Device-based antegrade dissection re-entry versus parallel wire techniques for the percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions

BACKGROUND

Device-based antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) and parallel wire technique (PWT) are two important techniques in the antegrade approach in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO). The study is aimed to compare the procedural and mid-term outcomes between device-based ADR using the CrossBoss/Stingray system and PWT in CTO PCI.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent CTO PCI using device-based ADR or PWT. CTO due to in-stent restenosis were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients were included in the study (n = 55 in device-based ADR group, n = 218 in PWT group). Baseline characteristics were similar across groups except for higher prevalence of prior PCI and lower level of lipid profile in the ADR group. Moreover, although patients in the ADR group showed higher contrast volume (441.6 ± 162.4 mL vs. 361.5 ± 142.1 mL, p < 0.001), more intravascular ultrasound guidance (50.9% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001), more guidewires used (4.6 ± 1.4 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and higher troponin T level after PCI (0.167 vs. 0.087, p = 0.004), the technical success, procedural success and in-hospital complications were similar between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 1 year, the ADR group showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven target vessel revascularization) (7.3% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.150) as compared with the PWT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the documented center, the use of device-based ADR for CTO PCI showed no difference in in-hospital complications and mid-term MACE as compared with PWT, despite higher procedure complexity in ADR group.

A Clinical Analysis of the Treatment of Chronic Coronary Artery Occlusion With Antegrade Dissection Reentry

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) technique in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to open chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. Methods: The baseline, angiographic results, PCI success rate, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 12 months of follow-up were compared between 48 patients who did not use ADR in the treatment of CTO lesions (control group) and 50 patients who used ADR (treatment group). Results: The control group comprised 48 patients who had 52 CTO lesions, and the treatment group comprised 50 patients who had 58 CTO lesions. The success rate of PCI in the treatment group (89.7 vs. 71.2%, P = 0.047) was significantly higher than in the control group, where six patients had in-stent restenosis (ISR, ISR-CTO) that were all recanalized. The mean PCI time (71 ± 25 min vs. 95 ± 33 min, P = 0.041), X-ray exposure time (42 ± 17 min vs. 71 ± 22 min, P = 0.032), contrast agent dosage (98 ± 26 ml vs. 178 ± 63 ml, P = 0.029), MACE incidence during the 12 months of follow-up (22.0 vs. 41.7%, P = 0.046) and recurrent myocardial infarction incidence (10.0 vs. 27.1%, P = 0.047) were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group. The differences were all statistically significant. Conclusion: It is safe and effective to use the ADR technique in PCI for coronary artery CTO lesions. The technique shortens the operation time, reduces the radiation dose of doctors and patients and the use dose of contrast agents, and improves patients' prognoses.

Unraveling the mystique of CTO Interventions: Tips and techniques of using hardware to achieve success

The scientific discourse of chronic total occlusions interventions is mired in a technical jargon so confusing that it prevents an average interventional cardiologist from pursuing this field so much so that it has become a domain of a few. This review attempts to simplify this vernacular and present it in a manner that this procedure comes within the scope of a mainstream interventionist.

One-year outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: The impact of dissection re-entry techniques

