Internal fixation of radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis: a case series

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis (RI-FFP) is not well evaluated due to the rarity of the condition.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prevalence of RI-FFP, the radiological and clinical outcomes as well as the complications of patients treated with internal fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our database was performed to identify all surgically treated patients with RI-FFP. Surgical stabilization was recommended for patients with FFP type III and FFP type IV. Surgical stabilization was also recommended after 5-7 days for patients with FFP type II in case of unsuccessful conservative treatment. Demographic data, fracture patterns according to the FFP classification of Rommens and Hofmann, type of treatment and surgery-related complications including nonunion, hardware failure, fracture progression (secondary fracture) or infection were documented.

RESULTS

Among 500 patients with FFP, the prevalence of patients with RI-FFP was 1% (5/500): 5 patients with a median age of 79 years (76-79). The median time interval from radiation to fracture was 18 months (18-24). All of them underwent internal fixation. Two patients experienced surgery-related complications, one due to hardware failure and one due to fracture progression. At median follow-up of 27 months, all fractures had healed. Patients reached a good level of mobility with a median Parker Mobility Score of 7 and suffered moderate pain with a median value of 2.5 on the numeric rating scale.

CONCLUSION

RI-FFP remains a rare injury (1%). In our experience, patients, who underwent surgical treatment, obtained a high level of mobility and a moderate pain score after 2 years of follow-up. Internal fixation can be recommended in RI-FFP. Because bone healing may be impaired due to previous irradiation, highly stable constructs are required to avoid fracture progression or revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective study.

Progression to Rommens type IIIa fragility fracture of the pelvis managed by delayed open reduction and interdigitating screw fixation: A case report

Efficient management of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) is established during the acute phase of injury. However, a small number of FFPs exhibit fracture progression with increased instability over time. Fracture progression is typically seen in sacral fractures and rare in iliac fractures. Herein, we present the case of a 72-year-old woman with Rommens type IIIa FFP, following an isolated iliac fracture. It was successfully treated four months after the initial injury with retrograde suprapubic screw fixation via the anterior intra-pelvic approach and percutaneous lateral compression type-2 screw fixation using an interdigitating technique.

Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation

PURPOSE

Pelvic fragility fractures have steadily risen over the past decades. The primary treatment goal is the fastest possible mobilisation. If conservative therapy fails, surgical fixation is a promising approach. This study compares the outcome of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation (BTS) and spinopelvic fixation (SP) as minimally invasive techniques for bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum (BFFS).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, non-randomised, case-controlled study. Patients were included if they remained bedridden due to pain despite conservative treatment. Group assignment depended on sacral anatomy and fracture type. The outcome was estimated by blood loss calculation, cut-seam time, fluoroscopy time, complications, duration of stay at the intensive/intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC), and total inpatient stay. The mobility level at discharge was recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included (SP: 49, BTS: 24). There was no difference in blood loss (BTS: 461 ± 628 mL, SP: 509 ± 354 mL). BTS showed a significantly lower cut-seam time (72 ± 23 min) than SP (94 ± 27 min). Fluoroscopy time did not differ (BTS: 111 ± 61 s vs. 103 ± 45 s). Thirteen percent of BTS and 16% of SP patients required ICU/IMC stay (BTS: 0.6 ± 1.8 days, SP: 0.5 ± 1.5 days) during inpatient stay (BTS: 9 ± 4 days, SP: 8 ± 3 days). Fourteen patients suffered from urinary tract infections (BTS: 8%; SP: 25%). In-patient mortality was low (BTS: 4.2%, SP: 4.1%). At discharge, the BTS group was almost back to the initial mobility level. In SP patients, mobility was significantly lower than before complaints (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Both methods allow early mobilization of BFFS patients. Blood loss can be kept low. Hence, transfusion requirement is correspondingly low. The IMC/ICU and the total inpatient stay are lower than reported in the literature. Both BTS and SP can be recommended as safe and low-complication methods for use in BFFS patients. BTS is superior to SP with respect to surgery duration and level of mobility at discharge.

