Recent advancements in the sensors for food analysis to detect gluten: A mini-review [2019-2023]

People with celiac disease or gluten sensitivity may experience an immune reaction to the protein called gluten, which is present in wheat, barley, and rye. A strict gluten-free diet is the sole cure for these ailments. There are chances of food fraud about the claim of being gluten-free food items. As a result, there is a rising need for trustworthy and precise ways to identify gluten. There are many methods to detect gluten in food samples viz., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay 1 Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), Electrochemical sensors, Fluorescence-based sensors, etc. The use of sensors is one of the most promising methods for gluten detection. For detecting gluten, a variety of sensors, including optical, electrochemical, and biosensors, have been developed with different limits of detection and sensitivity. The present review reports the recent advancements (2019-2023) in the development of sensors for gluten detection in food. We may conclude that sensitivity and limit of detection are not related to the type of sensor used (aptamer or antibody-based), however, there are advancements, with the year, on the simplicity of the material used like paper-based sensors and paradigm shift to reagent free sensors by the spectral analysis. Also, recent work shows the potential of IoT-based studies for gluten detection.

Deep-Dive Directions for Dietitians (DDDDs): a roadmap for the nutritional management of poorly responsive coeliac disease patients

A substantial number of coeliac disease patients fail to respond to treatment with a gluten-free diet. Non-responsiveness might be multifactorial and the spectrum ranges from intentional or inadvertent gluten contamination as the main aetiology, to sensitivity to other nutrients (in addition to additives and preservatives). If the diagnosis of coeliac disease is correctly made and cross contamination and other factors have been excluded, then the aetiology behind the symptoms of a small group of coeliac patients might be refractory coeliac disease. The journey to ensure gluten contamination is not behind the persistent symptoms, is very challenging and requires in-depth training and skills. We therefore present potential guidance for the healthcare professional, in particular dietitians, on how to navigate these challenges on this journey.

Gluten contamination in labelled gluten-free, naturally gluten-free and meals in food services in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The gluten-free diet is based on the consumption of foods without gluten, which aims to manage celiac disease. The concern of celiac patients is that these foods should be safe. However, gluten contamination can affect these foods. The objectives of this review and meta-analysis were first, to identify articles that detected gluten contamination in gluten-free foods using validated methods. Second, to quantify the overall prevalence of gluten contamination of naturally gluten-free foods, labelled gluten-free products, and meals prepared in food services. Third, to highlight the influence of the country's income and the period of study on this prevalence. The studies were identified in Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Forty articles were included according to PRISMA guidelines. The statistical meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc 19 software. The results show that in the gluten-free foods analysed, the overall prevalence of gluten contamination was estimated at 15.12% (95% CI: 9.56%-21.70%), with more than 20 mg/kg of gluten. Naturally gluten-free foods were significantly more contaminated than labelled gluten-free products and than meals in food services (28.32%; 9.52%; 4.66% respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, it was noticed that oats were the most contaminated food. In addition, the prevalence of gluten contamination has significantly decreased over time. The majority of the studies were carried out in upper-middle-income and high-income countries, while only one study was conducted in lower-middle income countries. Therefore, it is necessary to implement preventive actions to reduce gluten contamination, ensuring safe gluten-free foods for celiac patients, including low-income countries.

Potential ways for gluten contamination of gluten-free grain and gluten-free foods: the buckwheat case

Buckwheat has been reported to be responsible for gluten contamination in manufactured gluten-free foods (mGFFs) although it is inherently gluten-free (GF). It could happen through buckwheat grains contacting gluten-containing (GC) grains and surfaces contacted by GC grains during pre-manufacturing practices. To simulate grain contact, whole and broken GC grains (wheat, rye, barley, and oat) were mixed into buckwheat grains at the ratio of 2.5-10.0%. Grains were agitated in vessels with inner surfaces covered with buckwheat grain. Gluten was not detected in buckwheat grains contacting whole GC grains at all mixing ratios. It was not detected in the case of broken GC grains at the mixing ratio of 2.5% and oat grains at all mixing ratios. Gluten concentration increased with the increasing mixing ratio and the natural gluten concentration of broken GC grains. To simulate surface contact, GC grains were first agitated in galvanised steel vessels and then buckwheat grains were agitated together under the same conditions. Gluten was detected on galvanised steel surfaces contacted by whole and broken GC grains. It was not detected in buckwheat grains contacting the surfaces contaminated by whole GC grains. Gluten was detected in buckwheat grain in the case of the broken GC grains except for oats. Gluten concentrations increased with increasing natural gluten concentration of GC grains. Contamination of mGFFs could be linked to potential contact with buckwheat grain. This contamination issue could be resolved through regulations mandating the proof of being GF for ingredients used in the production of mGFFs.