Evaluation of a new immunoassay for chromogranin A measurement on the Kryptor system

Background

Chromogranin A (CgA) is a biomarker for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aims of this study were to evaluate differences in measurement between the ThermoFisher Brahms CgA Kryptor assay and the CisBio assay and to investigate the influence of patient covariates. Temperature stability of CgA using both assays was determined.

Design and Methods

406 patients were analyzed for serum CgA using both assays. We performed a comparison study to determine whether several patient covariates (gender, use of protein pump inhibitors, impaired kidney function, referral department and tumor location) influenced the results. For the stability study, pooled serum samples were aliquoted and stored at different storage temperatures (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C) until assayed. In addition, 15 individual samples were evaluated after storage at 4 °C using the Kryptor assay.

Results

Differences in measured concentrations between the assays were statistically significant. Passing & Bablok fit showed ln Y(Kryptor)=1.05 ln X(CisBio) – 0.20 with a bias of 1.0% after logarithmic transformation. Patient covariates were not associated. Patients׳ sera showed variable stability for CgA in the Kryptor assay at room temperature and 4 °C, whereas the recovery in the CisBio assay was stable at both temperatures.

Conclusion

Differences in measured CgA concentration between the assays could not be explained by the investigated patient covariates. Serum should be stored at –20 °C prior to determination using the Kryptor assay.

•

A Kryptor assay measured significant higher levels of CgA compared with CisBio.

•

Difference between Kryptor and CisBio not explained by patient covariates in this study.

•

Storage at room temperature and 4 °C should be avoided when using the Kryptor assay.

Use of immuno assays during the development of a Hemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for technology transfer to emerging vaccine manufacturers

Quality control of Hemophilus Influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines is mainly dependent on physicochemical methods. Overcoming sample matrix interference when using physicochemical tests is very challenging, these tests are therefore only used to test purified samples of polysaccharide, protein, bulk conjugate, and final product. For successful development of a Hib conjugate vaccine, several ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) methods were needed as an additional tool to enable testing of in process (IP) samples. In this paper, three of the ELISA's that have been very valuable during the process development, implementation and scaling up are highlighted. The PRP-ELISA, was a very efficient tool in testing in process (IP) samples generated during the development of the cultivation and purification process of the Hib-polysaccharide. The antigenicity ELISA, was used to confirm the covalent linkage of PRP and TTd in the conjugate. The anti-PRP IgG ELISA was developed as part of the immunogenicity test, used to demonstrate the ability of the Hib conjugate vaccine to elicit a T-cell dependent immune response in mice. ELISA methods are relatively cheap and easy to implement and therefore very useful during the development of polysaccharide conjugate vaccines.