1
|
Delpero JR, Sauvanet A. Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: 2019 French Recommendations Based on a Literature Review From 2008 to 6-2019. Front Oncol 2020; 10:40. [PMID: 32117714 PMCID: PMC7010716 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Vascular resection remains a subject of debate in the management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These French recommendations were drafted on behalf of the French National Institute of Cancer (INCA-2019). Material and Methods: A systematic literature search, with PubMed, Medline® (OvidSP), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, was performed for abstracts published in English from January 2008 to June 2019, and identified systematic reviews/metaanalyses, retrospective analyses and case series dedicated to vascular resections in the setting of PDAC. All selected articles were graded for level of evidence and strength of recommendation was given according to the GRADE system. Results: Neoadjuvant treatment should be performed rather than direct surgery in borderline and locally advanced non-metastatic PDAC with venous and/or arterial infiltration (T4 stage). Patients who respond or those with stable disease and good performance status should undergo surgical exploration to assess resectability because cross-sectional imaging often fails to identify the extent of the remaining viable tumor. Combining vascular resection with pancreatectomy in these cases increases the feasibility of curative resection which is still the only option to improve long-term survival. Venous resection (VR) is recommended if resection is possible in the presence of limited lateral or circumferential involvement but without venous occlusion and in the absence of arterial contact with the celiac axis (CA; cephalic tumors) or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; all tumor locations) (Grade B). The patients should be in good general condition because mortality and morbidity are higher than following pancreatectomy without VR (Grade B). In case of planned VR, neoadjuvant treatment is recommended since it improves both rate of R0 resections and survival compared to upfront surgery (Grade B). Due to their complexity and specificities, arterial resection (AR; mainly the hepatic artery (HA) or the CA) must be discussed in selected patients, in multidisciplinary team meetings in tertiary referral centers, according to the tumor location and the type of arterial extension. In case of invasion of a short segment of the common HA, resection with arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy. In case of SMA invasion, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by laparotomy with dissection and biopsy of peri-arterial tissues. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with SMA-resection is not recommended if the frozen section examination is positive (Grade C). In case of distal PDAC with invasion of the CA, a distal pancreatectomy with CA-resection without arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy and radiologic embolization of the CA branches (expert opinion). Conclusion: For PDAC with vascular involvement, neoadjuvant treatment followed by pancreatectomy with venous resection or even arterial resection can be proposed as a curative option in selected patients with selected vascular involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Robert Delpero
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.,Université Paris VII - Denis Diderot, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brissart H, Planton M, Bilger M, Bulteau C, Forthoffer N, Guinet V, Hennion S, Kleitz C, Laguitton V, Mirabel H, Mosca C, Pécheux N, Pradier S, Samson S, Tramoni E, Voltzenlogel V, Denos M, Boutin M. French neuropsychological procedure consensus in epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 100:106522. [PMID: 31627076 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuropsychological assessment is an integral component of the surgical procedure in patients with epilepsy. As no French consensus for neuropsychological assessment was available, the main goal of this work was to define French neuropsychological procedure consensus in regard to literature review. METHOD A panel of expert in neuropsychology was created within the framework of the French League Against Epilepsy. A systematic search of publications from 1950 to 2017 listed in PubMed database was conducted leading to a classification of articles according to their level of scientific evidence. French neuropsychological procedure consensus was then carried out with an expert panel of expert. RESULTS Low scientific evidence of neuropsychological data was reported. A panel of expert proposed a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment procedure including the exploration of intellectual efficiency, long-term memory, short-term and working memory, attention, executive functions, processing speed and motor skills, language, visual processing, praxis, psychobehavioral, and social cognition. DISCUSSION A common procedure for assessing cognitive and psychobehavioral function is now available in patients with epilepsy undergoing surgical evaluation have been established, they may help to improve the quality of care and the patient experience. This work highlights the need of furthers investigations and the necessity to develop specific tools with normative data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Brissart
- Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Service de Neurologie, F-54000 Nancy, France.
| | - M Planton
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, France
| | - M Bilger
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Hautepierre, CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Bulteau
- Pediatric Neurosurgery Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France; Memory, Brain and Cognition (MC2Lab, EA 7536), Institute of Psychology Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - N Forthoffer
- Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000 Nancy, France
| | - V Guinet
- Department of Functional Neurology and Epileptology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - S Hennion
- Reference Center Rare Epilepsies, Epilepsy Unit, Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, U1171 Degenerative and vascular cognitive disorders, Lille, France
| | - C Kleitz
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Hautepierre, CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - V Laguitton
- CINAPSE, Hôpital Henri Gastaut Centre Saint Paul, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - H Mirabel
- Neurology Department, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - C Mosca
- Epilepsy Unit, CHU, Grenoble-Alpes, France
| | | | - S Pradier
- Functional Explorations of the Nervous System, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University Hospital Center Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Samson
- Neurology Department, APHP, Paris, France; Equipe Neuropsychologie: Audition, Cognition et Action (EA 4072), UFR de psychologie, Université Lille-Nord de France, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - E Tramoni
- INSERM U 751, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France
| | - V Voltzenlogel
- Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches en Psychopathologie et Psychologie de la Santé, Université de Toulouse, UT2J, Toulouse, France
| | - M Denos
- Neurology Department, APHP, Paris, France
| | - M Boutin
- GHU-Paris Pôle Neuro-Sainte-Anne - Neurosurgery Unity 1, rue Cabanis, PARIS, France
| |
Collapse
|