1
|
Wang GY, Zhu QZ, Zhu HL, Jiang LJ, Zhao N, Liu ZK, Zhang FQ. Clinical performance evaluation of O-Ring Halcyon Linac: A real-world study. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7728-7737. [PMID: 36158510 PMCID: PMC9372831 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy, especially the development of linear accelerators, plays a key role in cancer management. The fast-rotating coplanar O-ring Halcyon Linac has demonstrated many advantages. The previous literature has mainly focused on the machine parameters and plan quality of Halcyon, with a lack of relevant research on its clinical application.
AIM To evaluate the clinical performance of the O-ring Halcyon treatment system in a real-world application setting.
METHODS Data from sixty-one patients who were treated with the Halcyon system throughout the entire radiotherapy process in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between August 2019 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the target tumour response to radiotherapy and irradiation toxicity from 1 to 3 mo after treatment. Dosimetric verification of Halcyon plans was performed using a quality assurance procedure, including portal dosimetry, ArcCHECK and point dose measurements for verification of the system delivery accuracy.
RESULTS Of the 61 patients in the five groups, 16, 12, 7 and 26 patients had complete response, partial response, progressive disease and stable disease, respectively. No increase in the irradiated target tumour volume was observed when separately evaluating the local response. Regarding irradiation toxicity, no radiation-induced deaths were observed. Thirty-eight percent (23/61 patients) had no radiation toxicity after radiotherapy, 56% (34/61 patients) experienced radiation toxicity that resolved after treatment, and 6% (4/61 patients) had irreversible adverse reactions. The average gamma passing rates with a 2% dose difference and 2-mm distance to agreement for IMRT/VMAT/SRT plans were ArcCHECK at 96.4% and portal dosimetry at 96.7%, respectively. All of the validated clinical plans were within 3% for point dose measurements, and Halcyon’s ArcCHECK demonstrated a high pass rate of 99.1% ± 1.1% for clinical gamma passing criteria of 3%/3 mm.
CONCLUSION The O-ring Halcyon Linac could achieve a better therapeutic effect on the target volume by providing accurate treatment delivery plans with tolerable irradiation toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang-Yu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qi-Zhen Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - He-Ling Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ling-Juan Jiang
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Nan Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhi-Kai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Fu-Quan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nishio T, Tachibana H, Kase Y, Hotta K, Nakamura M, Tamura M, Terunuma T, Toshito T, Yamashita H, Ishikura S, Fuji H, Akimoto T, Nishimura Y. Liver phantom design and dosimetric verification in participating institutions for a proton beam therapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1315C). Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:98-104. [PMID: 31265942 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In Japan, the first domestic clinical trial of proton beam therapy for the liver was initiated as the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1315C: Non-randomized controlled study comparing proton beam therapy and hepatectomy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma). Purposes of this study were to develop a new dosimetric verification system and to carry out a credentialing for the JCOG1315C clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Accuracy and differences in doses in proton treatment planning among participating institutions were surveyed and investigated. We designed and developed a suitable water tank-type liver phantom for a dosimetric verification of proton beam therapy for liver. In a visiting survey of five institutions participating in the clinical trial, we performed the dosimetric verification using the liver phantom and an air-filled ionization chamber. RESULTS The shape of the dose distributions calculated in proton treatment planning was characteristic and dependent on the manufacturers of the proton beam therapy system, the proton treatment planning system and the setup at the participating institutions. Widths of the lateral penumbra were 5.8-12.7 mm among participating institutions. The accuracy between the calculated and the measured doses in the proton irradiation was within 3% at five measurement points including both points on the isocenter and off the isocenter. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirmed the accuracy of the delivery doses in the institutions participating in the clinical trial, and the clinical trial with integration of all institutions (five institutions) could be initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teiji Nishio
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan.
| | - Hidenobu Tachibana
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yuki Kase
- Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Japan
| | - Kenji Hotta
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan
| | - Masaya Tamura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Department of Proton Therapy Physics, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Japan
| | - Haruo Yamashita
- Proton Therapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ishikura
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hatanaka S, Shimbo M, Hariu M, Nakajima G, Todoroki K, Hosaka K, Watanabe T, Washizu K, Utsumi N, Yamano T, Nishimura K, Takahashi T. Simple index for validity of the evaluation point for dosimetric verification results of intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a Farmer-type ionization chamber. J Xray Sci Technol 2018; 26:473-480. [PMID: 29562582 DOI: 10.3233/xst-17339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Based on a retrospective analysis, this study aims to develop a simple index for validity of the evaluation point for the dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS The results for the dosimetric verifications of a total of 69 IMRT plans were analyzed in this study. A Farmer-type ion chamber was used as a dose detector, and a solid water-equivalent phantom was used. Index values were obtained by dividing the difference between the maximum and minimum dosages by the mean dosage of the 69 plans, and the values were classified into five groups with index value <4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, and >16. A t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of the mean differences of the absolute values of the relative errors among these groups. RESULTS We found that there was no significant difference between the groups with index value <4 and 4-8 (p = 0.152); however, there were significant differences between the other groups (p < 0.01). In addition, when the index values were smaller than 8, the pass ratio of 3% tolerance was 96.2% and the pass ratio of 5% tolerance was 99.9%. We observed that the smaller the index value, the smaller the uncertainty of the dose measurement. CONCLUSIONS The results obtained in this study may prove to be useful for accurate dosimetric verifications of IMRTs when ion chambers are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogo Hatanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Munefumi Shimbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Hariu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Go Nakajima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Todoroki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Katsuhito Hosaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kana Washizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobuko Utsumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
- Department of Radiology, JCHO Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tsukudocho, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yamano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takeo Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|