Disability competency training in medical education

PURPOSE

Lack of health care providers' knowledge about the experience and needs of individuals with disabilities contribute to health care disparities experienced by people with disabilities. Using the Core Competencies on Disability for Health Care Education, this mixed methods study aimed to explore the extent the Core Competencies are addressed in medical education programs and the facilitators and barriers to expanding curricular integration.

METHOD

Mixed-methods design with an online survey and individual qualitative interviews was used. An online survey was distributed to U.S. medical schools. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted via Zoom with five key informants. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen medical schools responded to the survey. Many schools reported addressing most of the Core Competencies. The extent of disability competency training varied across medical programs with the majority showing limited opportunities for in depth understanding of disability. Most schools had some, although limited, engagement with people with disabilities. Having faculty champions was the most frequent facilitator and lack of time in the curriculum was the most significant barrier to integrating more learning activities. Qualitative interviews provided more insight on the influence of the curricular structure and time and the importance of faculty champion and resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the need for better integration of disability competency training woven throughout medical school curriculum to encourage in-depth understanding about disability. Formal inclusion of the Core Competencies into the Liaison Committee on Medical Education standards can help ensure that disability competency training does not rely on champions or resources.

Developing Disability-Focused Pre-Health and Health Professions Curricula

People with disabilities (PWD) comprise a significant part of the population yet experience some of the most profound health disparities. Among the greatest barriers to quality care are inadequate health professions education related to caring for PWD. Drawing upon the expertise of health professions educators in medicine, public health, nursing, social work, and physician assistant programs, this forum showcases innovative methods for teaching core disability skills and concepts grounded in disability studies and the health humanities. Each of the essays offers practical guidance for developing curricular interventions appropriate for students at various levels of training and familiarity with disability to be implemented in classroom discussions, case-based learning, lectures, panels, and clinical simulations across the full spectrum of pre-health and health professions education.

Delivering disability competencies of MCI's revised competency based curriculum at a medical university in North Karnataka

Background

India has ratified with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and has passed the Rights of People with Disabilities Act in 2016. There is need for training healthcare professionals in disability competencies as people with disabilities are many and marginalized. Disability competencies were introduced in the foundation course of revised competency based medical curriculum for Indian medical graduates by the Medical Council of India (MCI) just prior to the rollout of the programme. We intend describing our center's experience in implementing the same.

Methods

FC 4.5.1 TO 4.5.8 of MCI foundation course guidelines were resource material. Eight faculty members participated. Setting was the lecture theatre. The suggested and actual teaching learning methods are compared for each competency. Notes made from delivering disability competencies, photographs, videos and reflections from students were source of data.

Results

We used sensitizing lectures of 15 min each for FC 4.5.1, 4.5.2 and 4.5.4 [cognitive] with interesting set induction, student narratives of family members with disability, buzz groups for interaction and self-directed learning activity using mobile phones. We facilitated FC 4.5.3 and 4.5.5 [skill/affective domain] demonstrating unacceptable and acceptable disability etiquettes using standardized patients and role play. We conducted a forum theatre of the oppressed for FC 4.5.6. We introduced our learners to universal design in our campus for teaching 4.5.7. As a part of the principle of inclusivity we involved two staff members with motor disabilities for delivering FC 4.5.8 in an interview. We assessed the learners using written reflections and obtained feedback on a rating scale.