We aimed to determine clinical outcomes 1 year after successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI and, in particular, whether use of dissection and re-entry strategies affects clinical outcomes. Hybrid approaches have increased the procedural success of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but longer-term outcomes are unknown, particularly in relation to dissection and re-entry techniques. Data were collected for consecutive CTO PCIs performed by hybrid-trained operators from 7 United Kingdom (UK) centres between 2012 and 2014. The primary endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned target vessel revascularization) was measured at 12 months along with angina status. One-year follow up data were available for 96% of successful cases (n = 805). In total, 85% of patients had a CCS angina class of 2-4 prior to CTO PCI. Final successful procedural strategy was antegrade wire escalation 48%; antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) 21%; retrograde wire escalation 5%; retrograde dissection and re-entry (RDR) 26%. Overall, 47% of CTOs were recanalized using dissection and re-entry strategies. During a mean follow up of 11.5 ± 3.8 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.6% (n = 69) of patients (10.3% (n = 39/375) in DART group and 7.0% (n = 30/430) in wire-based cases). The majority of patients (88%) had no or minimal angina (CCS class 0 or 1). ADR and RDR were used more frequently in more complex cases with greater disease burden, however, the only independent predictor of the primary endpoint was lesion length. CTO PCI in complex lesions using the hybrid approach is safe, effective and has a low one-year adverse event rate. The method used to recanalize arteries was not associated with adverse outcomes. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Percutaneous recanalisation of chronically occluded coronary arteries with the CrossBoss/Stingray system: first experience (report of three cases)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) within chronically occluded coronary arteries remain challenging procedures with a lower success rate compared to classic PCI. However, over the last years we have witnessed many technological advances in the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) including new wires, retrograde approach, subintimal tracking and re-entry technique, all underlying which the current success rate of up to 95% in dedicated centres. Subintimal space wire penetration is no longer a problem that would require terminating the procedure. It is now a desired part of hybrid CTO approach involving both antegrade and retrograde crossing and re-entry. The new device which facilitates controlled dissection and true lumen re-entry is the Boston Scientific Coronary CTO Crossing System consisting of a CrossBoss micro-catheter and Stingray balloon and dedicated wire.

METHODS

On October 29th and 30th, 2014, percutaneous coronary recanalisation using the CrossBoss/Stingray system was performed in 3 men aged 63-75, with symptoms of stable CCS class II/III angina, without prior myocardial infarction in the area of CTO artery supply and with preserved myocardial contractility. Each patient underwent at least one previous unsuccesful antegrade/retrograde CTO recanalisation procedure. The J-CTO score was 3-4.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in all 3 patients: 2 right coronary arteries and 1 left anterior descending artery were opened. In all 3 cases, both the CrossBoss catheter and the Stingray re-entry system were used. Two to three drug eluting stents were implanted in each patient, with the total length of 62-106 mm and final TIMI 3 flow. The mean procedure time was 141 min (130-150 min), mean fluoroscopy time was 53 min (48-56 min), absorbed dose was 4772 mGy (4098-5633 mGy), dose area product was 565,208 cGy × cm² (535,109-590,266 cGy × cm²), and the mean contrast volume was 343 mL (320-350 mL). No procedure-related complications were note except for an asymptomatic increase in high-sensitivity troponin T level up to 157 ng/mL (reference range 0-14 ng/mL) in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The Boston Scientific Coronary CTO Crossing System is a useful device for percutaneous recanalisation of chronically occluded coronary arteries. It helps to achieve procedural success in more complex cases within relatively short crossing times and with a limited amount of the contrast agent and X-ray dose.

Language of CTO interventions - Focus on hardware

The knowledge of variety of chronic total occlusion (CTO) hardware and the ability to use them represents the key to success of any CTO interventions. However, the multiplicity of CTO hardware and their physical character and the terminology used by experts create confusion in the mind of an average interventional cardiologist, particularly a beginner in this field. This knowledge is available but is scattered. We aim to classify and compare the currently used devices based on their properties focusing on how physical character of each device can be utilized in a specific situation, thus clarifying and simplifying the technical discourse.

Chronic total occlusions - Current techniques and future directions

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of coronary arteries represent a common and significant challenge to interventional cardiology. Medical therapy is often regarded as an adequate long term strategy in the management of these lesions with surgical intervention for refractory symptoms. Extensive collateralisation is used as a marker of distal coronary perfusion, further reinforcing non-invasive strategies. This together with relatively low percutaneous success rates outside of specialised centres has meant that rates of percutaneous intervention have remained low. Increasing evidence suggests that CTOs are not a benign entity. Further, symptom control and quality of life improve significantly with successful percutaneous revascularisation. Both factors have reignited interest in percutaneous modalities. The Japanese have been pioneers in the field of CTO intervention although their success rates have been difficult to replicate. New techniques and equipment developed in North America offer an alternative to the Japanese approach. These techniques focus on time, radiation and contrast minimisation. This review will assess the histopathology of CTO and shifting paradigms in CTO treatment strategies.

•

Chronic total occlusions are common and prognostically important.

•

Strategies for chronic occlusions are pioneered by Japanese, adapted by North American operators.

•

Japanese and North American strategies appear divergent, both add considerable expertise.