Comparison between two minimally invasive techniques for Hirschsprung disease: transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) versus laparoscopic-TERPT

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment for Hirschsprung disease (HD) has recently evolved into different minimally invasive techniques. The aim of the present study is to compare results from two different minimal invasive approaches, transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) and laparoscopic-assisted endorectal pull-through (LA-TERPT).

METHODS

Patients have been divided into two groups according to surgical technique. Data of HD patients treated by TERPT and those treated by LA-TERPT, respectively, performed at two different centers from January 2007 to December 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with aganglionosis confined to the recto-sigmoid colon with a minimum follow-up period of 4 years have been included. Demographic, clinical, surgical and functional outcome data were reviewed for each group using Chi-square and Fisher tests (statistical differences were considered for p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Among patients treated for HD in the two centers during the study period, 65 met the inclusion criteria (37 TERPT group and 28 LA-TERPT group). No differences regarding demographic and clinical data were observed between the two groups. Operative time was longer in the LA-TERPT group (p < 0.001). Time to start oral feeding was faster in the TERPT group while hospital stay was similar between the two groups. Three patients of the TERPT group required an additional abdominal approach. The rate of early complications was higher in the TERPT group. Long-term bowel function was assessed in 31 patients for the TERPT group and 24 patients for the LA-TERPT group. Outcomes showed that the bowel functional outcome was good (BFS ≥ 17) in 55% (n = 17) of TERPT group and 54% of LA-TERPT group (p = 0.97), moderate (BFS 12 to 16) in 16% (n = 5) and 33% (n = 8), respectively (p = 0.24), and poor in 29% (n = 9) and 13% (n = 3), respectively (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TERPT and LA-TERPT techniques should be considered safe and feasible for the treatment of HD patients. TERPT patients present faster time to return to normal bowel function while LA-TERPT patients have slightly lower incidence of postoperative complications. Long-term functional outcomes are similar between the two groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Sexual function and lower urinary tract symptoms after minimally invasive endorectal pull-through in adolescent males with Hirschsprung disease

BACKGROUND

Effects of colorectal resection on sexual function and the lower urinary tract are inadequately studied in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD). This study aimed to increase existing knowledge on sexual function and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in HD male adolescents operated with minimally invasive endorectal pull-through (ERPT).

METHODS

Non-syndromic male adolescents (12-18 years) operated with ERPT were invited to participate in this single-center cross-sectional study which included a semi-structured interview on sexual function and LUTS, a questionnaire recording LUTS, and a urodynamic study. Uroflowmetry curves were eligible for evaluation if the voided volume was >50% of expected bladder capacity. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

RESULTS

Of 37 eligible male adolescents, 35 (95%) with a median age of 14.9 (12.0 -18.3) years were included. 94% had rectosigmoid aganglionosis, and 97% underwent a minimally invasive ERPT. 34 (97%) visited the outpatient clinic. The ability to get erections and to ejaculate was assessed in 25/35 (71%) adolescents. 25/25 (100%) could get an erection, and of adolescents ≥15 years 14/15 (93%) could ejaculate. 32 (91%) returned the questionnaire and underwent urodynamic studies. 15/32 (47%) reported LUTS, but most had only sporadic LUTS. 31/32 (97%) were highly satisfied with their bladder function. Sporadic urinary incontinence was reported by 4/32 (13%), but none reported social problems due to this. Of the eligible 28/32 (88%) uroflowmetry curves, 15/28 (54%) were normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive ERPT seems to preserve sexual function and does not induce lower urinary tract symptoms in adolescent HD males.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Transanal endorectal or transabdominal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease; which is better? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Hesitations concerning the long-term results of transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) due to prolonged anal stretching and resultant stricture and continence problems has been started to be questioned. This meta-analysis intended to compare long-term results between TEPT and transabdominal (TAB) pull-through techniques in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease.

METHODS

All publications between the years 1998-2021 in the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases were reviewed. Retrospective and prospective comparative studies for TEPT, TAB as well as Laparoscopic-assisted TEPT (LTEPT) were included. Data included age at operation, postoperative constipation, enterocolitis, incontinence, stricture, and soiling rates.