Internal fixation for fragility fracture of pelvis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease with a prevalence of 0.1 %–1.4 %. The most common vertebral fractures associated with ankylosing spondylitis are cervical spine injuries due to low-energy trauma, whereas pelvic fractures are rare. Conversely, fragility fracture of the pelvis is a fracture of the pelvic ring caused by low-energy trauma with a background of bone fragility. In recent years, minimally invasive surgery for early mobilization of displaced fragility fracture of the pelvis has been reported. We report herein a case of a 91-year-old male with ankylosing spondylitis who underwent internal fixation for fragility fracture of his pelvis. He was brought to the emergency room with a complaint of pain in the right hip after a fall from a standing position at home. Computed tomography showed a fracture of the right pubis and a fracture, which crossed the sacrum from the ilium with a maximum dislocation. There was also extensive ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracolumbar spine and bony ankylosis of both sacroiliac joints. The diagnosis after the injury was fragility fracture of the pelvis, which complicated by ankylosing spondylitis. The fracture type did not match the Rommens and Hofmann classification criteria. Iliac intramedullary stabilization was performed in accordance with the treatment of Rommens and Hofmann classification type IIIa. The patient's pain reduced a day after the surgery, and he was able to use a wheelchair. He was able to walk with a cane two months after the surgery, and bone union was achieved four months postsurgery.

Iliac intramedullary stabilization was useful in patients with atypical fractures a) that did not fit the Rommens and Hofmann classification criteria owing to the presence of ankylosing spondylitis, and b) in cases wherein strong fixation was considered necessary.

High prevalence of missed information related on bone health in orthogeriatric patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis-an institutional register-based analysis

This is the first study that highlighted the amount of missed information related on bone health in orthogeriatric patients suffering fragility fractures of the pelvis and also evaluated its prevalence and differing etiology in the assessed patients, regarding osteoporosis and/or osteomalacia, based on laboratory and instrumental measurements. This evaluation should become a standardized procedure in the treatment of orthogeriatric patients presenting with a FFP.

INTRODUCTION

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are common in orthogeriatric patients. Secondary fracture prevention regarding evaluation and treatment of an underlying osteoporosis or osteomalacia is still often neglected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of missed information related on bone health in older adult FFP patients, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in assessed patients, and if fracture type-dependent distribution patterns could be observed.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of an institutional register was performed. Patients aged 80 years and older (n = 456) admitted with a FFP from 01/2003 until 12/2019 to a level I trauma center were included.

RESULTS

In 456 patients, FFP type II were leading (66.7%). Diagnostics were conducted in 37.1% of the patients regarding measurement of vitamin D levels and 21.7% regarding DXA measurements; vitamin D deficiency was observed in 62.7%, indicators for an underlying osteomalacia in 45.8%, and an osteoporosis in 46.5% of the assessed patients.

CONCLUSION

Although FFP are common and will increase, there is still a lack of secondary fracture prevention, starting with information related on bone health. In the assessed patients, a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was present, but no significant correlation between vitamin D level and type of fracture was observed. Ongoing education for varying etiology and specific treatment of these fractures is necessary, as surgical treatment was unified, but drug therapy remains different.

Self-rated health status and activities of daily living in the first 12 months after fragility fractures of the pelvis-a prospective study on 134 patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in activities of daily living and self-reported health status in the first year after fragility fractures of the pelvis. We found out that these fractures lead to a significant, long-lasting deterioration of both parameters, comparable with hip fractures.

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the development and to identify influencing factors in activities of daily living (ADL) and self-reported health status (HS) in the first year after fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).

METHODS

A total of 134 patients with FFP ≥ 60 years were included. ADL were measured using the Barthel index (BI) and the IADL scale pre-fracture, at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. HS was evaluated using the EQ-5D questionnaire at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Multiple regression analysis and hierarchical linear models were applied to identify influencing factors in ADL and HS.

