Therapeutic artifact: Case series

Artifacts are pervasive in every realm of biological science, and this includes the field of medicine. Unless explicitly recognized by scientific experts, artifacts can be found and may influence research and findings in the medical domain, just as they do in other branches of biological science. Therapeutic artifacts are changes that occur in the body as a result of medical interventions. These artifacts can sometimes pose challenges in forensic investigations, as they may be misinterpreted or mistaken for signs of trauma or foul play. This case series presents three cases illustrating different types of treatment artifacts encountered in forensic medicine. These three cases highlight the importance of considering medical interventions and therapies when interpreting autopsy findings. It is crucial for forensic experts to have a comprehensive understanding of therapeutic artifacts to accurately differentiate them from genuine injuries or pathologies. By recognizing and properly interpreting these artifacts, forensic investigations can be conducted with increased accuracy and ensure that justice is served.

The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court

When a capital crime is committed the post-mortem interval (PMI) is of particular importance in investigating a suspect's alibi in court. A forensic expert can use different methods to estimate the PMI. This research focuses on who is considered an expert in court and whether the methods used to estimate the PMI are reliable. In this study, the methods used to estimate the PMI and the experts consulted, available in Dutch jurisprudence, in the period 2010-2019 were investigated. Ninety-four judicial cases were included and multiple experts and methods of estimating the PMI were found. As part of this study, the methods that were used to estimate the PMI in court were subjected to the Daubert criteria. Of these methods, only the Henssge nomogram and entomological methods met the Daubert criteria. However, the methods are only useful when applied by the right forensic expert and in the right manner. Unfortunately, this was not always the case.