Does Prolonged Infusion Time Really Improve the Efficacy of Meropenem Therapy? A Prospective Study in Critically Ill Patients

Introduction

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic, which has demonstrated excellent antimicrobial activity against gram-negative clinical isolates. It is also commonly used in critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of meropenem in critically ill patients and whether prolonged injection duration is really beneficial to meropenem therapy.

Methods

We included 209 samples in 64 patients in this prospective study. PPK analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were developed using Phoenix.

Results

A two-compartment model described the data adequately. Clearance (CL), volume (V), clearance of peripheral compartment (CL₂), and volume of peripheral compartment (V₂) were 6.15 l/h, 2.83 l/h, 17.40 l, and 17.48 l, respectively. Creatinine clearance and uric acid were significant covariates. Patients with creatinine clearance ≤ 60 ml/min and uric acid > 400 μmol/l could achieve the target > 90% under the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 mg/l, even with the administration dose of 500 mg/8 h with a 2-h infusion. Prolonging the infusion time significantly improved the therapeutic effect when MIC < 4. However, for the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of 100% fT > MIC and 100% fT > 4 MIC, no significant statistical difference was observed in critically ill patients.

Conclusions

Critically ill patients with lower creatinine clearance and higher uric acid levels tended to need a lower dosage of meropenem. Prolonged infusion time was not always beneficial for those who needed a higher therapeutic target (100% fT > MIC, 100% fT > 4 MIC) or with MIC > 4 mg/l. Increasing dose or alternative therapeutic strategies may be required for critically ill patients with drug-resistant or severe infections. The study is of great significance to guide the rational use of meropenem in critically ill patients.

Trial Registration

The trial was registered in the China Clinical Trial (ChiCTR1900020672). Registered on 12 January 2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00551-2.

Meropenem is commonly used empirically or targeted in critically ill patients for bacterial infection. Many studies have reported that prolonged infusion time can improve the efficacy of meropenem therapy. However, we are skeptical about that. Meanwhile, prolonged injections can sometimes cause mobility problems for patients. A quantitative method is used to evaluate meropenem use. It is called the population pharmacokinetic model or pharmacodynamic study. Using this method, we found two significant influencing factors of meropenem metabolism: creatinine clearance and uric acid level. It is likely that patients with a lower level of creatinine clearance and a high uric acid level tend to require lower dosages of meropenem. As for the effect of infusion time, Monte Carlo simulation was used, which can do 3000 simulations on an individual. The result was complex. We found infusion time was beneficial only when bacteria were sensitive to meropenem. The evidence suggests that prolonged injection duration sometimes does not significantly improve the outcome of antimicrobial therapy.

Hospital Readmissions and Mortality Among Intubated and Mechanically Ventilated Adult Subjects With Pneumonia Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections in ICUs and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Gram-negative bacteria cause 55-85% of hospital-acquired pneumonia and are associated with increased mortality.

METHODS

This study sought to describe mortality rates and 30-d readmission rates among intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with Gram-negative pneumonia and to explore associated risk factors for mortality and rehospitalization using data from the 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Readmission Database. The study sample included adults age ≥ 18 y who were hospitalized with invasive, continuous mechanical ventilation; were discharged between February 1, 2013, and November 30, 2013; and had a primary or secondary diagnosis of Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. Logistic regression was used to identify subject characteristics significantly associated with mortality and readmissions.

RESULTS

Using the HCUP projected sample of 32,683 intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with Gram-negative pneumonia, the mortality rate during the index hospitalization was 24.3%. More than one fifth of subjects (22.9%) who survived the index hospitalization were readmitted within 30 d of discharge. Among subjects with readmissions, 18% occurred within 3 d of discharge, 39% occurred within 7 d of discharge, and 65% occurred within 14 d of discharge. Subjects with prior hospitalization within 30 d of the index hospitalization had a higher risk of readmission with an odds ratio of 1.70 (95% CI 1.48-1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was high and readmissions were substantial among intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with Gram-negative pneumonia.

Lung cell-specific modulation of LPS-induced TLR4 receptor and adaptor localization

Lung infection by Gram-negative bacteria is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in humans. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), located in the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall, is a highly potent stimulus of immune and structural cells via the TLR4/MD2 complex whose function is sequentially regulated by defined subsets of adaptor proteins. Regulatory mechanisms of lung-specific defense pathways point at the crucial role of resident alveolar macrophages, alveolar epithelial cells, the TLR4 receptor pathway, and lung surfactant in shaping the innate immune response to Gram-negative bacteria and LPS. During the past decade intracellular spatiotemporal localization of TLR4 emerged as a key feature of TLR4 function. Here, we briefly review lung cell type- and compartment-specific mechanisms of LPS-induced TLR4 regulation with a focus on primary resident hematopoietic and structural cells as well as modifying microenvironmental factors involved.