RESULTS

The BI was 95 pre-fracture, 75 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), 80 at 6 months (p = 0.178), and 80 at 12 months (p = 0.149). The IADL was 6 pre-fracture, 3 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), 4 at 6 months (p = 0.004), and 4 at 12 months (p = 0.711). The EQ-5D index was 0.70 at 6 weeks, 0.788 at 6 months (p = 0.158), and 0.788 at 12 months (p = 0.798). Significant influencing factors in the multiple regression analysis were pre-fracture nursing care level for all scores; pre-fracture mobility for BI; and pre-fracture IADL, ASA score, and age for IADL. Significant influencing factors in the hierarchical linear model were pre-fracture nursing care level for all scores; pre-fracture IADL, ASA score, age, and time for IADL; and pre-fracture mobility, sex, and time for the EQ-5D.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that FFP lead to a significant, long-lasting deterioration in ADL and HS, comparable with hip fractures.

Is cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation with partially threaded screws superior to that with fully threaded screws concerning compression and pull-out force in fragility fractures of the sacrum? - a biomechanical analysis

Background

Providing a stable osteosynthesis in fragility fractures of the pelvis can be challenging. Cement augmentation increases screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. Generating interfragmentary compression by using a lag screw also improves the stability. However, it is not known if interfragmentary compression can be achieved in osteoporotic sacral bone by cement augmentation of lag screws.

The purpose of this study was to compare cement-augmented sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis using partially versus fully threaded screws in osteoporotic hemipelvises concerning compression of fracture gap and pull-out force.

Methods

Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric pelvises with osteoporosis were used. In all specimens, one side was treated with an augmented fully threaded screw (group A), and the other side with an augmented partially threaded screw (group B) after generating a vertical osteotomy on both sides of each sacrum. Afterwards, first a compression test with fracture gap measurement after tightening of the screws was performed, followed by an axial pull-out test measuring the maximum pull-out force of the screws.

Results

The fracture gap was significantly wider in group A (mean: 1.90 mm; SD: 1.64) than in group B (mean: 0.91 mm; SD: 1.03; p = 0.028).

Pull-out force was higher in group A (mean: 1696 N; SD: 1452) than in group B (mean: 1616 N; SD: 824), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.767).

Conclusions

Cement augmentation of partially threaded screws in sacroiliac screw fixation allows narrowing of the fracture gap even in osteoporotic bone, while resistance against pull-out force is not significantly lower in partially threaded screws compared to fully threaded screws.

Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis - a systematic review

Background

The incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly patient is rising. This brings an increasing burden on health and social care systems as these injuries often lead to prolonged hospital admissions, loss of independence, morbidity and mortality. Some centres now advocate stabilisation of these injuries to reduce pain, facilitate early mobilisation, decrease hospital stay and restore independence. A systematic review of the literature was planned to establish the evidence for this intervention.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A clinical librarian performed a search of the following databases: NHS Evidence, TRIP, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Seventeen eligible studies were identified with 766 patients.

Results

The quality of evidence was poor with no good quality randomised trials. The majority of injuries were minimally displaced. Posterior ring injuries were most often stabilised with percutaneous screws which were sometimes augmented with void filler. A number of techniques were described for stabilisation of the anterior ring although fixation of the anterior ring was frequently not performed.

There was consistent evidence from the included studies that operative intervention significantly improved pain. Complications were minimal but there were increased failure rates when a single unaugmented sacroiliac joint screw was used. The limited availability of non-operative comparators made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy of surgical over non-surgical management in these patients.

Conclusions

Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis should be considered for patients failing a brief period of non-operative management, however prospective randomised trials need to be performed to provide improved evidence for this intervention. Surgeons should consider which fixation techniques for fragility fractures of the pelvis are robust enough to allow immediate weightbearing, whilst minimising operative morbidity and post-operative complications.

PROSPERO Systematic Review ID: CRD42020171237.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04579-w.

