Retrospective Study of a Sustained-Release Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for Treatment of Ocular Inflammation After Cataract and Corneal Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a sustained-release intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.) as an adjunctive therapy in patients undergoing cataract and corneal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective case series contains 18 patients undergoing cataract surgery and 6 patients undergoing corneal surgery. All patients received the Dextenza intracanalicular insert. 6/18 of the patients in the cataract surgery arm were on the standard of care post-surgery topical steroid drop regimen, whereas 11/18 of the patients were on a reduced regimen. 1/18 of the patients was on a drop regimen that deviated from the aforementioned regimens. 2/6 of the patients in the corneal surgery arm were on the standard of care post-surgery topical steroid drop regimen, whereas 3/6 of the patients were on a reduced regimen. 1/6 of the patients were on a drop regimen that deviated from the aforementioned regimens.

RESULTS

The primary outcome measures are intraocular pressure (IOP) levels and anterior chamber inflammation levels across the post-operative recovery period. 1/18 of the patients in the cataract surgery arm and 1/6 of the patients in the corneal surgery arm experienced a clinically significant IOP spike greater than 10 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) above baseline IOP. No patient in either of the study groups had significant inflammation after 1 week post-surgery. 1/18 of the patients in the cataract surgery arm and 1/6 of the patients in the corneal surgery arm experienced a canalicular obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Dextenza with the lower drop protocol showed non-inferiority in terms of inflammation management and safety. As with any steroid delivery mechanism, monitoring IOP is paramount when using Dextenza. One of the patients with a canalicular obstruction had a history of punctal plug implantation, so care should be taken when choosing to implant Dextenza in such a patient.

The DEPOT Study (Dry Eye Prescription Options for Therapy): Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of OTX-DED (Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.3 mg) for Intracanalicular Use Compared with Loteprednol Suspension for the Treatment of Episodic Dry Eye

PURPOSE

To compare OTX-DED, an investigational dexamethasone intracanalicular insert, to loteprednol 0.5% suspension applied QID for 28 days as treatments for acute exacerbations of dry eye disease in terms of patient symptoms, corneal staining, tear breakup time (TBUT), and ocular redness.

METHODS

Fifty patients with an acute exacerbation of dry eye with at least grade 1 corneal staining were randomized to receive treatment and were each evaluated in one eye at baseline, two weeks and four weeks with the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, the Oxford Scale for corneal stain, Schulze Scale for ocular redness, and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients completed the study. Significant improvement was noted from baseline to both week 2 and 4 for each treatment in SPEED scores, corneal staining, and TBUT. Ocular redness improved significantly from baseline to week 2 for loteprednol and week 4 for both drugs. No significant difference was noted between treatments in any of these evaluations at any time point. Retention (visibility) of the OTX-DED insert was 95% at week 2 and 90% at week 4. IOP rose significantly from baseline to both week 2 and 4 for eyes receiving loteprednol but not for those receiving OTX-DED.

CONCLUSION

OTX-DED significantly improved on both signs and symptoms of eyes suffering from acute exacerbations of dry eye disease. This improvement was similar to that seen with loteprednol 0.5% suspension, a well-accepted treatment for this condition. IOP did not change significantly in patients with OTX-DED. These findings support the use of this unique intracanalicular insert for the treatment of acute dry eye once this product is approved and available for use.

Same-Day versus Next-Day Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert Administration for Inflammation and Pain Control Following Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

The dexamethasone 0.4mg intracanalicular insert (Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix, Bedford, MA) is approved for control of postoperative pain and inflammation following ocular surgery. This study compared pain and inflammation resolution following phacoemulsification in eyes that received the insert immediately postoperatively versus the next day.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of existing electronic health records. Consecutive qualifying eyes were included for analysis. All patients received perioperative antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pain and inflammation were assessed at baseline and on postoperative days 1, 7, and 30. Pain was assessed by dichotomous patient report (present/absent). Anterior chamber cell (0, 0.5+, 1–4+) and flare (0–4+) were graded using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature rubric.

Results

Data from 17 eyes of 17 subjects were analyzed; 8 received the insert immediately postoperative and 9 in the office the next day. In both groups, trace cell was present in all eyes at day 1 and had resolved in all but 1 eye in each group at days 7 and 30. Flare was absent in all eyes at every time point, and transient pain was reported in a single same-day eye on day 7. No insert-related adverse events were observed, and no eyes required rescue corticosteroid therapy or insert removal.

