What is the best method of rectovaginal fistula repair? A 25-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) remains challenging and there is a lack of data to demonstrate the best, single procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the results of different surgical operations for rectovaginal fistula.

METHODS

Patients with RVF who underwent surgical repair between 1992 and 2017 at a single, tertiary care center were included. Twenty different procedures were performed including: primary closure, closure with sphincter repair, flap repairs, plug/fibrin/mesh repair, examination under anesthesia (EUA) ± seton placement, abdominal resections with and without diversion and ileostomy takedown, gracilis muscle transposition, fistulotomy/ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. All patients with RVF due to diverticulitis and patients without complete data from paper charting were excluded. Success was defined based on the absence of symptoms related to RVF and absence of diverting stoma at 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four women were analyzed. The median age was 45 (range 18-84) years. Median follow-up time from the last procedure was 6 months (range 0-203 months). The total number of patients considered successfully treated at the end of their treatment was 91 (91/124, 73.4%). When considering all procedures (n = 255), the success rate for flap procedures was 57.9% (22/38), followed by abdominal resections with and without proximal diversion and ileostomy takedown (16/29, 55.2%) and primary closure with sphincter repair (17/32, 53.1%) while fistula plug, and fibrin glue had among the lowest success rates (4/22, 18.2%). The highest success rate was observed among patients whose RVF etiology was due to malignancy (11/16, 68.8%) followed by unknown (8/14, 57%) and iatrogenic (21/48, 43.8%) causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Local procedures such as mucosal flap or primary closure and sphincteroplasty are associated with a high success rate should be considered in patients with low-lying, simple RVF. Abdominal resections with and without proximal diversions and ileostomy takedown have a relatively high success rate in selected patients. The low success rate of fibrin glue and fistula plugs demonstrates their low efficacy in RVF; thus, these procedures should be avoided in the treatment algorithm.

Autologous adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistula: a prospective case-control study

Background

Complex cryptoglandular perianal fistula (CPAF) is a kind of anal fistula that may cause anal incontinence after surgery. Minimally invasive surgery of anal fistula is constantly emerging. Over the past 20 years, there are several sphincter-sparing surgeries, one of which is autologous adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) transplantation. However, to date, there is no study regarding the treatment of complex CPAF with ADSC in China. This is the first study in China on the treatment of complex CPAF with ADSC to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Methods

Totally, 24 patients with complex CPAF were enrolled in this prospective case-control study from January 2018 to December 2019 in the National Colorectal Disease Center of Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Patients were divided into ADSC group and endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) group according to their desire. The healing of fistulas (healing of all treated fistulas at baseline, confirmed by doctor’s clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasonography) was evaluated at week 12 after treatment. In addition to their safety evaluation based on adverse events monitored at each follow-up, the patients were also asked to complete some scoring scales at each follow-up including pain score with visual analog score (VAS) and anal incontinence score with Wexner score.

Results

The closure rates within ADSC group and ERAF group at week 12 were 54.55% (6/11) and 53.85% (7/13), respectively, without significant difference between them. VAS score in ADSC group was significantly lower than that in ERAF group at the 5th day postoperatively [1(0,2) VS 2(2,4), p = 0.011], but no differences were observed at the other time. Wexner score of all patients was not increased with no significant differences between the two groups. Adverse events were observed fewer in ADSC group (27.27%) than that in ERAF group (53.85%), but there was no significant difference between them.

Conclusion

This study indicated safety and efficiency of ADSC for the treatment of complex CPAF in the short term, which is not inferior to that of ERAF. ADSC may provide a promised and potential treatment for complex CPAF conforming to the future of the treatment, which is reconstruction and regeneration.

Trail registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800014599. Registered 23 January 2018—retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=24548

Endorectal Advancement Flap With Muscular Plication in Anovaginal and Anterior Perineal Fistulas

Purpose

Endorectal mucosal advancement flap with muscular plication can ensure complete closure of anovaginal fistulas and preserve continence. The aim of this retrospective study was to show indications might be broadened to include anoperineal fistulas.