Stability of internal versus external fixation in osteoporotic pelvic fractures - a biomechanical analysis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis-related fragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFP) differ fundamentally from pelvic fractures in younger patients. However, very little is known about biomechanical stability of different osteosynthesis procedures addressing the anterior pelvic ring in these fractures. The aim of this study was to compare standard external fixation with internal fixation using a novel screw-and-rod system in osteoporotic fractures of the pelvic ring in terms of stiffness, plastic deformation and maximum load under cyclic loading in a human cadaveric model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 18 embalmed osteoporotic cadaver pelvis specimens were randomized based on the T-score into a group for external fixation and a group for internal fixation. FFP type-IIB fractures were created. In addition to the external or internal fixator, a cement-augmented sacroiliac screw was implanted. Afterwards, axial cyclic loading was performed in a testing setup simulating one-leg stand.

RESULTS

Mean plastic deformation and stiffness both were significantly better in the internal fixation group than in the external fixation group (plastic deformation: 0.37 mm (SD: 0.23) versus 0.71 mm (SD: 0.26), p = 0.011; stiffness: 43.69 N/mm (SD: 18.39) versus 26.52 N/mm (SD: 9.76), p = 0.029). Maximum load did not differ significantly between internal fixator (506.3 N; SD: 129.4) and external fixator (461.1 N; SD: 147.4) (p = 0.515).

CONCLUSIONS

Submuscular internal fixation might be an interesting alternative to external fixation in clinical practice because of better biomechanical properties as well as several advantages in clinical use.

Minimal-invasive stabilization of anterior pelvic ring fractures with retrograde transpubic screws

BACKGROUND

In the vast majority of patients with pelvic ring lesions, there is a combination of fractures of the posterior and anterior pelvic ring. Anterior fractures are painful and contribute to loss of stability of the pelvic ring. For these reasons, stabilization of pubic rami fractures is recommended together with posterior pelvic ring fixation. Retrograde transpubic screw osteosynthesis enjoys increasing acceptance due to its minimal invasive technique and adequate stability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 158 retrograde transpubic screw osteosyntheses in 128 patients with pelvic ring lesions including a pubic ramus fracture. Sixty-three patients suffered a high-energy injury, 65 a fragility fracture of the pelvis.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six screws (92.4%) were inserted through a percutaneous procedure. There were no vascular, neurological or urological complications. Fifty-nine screws (39%) yielded an excellent reduction with less than one cortical width of displacement. Slight secondary displacement was seen in 33 of these fractures (55.9%). Early surgical complications were seen in 16 screws (10.1%): suboptimal pathway in 10, local hematoma in 4 and local infection in 3. Early revision surgery was done in 7 screws (4.4%). Median follow-up was 27.6 weeks, 83 screws (52.5%) had a follow-up of more than 6 months. During follow-up, 7.6% of screws loosened. Operative revision was performed in 13%. 75 fractures (90.3%) with a follow-up of ≥ 6 months showed radiographic evidence of healing. There was no difference in the healing rate of high-energy and fragility fractures. Nonunion rate was not dependent on the quality of primary reduction, secondary displacement, or screw loosening. Infection (p 0.001) and surgery ≥ 6 months after trauma (p 0.02) more often led to nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde transpubic screw osteosynthesis is a reliable method for splinting pubic rami fractures in high and low energy pelvic trauma. Although a slight secondary fracture displacement is seen in most cases, it does not affect fracture healing. Retrograde transpubic screw is a adequate minimal-invasive osteosynthesis to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring, especially in fragility fracture of the pelvis. Delayed operation (> 6 months) and infection show higher rate of nonunion.

Low acceptance of osteoanabolic therapy with parathyroid hormone in patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis in routine clinical practice: a retrospective observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

A recent randomized controlled trial has reported full patient compliance and no adverse events from therapy with parathyroid hormone (PTH) for osteoporosis and accelerated healing of fragility fractures of the pelvis. The purpose of the presented study was to evaluate if similar results can be achieved with comprehensive PTH therapy in routine clinical practice. We hypothesised that patients' burden of PTH therapy is underestimated in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Osteoanabolic PTH therapy was recommended to 79 patients suffering from an acute fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP). Case finding, initiation of therapy and follow-up were performed by a fracture liaison service team. Primary outcome was PTH initiation rate. Secondary outcomes were implementation rate of alternative antiresorptive pharmaceutical therapy for osteoporosis and participation rate in a bone metabolic workup. Adverse events and effects potentially related to the therapy with bone-active drugs were documented as exploratory outcomes.