Conclusion

Similar rates of inflammation and pain resolution after phacoemulsification were observed with the dexamethasone intracanalicular insert placed either immediately postoperatively or the next day.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/u7wchyuX-MA

A Randomized Fellow-Eye Clinical Trial to Evaluate Patient Preference for Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert or Topical Prednisolone Acetate for Control of Postoperative Symptoms Following Bilateral Femtosecond Laser in Site Keratomileusis (LASIK)

Purpose

To determine the preference of patients undergoing bilateral LASIK for either the dexamethasone intracanalicular insert or topical prednisolone acetate for control of postoperative symptoms and ocular surface signs.

Methods

In this randomized clinical trial, one eye was randomized to receive the dexamethasone insert or topical prednisolone acetate 1% four times daily for one week and 2 times daily for a second week; the fellow eye received the alternate therapy. One month postoperatively, patient preference for these two therapies was assessed using an adapted COMTOL questionnaire. Ocular comfort was assessed using the SPEED questionnaire. Corneal staining and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were also assessed.

Results

Twenty patients participated. At Month 1, 80% of patients preferred the dexamethasone insert, 10% preferred prednisolone acetate, and 10% expressed no preference (p<0.001). SPEED scores measuring ocular comfort/discomfort related to dry eye symptoms were similar between groups (p=0.72), and both the incidence of patient-reported ocular dryness and the corneal staining scores were similar between groups. Both groups attained the same final UDVA.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing elective bilateral femtosecond LASIK surgery overwhelmingly (by an 8-to-1 margin) preferred the dexamethasone insert to topical prednisolone acetate for postoperative treatment. The insert produced comparable ocular comfort, corneal staining, and visual acuity outcomes to topical prednisolone. The insert is an appropriate means of postoperative symptom control in this quality of life-conscious population.

Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trial of a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert in a Chronic Allergen Challenge Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a sustained-release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) in a model of allergic conjunctivitis.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, Phase 2 study. Subjects had to have a positive conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) reaction to allergen (bilateral +2 itching and redness on 5-point, 0-4 scales) at Visit 1, and for 2 of 3 time points on subsequent visits. Subjects who met entry criteria were randomized to receive Dextenza or PV (vehicle insert). Challenges occurred over 42 days, with efficacy assessed at 14 (primary endpoint visit), 28, and 40 days postinsertion. Outcome measures included the evaluation of ocular itching, redness, tearing, chemosis, eyelid swelling, rhinorrhea, and congestion.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight subjects completed the study in the Dextenza group and 31 in the vehicle group. At 14 days postinsertion, Dextenza was statistically superior to PV, with least square mean differences for ocular itching of -0.76, -0.97, and -0.87 at 3, 5, and 7 min post-CAC, and for conjunctival redness of -0.46, -0.66, and -0.68 at 7, 15, and 20 min post-CAC. Clinical significance, defined as a 1-U decrease from PV, was not met for primary efficacy. Secondary endpoints, including number of subjects reporting itching and conjunctival redness, indicated superior performance of Dextenza compared with vehicle. Eleven Dextenza-treated (35.5%) and 10 vehicle-treated (30.3%) subjects each experienced a single adverse event.

CONCLUSION

This Phase 2 study demonstrated preliminary efficacy and safety data of Dextenza for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

Evaluating the patient experience after implantation of a 0.4 mg sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™): results of a qualitative survey

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient experience of sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) following cataract surgery as part of a Phase III clinical trial program.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, qualitative evaluation involved individual interviews lasting approximately 45 minutes. Patients from four US investigational study sites who had previously received an insert were enrolled. There were no predesignated end points; this was a qualitative survey seeking a deeper understanding of patient experience.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were interviewed. Most patients (92%) reported the highest level of satisfaction grade with regard to overall product satisfaction. All patients described the insert as comfortable. Most patients (96%) described their overall experience with the insert as very convenient or extremely convenient. Twenty-two of 23 (96%) participants rated their experience with the insert as "very" or "extremely convenient", compared to previous topical therapy, and 88% of patients stated that if they were to undergo cataract surgery again, they would request the insert. When asked if they would recommend the insert to family members or friends, 92% stated they would. The survey found that 84% of participants would be willing to pay more for the insert than for eye drop therapy.

CONCLUSION

The dexamethasone insert was found by patients to be highly favorable with regard to overall satisfaction, convenience, and comfort. The insert was well received and largely preferred over topical therapy alternatives following surgery. More extensive evaluation of the patient experience is warranted, and future studies should help inform design of the next generation of sustained release drug delivery systems.