Tandon R, Singal G, Chand Arya R, Sachdeva S, Goyal A, Takkar Chhabra S, Aslam N, Singh Wander G, Mohan B, Batta A. Role of two-dimensional strain echocardiographic parameters in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients with initial non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and troponins: An observational study.
Echocardiography 2023;
40:802-809. [PMID:
37417914 DOI:
10.1111/echo.15647]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often challenging especially in presence of initial normal troponins and non-specific electrocardiogram. The index study aimed at determining the diagnostic value of strain echocardiography in patients with suspected ACS but with non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and echocardiography findings.
METHODS
The study was conducted on 42 patients with suspected ACS and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms, normal quantitative troponin-T levels, and left ventricular function. All patients underwent conventional and 2D-strain echocardiography followed by coronary angiography, within 24 h of admission. Patients with regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), valvular heart disease, suspected myocarditis, and past coronary artery disease (CAD) were excluded.
RESULTS
Amongst the global strains, the global circumferential strain (GCS) was significantly reduced (p = .014) amongst those with significant CAD on angiography as opposed to global longitudinal strain (GLS) which was similar in the two groups (p = .33). The GCS/GLS ratio was also significantly reduced in patients with significant CAD compared to those with normal/mild disease on coronary angiography (p = .025). Both the parameters had good accuracy in predicting significant CAD. GCS displayed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 86% at an optimal cut-off 31.5% (AUROC: .93, 95% CI: .601-1.000; p = .03), and likewise GCS/GLS ratio had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity and 86% at a cut-off of 1.89% (AUROC: .86, 95% CI: .592-1.000; p = .049). GLS and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) did not differ significantly in patients with/without significant CAD (p = .32 and .58, respectively).
CONCLUSION
GCS and GCS/GLS ratio provides incremental value in comparison to GLS, PALS, and tissue Doppler indices (E/e') in patients with suspected ACS and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and troponins. GCS at cut-off of >31.5% and GCS/GLS ratio >1.89 can reliably exclude patients with significant CAD in this setting.
Collapse