Methods

This retrospective study gathered all available data from patients with anovaginal or anterior perineal fistulas who underwent transanal advancement flap repair with muscular plication. A loose seton was passed in the fistula track prior to surgery in all patients. Fistula healing was defined as fistula closure during proctological examination associated with complete resolution of symptoms.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included from January 2011 to March 2017. Causes of fistula were various, mostly post-operative (34.3%, n = 12), obstetrical (17.1%, n = 6) and inflammatory (14.3%, n = 5). Success rate was 65.2%. Fistula healing was obtained in 60.0% of patients with Crohn disease in remission. Closure rate was higher in anterior perineal fistulas (89.0%) than in anovaginal fistulas (63.6%) even if it did not reach statistical significance. Slight fecal continence disorders were noted in 2 women (5.7%).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the efficacy of transanal advancement flap repair with muscular plication for anovaginal and anterior perineal fistulas. Similar closure rates and smaller postoperative incontinence rates compared to the classical technique make this surgery an optimal solution whose efficacy appears to be sustainable over time.

Endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistula: does flap configuration matter?

AIM

Treatment of complex anal fistula (CAF) is challenging, often requiring multiple operations due to a high failure rate. The plethora of options attests to the lack of a panacea. Endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) carries the advantages of no sphincter division, no contour defect to the anal canal and no perineal wound. The failure rate of this procedure ranges between 15% and 60%. Although the procedure traditionally described a rhomboid (tongue-shaped) flap, an elliptical (curvilinear) flap was introduced to try to improve the results. This study aimed to describe the elliptical-shaped ERAF performed by the senior authors and others and compare failure rates between elliptical and rhomboid ERAFs for CAF.

METHOD

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ERAF for CAF between 2011 and 2017 was undertaken. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of flap: rhomboid or elliptical. The main outcomes measures were postoperative persistent or recurrent fistula.

RESULTS

Seventy-six ERAF procedures for CAF were identified in 71 patients; 39 had a classic rhomboid flap and 37 had an elliptical configuration with mean follow-up of 13.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. The groups were similar for demographic parameters and preoperative fistula characteristics. The overall failure rate was 37%, with a success rate of 64% in the rhomboid and 62% in the elliptical group.

CONCLUSION

The shape of the ERAF for treatment of CAF does not appear to influence failure rate.

Early outcomes of fluorescence angiography in the setting of endorectal mucosa advancement flaps

BACKGROUND

Fistula-in-ano has a reported incidence of 31-34%. Besides fistulotomy, options for fistula repair are seton placement, endorectal advancement flap (ERAF), fibrin sealant, anal fistula plug and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract. Despite having a reported success rate as high as 75-98%, ERAF is not without complications, including flap breakdown, recurrence and fecal incontinence. Traditionally, maintaining a broad base to preserve blood supply has been advocated to reduce flap failure. And the aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of adult patients who underwent ERAF for complex fistula-in-ano with the use of intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) at our institution between July 2014 and July 2016.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of complex fistula-in-ano repair with ERAF and FA from a prospectively maintained dataset of adult patients with complex fistula-in-ano. Demographics, intraoperative data and 60-day outcomes were recorded and reviewed.

RESULTS

Six patients [five males and one female with a mean age of 40 years (range 25-46 years)], with a total of seven fistulas, were identified. Six (85.7%) of these patients had undergone prior surgery for fistula-in-ano. No recurrences or complications of any type were noted at 2-week and 8-week follow-up. The majority of patients (71.4%) required flap revision based on intraoperative FA prior to flap fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

FA is safe and offers real-time assessment of flap perfusion prior to and after fixation in anal fistula repair. The rate of flap ischemia may be underestimated, and therefore, to improve outcomes in ERAF, intraoperative FA should be included in the surgical armamentarium.

Successful management of rectovaginal fistula treated by endorectal advancement flap: report of two cases and literature review

Introduction

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) sometimes has a difficulty in treatment. This report describes two patients who suffered from RVF.

Case descriptions

One patient was a 76-year-old woman who had a RVF over 30 years after the 3rd childbirth. She underwent endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). She had a nighttime soiling after ERAF once a month, which disappeared one year after surgery. Second patient was a 23-year-old woman who had a RVF one month after the first childbirth. She underwent ERAF, and did not have any complications.

Discussion and evaluation

Both patients did not develop recurrence for four years. Quality of life after ERAF was satisfactory in both patients. ERAF is a safe procedure in terms of both short and long outcomes. We also present a review of the literature concerning ERAF for RVF.

Conclusions

ERAF can be a potential option as a treatment for RVF.

Anal abscess and fistula

Benign anorectal diseases, such as anal abscesses and fistula, are commonly seen by primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, emergency physicians, general surgeons, and colorectal surgeons. It is important to have a thorough understanding of the complexity of these 2 disease processes so as to provide appropriate and timely treatment. We review the pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options for both anal abscesses and fistulas.