RESULTS

Eighteen publications met the inclusion criteria for TAB and TEPT, and six for TEPT and LTEPT. Patients who underwent TEPT had significantly younger operation age than patients with TAB (SMD - 1.02, 95%Cl - 1.85 to - 0.18, p: 0.0168). Postoperative constipation (OR 0.39, 95% Cl 0.25-0.61 p < 0.0001) and enterocolitis (OR 0.65, 95% Cl 0.46-0.90, p: 0.0108) rates were significantly lower in TEPT groups. Postoperative incontinence (OR 1.06, 95% Cl 0.56-2.01, p: 0.8468), stricture (OR 1.97, 95% Cl 0.81-4.80, p: 0.1352) and soiling rates were similar between the two groups. Furthermore, when TEPT and LTEPT results were compared, incidence of incontinence (OR 7.01, 95% Cl 0.75-65.33, p: 0.0871), constipation (OR 1.95, 95% Cl 0.70-5.37, p: 0.199), enterocolitis (OR 3.16, 95% Cl 0.34-29.55 p: 0.3137), stricture (OR 1.33, 95% Cl 0.29-6.15, p: 0.7188) and soiling (OR 1.57, 95% Cl 0.57-4.31, p: 0.3778) were similar for both techniques.

DISCUSSION

TEPT is superior to TAB in terms of constipation and enterocolitis. Contrary to concerns, postoperative incontinence rates are not statistically different. However, further publications about long-term LTEPT results are necessary for more reliable conclusions.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after total transanal and laparoscopic assisted endorectal pull-through in patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease

BACKGROUND

Total transanal (TERPT) and laparoscopic endorectal pull-through (LERPT) are the most common procedures to treat rectosigmoid Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Since few studies have compared the two methods, we aimed to assess clinical outcomes after TERPT and LERPT in this cross-sectional study.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

All patients with rectosigmoid HD operated with TERPT and LERPT between 2001 and 2018 were eligible. Peri-operative data were registered from patients' records, and bowel function was assessed according to the Krickenbeck classification.

RESULTS

91/97 (94%) patients were included; 46 operated with TERPT and 45 with LERPT. Bowel function was assessed in 80 patients at median seven (4-17) years. There was no difference in functional outcome between the procedures. Unplanned procedures under general anesthesia were frequent; 28% after TERPT and 49% after LERPT (p = 0.04). 11% of TERPT and 29% of LERPT patients got botulinum toxin injections (p = 0.03). In the TERPT group, patients operated in the neonatal period had poorer outcome (78%) than those operated later (24%) (p = 0.005). No difference in operative time, length of hospital stay, and rate of early and late complications was found between the procedures.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in long-term bowel function in patients with rectosigmoid HD operated with TERPT or LERPT. More LERPT patients had an unplanned procedure under general anesthesia, mostly due to obstructive symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Optimal timing for Soave primary pull-through in short-segment Hirschsprung disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal age for endorectal pull-through (ERPT) surgery in infants with short-segment Hirschsprung disease varies, with a trend toward earlier surgery. However, it is unclear if the timing of surgery impacts functional outcomes. We undertook the present study to determine the optimal timing of ERPT in infants with short-segment Hirschsprung disease.

METHODS

The NCBI PubMed database was searched for English-language manuscripts published between 2000 and 2019 analyzing functional outcomes for patient following the initial Soave ERPT for short-segment Hirschsprung disease. Raw data from these studies was obtained from the corresponding author for each manuscript. We combined data from these papers with our own institutional data and performed a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 780 infants were included in our meta-analysis. Constipation occurred in 1.0-31.7%, soiling 1.3-26.0%, anastomotic stricture 0.0-14.6%, and anastomotic leak 0.0-3.4%. Regarding age at ERPT, younger infants at the time of initial corrective surgery had higher rates of soiling, stricture, and leak. On sub-group analysis, patients <2.5 months at their initial corrective surgery had higher rates of soiling (25.9% vs. 11.4%, p<0.01), as well as stricture (10.0% vs 1.7%, p<0.01) and leak (5.5% vs 1.3%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

While age at Soave endorectal pull-through for short-segment Hirschsprung disease has decreased over time, functional outcomes associated with this trend have only recently been examined. Our findings suggest that patients <2.5 months old at the time of endorectal pull-through may have worse functional outcomes, emphasizing the need to consider further study of the timing of surgery in this population.

Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of neonatal versus delayed primary endorectal pull-through for children with Hirschsprung disease: A pediatric colorectal and pelvic learning consortium study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

the timing of endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD) is controversial. Neonatal primary endorectal pull-through theoretically prevents preoperative enterocolitis. Delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers the surgeon the benefit of more robust perineal anatomy and allows primary caregivers the time to emotionally process the diagnosis and to gain experience with rectal irrigations. We hypothesized that delayed primary endorectal pull-through would be associated with equivalent perioperative morbidity compared to the neonatal repair and would lead to improved long-term functional outcomes.

