Source or sink? A study on the methane flux from mangroves stems in Zhangjiang estuary, southeast coast of China

Mangrove ecosystems are an important component of "blue carbon". However, it is not clear whether the stems play roles in the CH₄ budget of mangrove ecosystems. This study investigated the CH₄ emission from mangrove stems and its potential driving factors. We set up six sample plots in the Zhangjiang Estuary National Mangrove Nature Reserve, where Kandelia obovata, Avicennia marina and Aegiceras corniculata are the main mangrove tree species. Soil properties such as total carbon content, redox potential and salinity were determined in each plot. The dynamic chamber method was used to measure mangrove stems and soil CH₄ fluxes. Combined field survey results with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of soil properties, we divided the six plots into two sites (S1 and S2) to perform statistical analyses of stem CH₄ fluxes. Then the CH₄ fluxes from mangrove tree stems and soil were further scaled up to the ecosystem level through the mapping model. Under different backgrounds of soil properties, salinity and microbial biomass carbon were the main factors modified soil CH₄ fluxes in the two sites, and further affected the stem CH₄ fluxes of mangroves. The soil of both sites are sources of CH₄, and the soil CH₄ emission of S2 was about twice higher than that of S1. Results of upscaling model showed that mangrove stems in S1 were CH₄ sinks with -105.65 g d^-1. But stems in S2 were CH₄ sources around 1448.24 g d^-1. Taken together, our results suggested that CH₄ emission from mangrove soils closely depends on soils properties. And mangrove stems were found to act as both CH₄ sources and CH₄ sinks depend on soil CH₄ production. Therefore, when calculating the CH₄ budget of the mangrove ecosystem, the contribution of mangrove plant stems cannot be ignored.

H2O2 metabolism in liver and heart mitochondria: Low emitting-high scavenging and high emitting-low scavenging systems

Although mitochondria are presumed to emit and consume reactive oxygen species (ROS), the quantitative interplay between the two processes in ROS regulation is not well understood. Here, we probed the role of mitochondrial bioenergetics in H₂O₂ metabolism using rainbow trout liver and heart mitochondria. Both liver and heart mitochondria emitted H₂O₂ at rates that depended on their metabolic state, with the emission rates (free radical leak) constituting 0.8-2.9% and 0.2-2.5% of the respiration rate in liver and heart mitochondria, respectively. When presented with exogenous H₂O₂, liver and heart mitochondria consumed it by first order reactions with half-lives (s) of 117 and 210, and rate constants of 5.96 and 3.37 (× 10^-3 s^-1), respectively. The mitochondrial bioenergetic status greatly affected the rate of H₂O₂ consumption in heart but not liver mitochondria. Moreover, the activities and contribution of H₂O₂ scavenging systems varied between liver and heart mitochondria. The significance of the scavenging systems ranked by the magnitude (%) of inhibition of H₂O₂ removal after correcting for emission were, liver (un-energized and energized): catalase > glutathione (GSH) ≥ thioredoxin reductase (TrxR); un-energized heart mitochondria: catalase > TrxR > GSH and energized heart mitochondria: GSH > TrxR > catalase. Notably, depletion of GSH evoked a massive surge in H₂O₂ emission that grossly masked the contribution of this pathway to H₂O₂ scavenging in heart mitochondria. Irrespective of the organ of their origin, mitochondria behaved as H₂O₂ regulators that emitted or consumed it depending on the ambient H₂O₂ concentration, mitochondrial bioenergetic state and activity of the scavenging enzyme systems. Indeed, manipulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics and H₂O₂ scavenging systems caused mitochondria to switch from being net consumers to net emitters of H₂O₂. Overall, our data suggest that the low levels of H₂O₂ typically present in cells would favor emission of this metabolite but the scavenging systems would prevent its accumulation.