1
|
Wu R, Dong X, Xia B, Wang W, She X, Chu Z. Influence of different factors on coseismic deformation of the 2015 Mw7.8 earthquake in Nepal. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9613. [PMID: 38671146 PMCID: PMC11053086 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60084-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In Geophysics, topographic factors are observations that can be directly measured, but they are often ignored to simplify the model. Studying the coseismic deformation caused by earthquakes helps accurately determine the epicenter's parameterization. It provides a reference for the reasonable layout of coseismic observation stations and GNSS observation stations. After the Mw7.8 earthquake in Nepal in 2015, GCMT, USGS, GFZ, CPPT, and other institutions released their epicenter parameter. However, according to their parameters, the coseismic displacements simulated by the spectral-element method are quite different from the GNSS observations. Firstly, this paper inverts the geometric parameters of the seismogenic fault with Nepal's coseismic GNSS displacement. The spectral-element method determines the source's location and depth under the heterogeneous terrain and outputs the source parameters. Among the results of many studies, the surface source is more consistent with the generation mechanism of large earthquakes. Secondly, this paper calculates the fault slip distribution of this earthquake using SDM (Steepest Descent Method) based on GNSS and InSAR data, which is divided into 1500 subfaults, and the moment tensor of each subfault is calculated. This paper investigates the distribution characteristics of the coseismic deformation field of the 2015 Mw 7.8 earthquake in Nepal under three different models. The results show that the influence of topographic factors is ~ 20%, and the influence of heterogeneous factors is ~ 10%. This paper concludes that the influence of topographic factors is much more significant than that of heterogeneous factors, and the influence of both should be addressed in coseismic deformation calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Wu
- South Surveying and Mapping Technology CO., LTD, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Xibin Dong
- South Surveying and Mapping Technology CO., LTD, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Bo Xia
- Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China
| | - Weisi Wang
- South Surveying and Mapping Technology CO., LTD, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiayu She
- College of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - ZiMing Chu
- Henan Earthquake Agency, Zhengzhou, 450018, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hennings P, Staniewicz S, Smye K, Chen J, Horne E, Nicot JP, Ge J, Reedy R, Scanlon B. Development of complex patterns of anthropogenic uplift and subsidence in the Delaware Basin of West Texas and southeast New Mexico, USA. Sci Total Environ 2023; 903:166367. [PMID: 37633376 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
The Delaware Basin in west Texas and southeast New Mexico is now the largest global oil producing basin, averaging ∼400,000 m3 (∼2,500,000 barrels) per day in 2022. The shale-dominated strata targeted for production can co-produce 4-5 times more water than oil, necessitating disposal by injection of ∼1,400,000 m3 (∼8,700,000 barrels) of water per day in 2022. Through a comprehensive assimilation of regional Sentinel-1 satellite radar data and analysis of production and injection, we show how petroleum operations have caused the development of complex and accelerating patterns of surface deformation from 2015 through 2021. We observe uplift from reservoir swelling, subsidence from reservoir contraction, and the development of linear features that are indicative of faulting. Subsidence is predominantly caused by production, and an important finding of this study is that the magnitude of subsidence is linearly proportional to total production. Uplift is caused by pressurization from wastewater injection of shallow permeable strata. The patterns of uplift are complex and extend laterally well-beyond areas where injection was performed. Linear surface deformation features are observed throughout the Delaware Basin, and they are lengthening and densifying as uplift and subsidence accelerate. Many of the lineations can be linked to known strata-bounded faults and shallow seismicity in the southern Delaware Basin where they serve as permeable and anisotropic conduits for pore pressure migration. In the Northern Delaware Basin, co-seismic rupture is hosted along basement-rooted faults that may link to the linear surface features. Understanding these dynamic changes in Delaware Basin is a pressing concern for management of subsurface reservoirs and safeguarding the surface environment. Concerns include ongoing induced seismicity, hazard of drilling through over-pressured strata, maintenance of integrity for newer wellbores, mitigation of flows of brine and petroleum fluids at the surface of old wellbores, and management of the pore space resource for wastewater injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hennings
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America.
| | - Scott Staniewicz
- Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Katie Smye
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Jingyi Chen
- Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Horne
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Jean-Philippe Nicot
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Jun Ge
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Robert Reedy
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| | - Bridget Scanlon
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|