METHODS

we analyzed all patients in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry who had a primary endorectal pull-through for HD and at least three-and-one-half years of follow up in a specialty colorectal clinic. We evaluated patient demographics, operative outcomes, perioperative episodes of enterocolitis, and long-term functional outcomes for the neonatal (<31 days) and delayed (≥31 days) pull-through cohorts.

RESULTS

eighty-two patients were identified of whom 49 were operated upon in the neonatal period and 33 in a delayed fashion. The median age at operation was 11 days [IQR 7 - 19 days] for the neonatal cohort and 98 days [IQR 61 - 188 days] for the delayed cohort. Thirty-four (69.4%) of the neonatal and 22 (66.7%) of the delayed cohort patients had rectosigmoid transition zones. Four of 49 patients (8.1%) in the neonatal cohort were diagnosed with enterocolitis preoperatively compared to two of 33 (6.0%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.89). Eighteen of 49 patients (36.7%) in the neonatal cohort and 16 of 33 (48.5%) in the delayed cohort had at least one postoperative episode of enterocolitis (p = 0.38). Fifteen of 49 patients (30.6%) in the neonatal cohort were receiving bowel management for fecal incontinence at most recent follow up compared to five of 33 (15.2%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers a safe alternative to operation in the neonatal period and appears to have, at least, equivalent functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Laparoscopy-assisted Transanal Endorectal Pull-through for the Management of Hirschsprung's Disease in Nigeria: Report of Two Cases

Hirschsprung's disease is a relatively common disease in pediatric colorectal surgery. The treatment modalities have evolved from third-stage to single-stage in the past three decades. The single-stage procedure can be performed using the open, transanal or laparoscopy-assisted techniques. We use these cases to illustrate the first laparoscopically assisted procedures for Hirschsprung's disease in our center. The laparoscopic-assisted technique is described, and lessons in collaboration across institutions and within institutions are discussed.

Lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual functions after endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: controlled long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To define the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and outcomes for sexual function after endorectal pull-through (EPT) for Hirschsprung disease (HD) compared to controls. To date, similar controlled studies are lacking.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥4years (n=123) operated on for HD at our center between 1987 and 2011 were invited to answer questionnaires on LUTS and sexual function (aged ≥16years). Patients with an intellectual disability and patients with a definitive endostomy were excluded. Patients were matched to three controls and also invited to a clinical follow-up for urological investigations including urine flow measurement, renal tract ultrasound, and urinalysis.

RESULTS

Altogether, 59 responses concerning LUTS and 24 responses concerning sexual functions were analyzed. No significant differences were demonstrated in the overall prevalence of LUTS between patients (67%) and controls (80%), nor in the prevalence of frequent LUTS (14% vs. 16%; P=NS for both). One patient (2%) had a urethral stricture after laparotomy-assisted EPT. Male patients reported sexual satisfaction and erectile function similar to controls (P>0.10). Female patients were currently less in stable relationships compared to controls (25% vs. 83%, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the safety of EPT in patients with HD with regard to preservation of the integrity and functioning of the genitourinary tract.

Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: Comparison between partial and near total laparoscopic mobilization of rectum

Background:

Transanal pull-through with laparoscopic assistance is gaining popularity. How much rectal dissection to do laparoscopically and how much transanally is not clear. Laparoscopic rectal mobilization is akin to open pelvic dissection of Swenson's operation — the most physiological procedure. Through this comparative study, we aim to evolve a technique that maximizes the benefits of Swenson's technique and minimizes the problems of a transanal procedure.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty patients (19 boys and one girl, newborn to 6 years) with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) were randomized for laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATAPT) either by near complete (Group A) or partial (Group B) laparoscopic mobilization of rectum. Patients were followed up for at least 3 months. Demographic profile; operative details (time taken, blood loss, operative difficulty, and complications); postoperative course (duration of urinary catheter, oral feeding, and hospital stay); and follow-up stooling pattern, consistency, and continence were compared in the two groups.

Results:

The time taken for laparoscopic mobilization was marginally higher in group A, but the time taken for transanal dissection in this group was significantly less than in group B. All other comparisons showed no significant difference in the two groups. Stool frequency and continence improved with time in both groups.

Conclusion:

Extent of laparoscopic mobilization of rectum does not appear to be a factor deciding the outcomes. No recommendations could be made in view of the small number of cases. However, it shows that laparoscopic assistance can be used to maximize the benefits of Swenson type of operation and a transanal pull-through.