A Contingent Valuation Study for Eliciting a Monetary Value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the General Greek Population

OBJECTIVES

To elicit a willingness-to-pay (WTP) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimate for the general Greek population and assess the impact of individuals' socio-demographic characteristics and motives on this estimate.

METHODS

A telephone-based survey was carried out employing a representative sample of the general Greek population (n = 1342). A computer-assisted telephone-interview method was adopted to ensure random sampling. A total of 528 participants reported a WTP value for a utility improvement from their current health to perfect health. Those individuals' motives were assessed through predefined statements. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Multiple linear regression (MLR) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were conducted to assess the effect of socioeconomic/demographic determinants and motive statements, respectively, on WTP/QALY. MLR was re-estimated considering as dependent variable the WTP/QALY estimate calculated for participants: (1) stating a WTP value ≤ their household income and (2) presenting higher certainty regarding stated WTP value (sensitivity analysis).

RESULTS

Analysis revealed good reliability for WTP/QALY estimates and motive statements (ICC values > 0.8). Mean WTP/QALY was €26 280. The respective 5% trimmed value was €14 862. Being a student and household income affected WTP/QALY. Sensitivity analysis did not produce markedly different WTP/QALY predictors, implying the robustness of results, irrespective of the participant group considered. Individuals who indicated the inability to cover basic family needs or pay tax claims as motives reported lower WTP/QALY values compared with those not viewing these aspects as motives.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings confirm that the World Health Organization's criterion used currently in Greek cost-effectiveness studies is not unreasonable. Additional research is essential to further explore WTP/QALY estimates in the Greek setting and facilitate informed decision making.

Severe-to-profound hearing impairment: demographic data, gender differences and benefits of audiological rehabilitation

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify and report demographic data of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss, assess participation in audiological rehabilitation and analyze the benefits of various rehabilitation methods.Materials and methods: Data on 4286 patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairments registered in the Swedish Quality Register of Otorhinolaryngology over a period from 2006-2015 were studied. Demographic data, gender differences, audiological rehabilitation and benefits of the rehabilitation were analyzed.Results: Group rehabilitation and visits to a hearing rehabilitation educator provided the most benefits in audiological rehabilitation. Only 40.5% of the patients received extended audiological rehabilitation, of which 54.5% were women. A total of 9.5% of patients participated in group rehabilitation, with 59.5% being women. Women also visited technicians, welfare officers, hearing rehabilitation educators, psychologists and physicians and received communication rehabilitation in a group and fit with cochlea implants significantly more often than did men.Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of being given the opportunity to participate in group rehabilitation and meet a hearing rehabilitation educator to experience the benefits of hearing rehabilitation. There is a need to offer extended audiological rehabilitation, especially in terms of gender differences, to provide the same impact for women and men.Implications for RehabilitationSignificantly more women than men with severe-to-profound hearing impairment receive audiological rehabilitation.Hearing impairment appears to have a significantly more negative impact on women's quality of life than men's.It is important to offer extended audiological rehabilitation to all patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss to obtain an equal hearing health care regardless of gender.

Patients with severe-to-profound hearing impairment and simultaneous severe vision impairment: a quality-of-life study

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe vision impairment in combination with severe-to-profound hearing loss seem to have a higher risk for effects on QoL, including: mobility, the ability to provide self-care and perform usual activities, and levels of anxiety and depression, compared with patients with only severe-to-profound hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To study the quality-of-life (QoL) and audiological rehabilitation of the severely vision-impaired patient population among adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss in Sweden.

METHOD

A study of data collected from 543 patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss combined with severe vision impairment among the total of 2319 persons registered in the Swedish Quality Register of Otorhinolaryngology. QoL was measured with the following instruments: EQ5D, PIRS, and HADS. Audiological rehabilitation was described and evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients with dual sensory loss were younger, were more likely to live alone, and had a lower level of education than the control group. The QoL of the study group was significantly negatively affected. In total, 89% of the study group had been rehabilitated with hearing aids, while 8% had received rehabilitation with cochlear implants. A total of 32% of the study group had received extended audiological rehabilitation.