1
|
Ma X, Wang X, Xu L, Shi H, Yang H, Landrock KK, Sharma VK, Chapkin RS. Fate and distribution of orally-ingested CeO 2-nanoparticles based on a mouse model: Implication for human health. Soil Environ Health 2023; 1:100017. [PMID: 37830053 PMCID: PMC10568217 DOI: 10.1016/j.seh.2023.100017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
The use of nanoparticles in agrichemical formula and food products as additives has increased their chances of accumulation in humans via oral intake. Due to their potential toxicity, it is critical to understand their fate and distribution following oral intake. Cerium oxide nanoparticle (CeO2NP) is commonly used in agriculture and is highly stable in the environment. As such, it has been used as a model chemical to investigate nanoparticle's distribution and clearance. Based on their estimated human exposure levels, 0.15-0.75 mg/kg body weight/day of CeO2NPs with different sizes and surface charges (30-50 nm with negative charge and <25 nm with positive charge) were gavaged into C57BL/6 female mice daily. After 10-d, 50% of mice in each treatment were terminated, with the remaining being gavaged with 0.2 mL of deionized water daily for 7-d. Mouse organ tissues, blood, feces, and urine were collected at termination. At the tested levels, CeO2NPs displayed minimal overt toxicity to the mice, with their accumulation in various organs being negligible. Fecal discharge as the predominant clearance pathway took less than 7-d regardless of charges. Single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated minimal aggregation of CeO2NPs in the gastrointestinal tract. These findings suggest that nanoparticle additives >25 nm are unlikely to accumulate in mouse organ after oral intake, indicating limited impacts on human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingmao Ma
- Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Xiaoxuan Wang
- Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Lei Xu
- Linda and Bipin Doshi Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, USA
| | - Honglan Shi
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Research in Energy and Environment, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
| | - Hu Yang
- Linda and Bipin Doshi Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, USA
| | - Kerstin K. Landrock
- Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Program in Integrative Nutrition & Complex Diseases, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Virender K. Sharma
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Robert S. Chapkin
- Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
- Program in Integrative Nutrition & Complex Diseases, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen Y, Guo J, Chen G, Chin CT, Chen X, Chen J, Wang F, Chen S, Dan G. Delivery of Liposomes with Different Sizes to Mice Brain after Sonication by Focused Ultrasound in the Presence of Microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42:1499-511. [PMID: 27126236 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Imaging or therapeutic agents larger than the blood-brain barrier's (BBB) exclusion threshold of 400 Da could be delivered locally, non-invasively and reversibly by focused ultrasound (FUS) with circulating microbubbles. The size of agents is an important factor to the delivery outcome using this method. Liposomes are important drug carriers with controllable sizes in a range of nanometers. However, discrepancies among deliveries of intact liposomes with different sizes, especially those larger than 50 nm, across the BBB opened by FUS with microbubbles remain unexplored. In the present study, rhodamine-labeled long-circulating pegylated liposomes with diameters of 55 nm, 120 nm and 200 nm were delivered to mice brains after BBB disruption by pulsed FUS with microbubbles. Four groups of peak rarefactional pressure and microbubble dosages were used: 0.53 MPa with 0.1 μL/g (group 1), 0.53 MPa with 0.5 μL/g (group 2), 0.64 MPa with 0.1 μL/g (group 3) and 0.64 MPa with 0.5 μL/g (group 4). The delivery outcome was observed using fluorescence imaging of brain sections. It was found that the delivery of 55-nm liposomes showed higher success rates than 120-nm or 200-nm liposomes from groups 1-3. The result indicated that it may be more difficult to deliver larger liposomes (>120 nm) passively than 55-nm liposomes after BBB opening by FUS with microbubbles. The relative fluorescence area of 55-nm liposomes to the total area of the sonicated region was statistically larger than that of the 120-nm or 200-nm liposomes. Increasing peak rarefactional pressure amplitude or microbubble dose could induce more accumulation of liposomes in the brain using FUS with microbubbles. Moreover, the distribution pattern of delivered liposomes was heterogeneous and characterized by separated fluorescence spots with cloud-like periphery surrounding a bright center, indicating confined diffusion in the extracellular matrix after extravasation from the microvasculature. These findings are expected to provide useful information for developing FUS with microbubbles as an effective trans-BBB liposomal drug delivery strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Shen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Jinxuan Guo
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Gaoshu Chen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Chien Ting Chin
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Xin Chen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Jian Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, P. R. China
| | - Shiguo Chen
- Nanshan District Key Lab for Biopolymers and Safety Evaluation, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China
| | - Guo Dan
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|