RESULTS

Osteoanabolic PTH therapy as suggested was accepted by 32%, whereas antiresorptive therapy was implemented in another 14% of the patients. DEXA scans were available in 38% of the patients (+ 27% when compared to baseline). A bone-specific laboratory analysis was done in 18 patients, uncovering 7 pathological findings. Two patients terminated PTH therapy early because of side effects.

CONCLUSION

The experiences with PTH therapy in FFP patients with respect to, implementation rate, frequency of side effects and of pathological findings in laboratory controls as reported from a previous RCT could not be reproduced in routine clinical practice.

Fragility fracture of pelvis caused by amenorrheic osteoporosis operated upon using computed-tomography-3D-fluoroscopy matching navigation system: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Low-energy trauma fractures of older people cause fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs), and secondary amenorrhea triggers osteoporosis that might lead to FFPs. Anorexia nervosa is a major causative factor in secondary amenorrhea, thus, FFPs might be a problem for young anorexia nervosa patients as well as older people. Here, we report a rare case of a young woman with anorexia nervosa who had an FFP, followed by gradual progression of severe sacral deformity.

CASE

A 49-year-old woman with hypothalamic amenorrhea (a subtype of secondary amenorrhea) caused by anorexia nervosa fell from a chair. She visited a nearby hospital and was diagnosed with an undisplaced sacral fracture; however, she chose to stay at home since the pain was slight and she could still walk. She fell to the floor several times while injured, and 3 months later, she had walking difficulty accompanied with severe pain, and was admitted to our facility. On radiological examination, she was diagnosed with FFP with severe sacral deformity, and was treated surgically. Because of the severe sacral deformity, a computed tomography (CT)-3D-fluoroscopy matching navigation system was used during surgery to support appropriate placement of percutaneous iliosacral (IS) and transiliac-trans-sacral (TITS) screws.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of FFP caused by amenorrheic osteoporosis, treated by matching navigation. This matching navigation could be a supportive tool in inserting IS and TITS screws during surgery for FFPs, especially in cases with severe deformity.

Good functional outcome in patients suffering fragility fractures of the pelvis treated with percutaneous screw stabilisation: Assessment of complications and factors influencing failure

BACKGROUND

Low energy pelvic ring fractures in the elderly have traditionally been treated conservatively, a treatment with potential long-term complications and loss of self-independence. Percutaneous screw stabilisation of the posterior pelvic ring is a new treatment modality that enables immediate mobilisation. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome after sacroiliac stabilisation in the elderly.

METHODS

All elderly patients with a surgically stabilised low energy pelvic fracture between 2010 and 2015 were included. In 2016 a radiographic follow up and functional test was performed at least one year postoperative.

RESULTS

The 50 operated patients had a mean age of 79 years and a one-year mortality of 10% (5/50). Only six patients lost independency after the pelvic fracture and moved to nursing home. The mean Timed Up and Go test was 16s at follow-up. The operation of the posterior pelvic ring averaged 63min with a radiation equal to a diagnostic pelvic CT. One intra-foraminally placed screw was immediately removed and 9 patients were later re-operated on due to symptomatic loosening of one or more screws. No loosening of screws was seen in 11 patients where both S1 and S2 were stabilised and out of 23 trans-sacral screws (crossing both sacroiliac joints) only two loosened.

DISCUSSION

CT guided stabilisation of the posterior pelvis is safe and most patients resumed good function and independent living. The risk of a revision operation was 20%, but trans-sacral screw stabilisation in both S1 and S2 could reduce the risk of implant loosening.