition. In addition, we predict voxel sizes that optimize fMRI of cortical columns under various scenarios. We found that all measures associated with multivariate detection and decoding could be approximately calculated from a measure we termed "multivariate contrast-to-noise ratio" (mv-CNR), which is a function of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and number of voxels. Furthermore, mv-CNR implied that the optimal voxel width for detection and decoding is independent of changes in response amplitude, SNR and imaged volume that are not caused by changes in voxel size. For regular patterns, optimal voxel widths for detection, decoding and imaging/reconstructing the pattern of cortical columns were approximately half the main cycle length of the organization. Optimal voxel widths for irregular patterns were less dependent on the main cycle length, and differed between univariate detection, multivariate detection and decoding, and reconstruction. We compared the effects of different factors of Gradient Echo fMRI at 3 Tesla (T), Gradient Echo fMRI at 7T, and Spin-Echo fMRI at 7T on the detection, decoding, and reconstruction measures considered and found that in all cases the width of the fMRI point-spread had the most significant effect. In contrast, different response amplitudes and noise characteristics played a relatively minor role. We recommend specific voxel widths for optimal univariate detection, for multivariate detection and decoding, and for high-resolution imaging of cortical columns under these three data-acquisition scenarios. Our study supports the planning, optimization, and interpretation of high-resolution fMRI of cortical columns and the decoding of information conveyed by these columns.
Collapse
|
5
|
De Martino F, Yacoub E, Kemper V, Moerel M, Uludağ K, De Weerd P, Ugurbil K, Goebel R, Formisano E. The impact of ultra-high field MRI on cognitive and computational neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2017; 168:366-382. [PMID: 28396293 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The ability to measure functional brain responses non-invasively with ultra high field MRI (7 T and above) represents a unique opportunity in advancing our understanding of the human brain. Compared to lower fields (3 T and below), ultra high field MRI has an increased sensitivity, which can be used to acquire functional images with greater spatial resolution, and greater specificity of the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal to the underlying neuronal responses. Together, increased resolution and specificity enable investigating brain functions at a submillimeter scale, which so far could only be done with invasive techniques. At this mesoscopic spatial scale, perception, cognition and behavior can be probed at the level of fundamental units of neural computations, such as cortical columns, cortical layers, and subcortical nuclei. This represents a unique and distinctive advantage that differentiates ultra high from lower field imaging and that can foster a tighter link between fMRI and computational modeling of neural networks. So far, functional brain mapping at submillimeter scale has focused on the processing of sensory information and on well-known systems for which extensive information is available from invasive recordings in animals. It remains an open challenge to extend this methodology to uniquely human functions and, more generally, to systems for which animal models may be problematic. To succeed, the possibility to acquire high-resolution functional data with large spatial coverage, the availability of computational models of neural processing as well as accurate biophysical modeling of neurovascular coupling at mesoscopic scale all appear necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico De Martino
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 2021 sixth street SE, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 2021 sixth street SE, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Valentin Kemper
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Moerel
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Center for System Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kâmil Uludağ
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter De Weerd
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kamil Ugurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, 2021 sixth street SE, 55455 Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Rainer Goebel
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elia Formisano
- Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; Maastricht Center for System Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
In the primary visual cortex of many mammals, ocular dominance columns segregate information from the two eyes. Yet under controlled conditions, most human observers are unable to correctly report the eye to which a stimulus has been shown, indicating that this information is lost during subsequent processing. This study investigates whether eye-of-origin information is available in the pattern of electrophysiological activity evoked by visual stimuli, recorded using EEG and decoded using multivariate pattern analysis. Observers (N=24) viewed sine-wave grating and plaid stimuli of different orientations, shown to either the left or right eye (or both). Using a support vector machine, eye-of-origin could be decoded above chance at around 140 and 220ms post stimulus onset, yet observers were at chance for reporting this information. Other stimulus features, such as binocularity, orientation, spatial pattern, and the presence of interocular conflict (i.e. rivalry), could also be decoded using the same techniques, though all of these were perceptually discriminable above chance. A control analysis found no evidence to support the possibility that eye dominance was responsible for the eye-of-origin effects. These results support a structural explanation for multivariate decoding of electrophysiological signals - information organised in cortical columns can be decoded, even when observers are unaware of this information.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vadakkan KI. A framework for the first-person internal sensation of visual perception in mammals and a comparable circuitry for olfactory perception in Drosophila. Springerplus 2015; 4:833. [PMID: 26753120 PMCID: PMC4695467 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Perception is a first-person internal sensation induced within the nervous system at the time of arrival of sensory stimuli from objects in the environment. Lack of access to the first-person properties has limited viewing perception as an emergent property and it is currently being studied using third-person observed findings from various levels. One feasible approach to understand its mechanism is to build a hypothesis for the specific conditions and required circuit features of the nodal points where the mechanistic operation of perception take place for one type of sensation in one species and to verify it for the presence of comparable circuit properties for perceiving a different sensation in a different species. The present work explains visual perception in mammalian nervous system from a first-person frame of reference and provides explanations for the homogeneity of perception of visual stimuli above flicker fusion frequency, the perception of objects at locations different from their actual position, the smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements, the perception of object borders, and perception of pressure phosphenes. Using results from temporal resolution studies and the known details of visual cortical circuitry, explanations are provided for (a) the perception of rapidly changing visual stimuli, (b) how the perception of objects occurs in the correct orientation even though, according to the third-person view, activity from the visual stimulus reaches the cortices in an inverted manner and (c) the functional significance of well-conserved columnar organization of the visual cortex. A comparable circuitry detected in a different nervous system in a remote species-the olfactory circuitry of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster-provides an opportunity to explore circuit functions using genetic manipulations, which, along with high-resolution microscopic techniques and lipid membrane interaction studies, will be able to verify the structure-function details of the presented mechanism of perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunjumon I Vadakkan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave. Room A4-08, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ; Neurosearch Center, 76 Henry St., Toronto, ON M5T1X2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wanger T, Wetzel W, Scheich H, Ohl FW, Goldschmidt J. Spatial patterns of neuronal activity in rat cerebral cortex during non-rapid eye movement sleep. Brain Struct Funct 2015; 220:3469-84. [PMID: 25113606 PMCID: PMC4575691 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0867-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that cortical activity in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) is spatially homogeneous on the mesoscopic scale. This is partly due to the limited observational scope of common metabolic or imaging methods in sleep. We used the recently developed technique of thallium-autometallography (TlAMG) to visualize mesoscopic patterns of activity in the sleeping cortex with single-cell resolution. We intravenously injected rats with the lipophilic chelate complex thallium diethyldithiocarbamate (TlDDC) during spontaneously occurring periods of NREMS and mapped the patterns of neuronal uptake of the potassium (K+) probe thallium (Tl+). Using this method, we show that cortical activity patterns are not spatially homogeneous during discrete 5-min episodes of NREMS in unrestrained rats-rather, they are complex and spatially diverse. Along with a relative predominance of infragranular layer activation, we find pronounced differences in metabolic activity of neighboring neuronal assemblies, an observation which lends support to the emerging paradigm that sleep is a distributed process with regulation on the local scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Wanger
- Department Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Wolfram Wetzel
- Department Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Henning Scheich
- Emeritus Group Lifelong Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Frank W Ohl
- Department Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany
- Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Brain Science (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Goldschmidt
- Department Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Brenneckestraße 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany
- Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|