1
|
Murdoch J, Varley A, McCulloch J, Jones M, Thomas LB, Clark A, Stirling S, Turner D, Swart AM, Dresser K, Howard G, Saxton J, Hernon J. Implementing supportive exercise interventions in the colorectal cancer care pathway: a process evaluation of the PREPARE-ABC randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1137. [PMID: 34688257 PMCID: PMC8542291 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08880-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A colorectal resection is standard treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the procedure results in significant post-operative mortality and reduced quality of life. Maximising pre-operative cardiopulmonary fitness could improve post-surgical outcomes. PREPARE-ABC is a multi-centre, three-armed, randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of exercise interventions, with motivational support on short and longer-term recovery outcomes in CRC patients undergoing major lower-gastrointestinal surgery. The trial included an internal pilot phase with parallel process evaluation. The aim of the process evaluation was to optimise intervention implementation for the main trial. Methods Mixed methods process evaluation conducted in 14 UK hospitals between November 2016 and March 2018. Data included a site profile questionnaire and telephone scoping interview with hospital staff, 34 qualitative observations of standard care and 14 observations of intervention delivery, 13 semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and 28 semi-structured interviews with patients. Data analysis focused on describing intervention delivery within each arm, assessing fidelity, acceptability and how variation in delivery was linked to contextual characteristics. Results Standard care exercise advice was typically limited to maintaining current activity levels, and with lead-in time to surgery affecting whether any exercise advice was provided. Variation in HCP capacity affected the ability of colorectal units to deploy staff to deliver the intervention. Patients’ exercise history and motivation prior to surgery influenced HCP perceptions and delivery of the motivational components. Observations indicated a high level of fidelity to delivery of the exercise interventions. All but one of the 28 interviewed patients reported increasing exercise levels as a result of receiving the intervention, with most finding them motivational and greatly valuing the enhanced level of social support (versus standard care) provided by staff. Conclusion Hospital-supervised and home-based exercise interventions were highly acceptable for most patients undergoing surgery for CRC. Delivery of pre- and post-operative exercise within the CRC care pathway is feasible but systematic planning of capacity and resources is required to optimise implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08880-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Murdoch
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
| | - Anna Varley
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Jane McCulloch
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Megan Jones
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Laura B Thomas
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Susan Stirling
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - David Turner
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Ann Marie Swart
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Kerry Dresser
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Gregory Howard
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - John Saxton
- Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - James Hernon
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atoui S, Coca-Martinez M, Mahmoud I, Carli F, Liberman AS. Exercise intervention in cancer patients with sleep disturbances scheduled for elective surgery: Systematic review. Int J Surg 2021; 93:106069. [PMID: 34464753 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES Sleep disturbance is one of the patients' major complaints after major surgery and can impair postoperative recovery. Pre-operative exercise has been shown to increase functional capacity and resilience in cancer patients; scarce knowledge is available on the effects of pre-operative exercise on sleep disturbances. This systematic review aims to determine the impact of pre-operative exercise training alone or as part of multimodal prehabilitation on sleep disturbances and sleep quality in cancer patients. METHODS A systematic search including Biosis, Cochrane Library and CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) was performed to identify studies involving a pre-operative exercise intervention in cancer patients awaiting surgery. Trials had to contain at least one sleep measure, assessed subjectively and objectively were included in the systematic review. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials tool and the ROBINS-I tool for evaluating the risk of bias in non-randomized studies. RESULTS Seven studies were included (1 RCT, 2 non-RCTs and 4 single-arm design). Due to substantial heterogeneity in the interventions across studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted. The available empirical evidence on the presurgical effect of exercise on sleep outcomes is scarce and, overall, suggests that it has a limited effect. Besides, non-significant improvement of the pre-operative exercise on sleep was unique to the studies that used subjective measures to assess sleep disturbances changes during cancer treatment. CONCLUSION There are conflicting results and a lack of quality data proving the pre-operative exercise on sleep quality and disturbances. More research is needed in the pre-operative period using clinical sleep disturbances such as insomnia as an inclusion criterion, subjectively and objectively assessed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Loughney L, West MA, Moyses H, Bates A, Kemp GJ, Hawkins L, Varkonyi-Sepp J, Burke S, Barben CP, Calverley PM, Cox T, Palmer DH, Mythen MG, Grocott MPW, Jack S. The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and an in-hospital exercise training programme on physical fitness and quality of life in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a randomised controlled trial (The EMPOWER Trial). Perioper Med (Lond) 2021; 10:23. [PMID: 34154675 PMCID: PMC8216760 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-021-00190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EMPOWER trial aimed to assess the effects of a 9-week exercise prehabilitation programme on physical fitness compared with a usual care control group. Secondary aims were to investigate the effect of (1) the exercise prehabilitation programme on psychological health; and (2) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) on physical fitness and psychological health. METHODS Between October 2013 and December 2016, adults with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing standardised NCRT and surgery were recruited to a multi-centre trial. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and completed HRQoL questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L) pre-NCRT and post-NCRT (week 0/baseline). At week 0, patients were randomised to exercise prehabilitation or usual care (no intervention). CPET and HRQoL questionnaires were assessed at week 0, 3, 6 and 9, whilst semi-structured interviews were assessed at week 0 and week 9. Changes in oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO2 at AT (ml kg-1 min-1)) between groups were compared using linear mixed modelling. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were recruited, mean age 64 (10.4) years. Of the 38 patients, 33 were randomised: 16 to usual care and 17 to exercise prehabilitation (26 males and 7 females). Exercise prehabilitation significantly improved VO2 at AT at week 9 compared to the usual care. The change from baseline to week 9, when adjusted for baseline, between the randomised groups was + 2.9 ml kg -1 min -1; (95% CI 0.8 to 5.1), p = 0.011. CONCLUSION A 9-week exercise prehabilitation programme significantly improved fitness following NCRT. These findings have informed the WesFit trial (NCT03509428) which is investigating the effects of community-based multimodal prehabilitation before cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01914068 . Registered 1 August 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Loughney
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
- Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- ExWell Medical, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Malcolm A West
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
- Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Helen Moyses
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew Bates
- Departments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Bournemouth NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Graham J Kemp
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology and MRC - Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lesley Hawkins
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
- Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Judit Varkonyi-Sepp
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Shaunna Burke
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher P Barben
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Peter M Calverley
- Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Trevor Cox
- Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel H Palmer
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael G Mythen
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael P W Grocott
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK.
- Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Sandy Jack
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Road, Southampton, UK
- Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|