Epidemiology & management of complex ankle fractures in the United Kingdom: A multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patient factors are known to contribute to decision making and treatment of ankle fractures. The presence of poor baseline mobility, diabetes, neuropathy, alcoholism, cognitive impairment, inflammatory arthritis or polytrauma can result in a higher risk of failure or complications. Limited evidence is available on the optimum management for this challenging cohort of patients herein described as complex ankle fractures. This UK multicentre study assessed and evaluated the epidemiology of ankle fractures complicated by significant comorbidity and patient factors and use of specialist surgical techniques such as hindfoot nails (HFN) / tibiotalarcalcaneal (TCC) nails and enhanced open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A UK-wide collaborative study was performed of adult distal AO43/AO44 fractures, associated with 1 or more of the patient factors listed above. Primary outcomes included patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical technique and implants. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and early post-operative weight bearing instructions. Statistical analysis was performed to assess patient and fracture characteristics on outcome, including propensity matching.

RESULTS

One-thousand three hundred and sixty patients, with at least one of the above complex factors, from 56 centres were included with a mean age of 53.1 years. 90.2% (1227) patients underwent primary fixation which included 78.9% (1073) standard open reduction internal fixations (ORIF), 3.25% (43) extended ORIF and 8.1% (111) primary HFN / TCC. Overall wound complications and thromboembolic events were similar in the hindfoot nail group and the ORIF group (11.7% vs 10.7%). Wound complications were greater in diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients independent of fixation method (15.8% vs 9.0%). After propensity matching for comorbidities and fracture type, overall complications were lower in the hindfoot nail (11.8%) and extended ORIF groups (16.7%), than the standard ORIF group (18.6%).

CONCLUSION

Only a minority of complex ankle fractures are treated with specialised techniques (HFN/TCC or extended ORIF). Though more commonly used in older and frail patients their perceived advantages are often negated by a reluctance to bear weight early. These techniques demonstrated a better complication profile to standard ORIF but hindfoot nail with joint preparation for fusion was associated with more complications than hindfoot nail for fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Successful Primary Treatment of Ankle Fractures in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy Using a Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail: A Case Series

Background

Among diabetics, patients with peripheral neuropathy are at increased risk of developing complications following an ankle fracture. While the outcomes in these patients treated nonoperatively have been poor, the outcomes in those undergoing open reduction and internal fixation are at the best modest. We hypothesize that closed reduction and internal fixation with tibiotalocalcaneal nail is an effective primary procedure in this complication prone patient group.

Methods

A retrospective review of diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy who underwent acute treatment of an ankle fracture with closed reduction and internal fixation with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail at two Level 1 trauma centers was performed. 30 patients were identified and divided into 2 groups with respect to their postoperative weight bearing protocol: 20 patients in the early weight bearing (EWB) group and 10 patients in the touch-down weight bearing (TDWB). The primary outcome was the rate of return to baseline function and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of wound dehiscence, wound infection, implant failure, loss of fixation, loss of reduction and amputation.

Results

In the EWB group, 15/20 patients returned to their baseline function, 5/20 had wound dehiscence and infection, 2/20 had implant failure, 5/20 had loss of fixation, 4/20 had loss of reduction, and 4/20 underwent amputation. In the TDWB group, 9/10 patients returned to their baseline function, 1/10 had implant failure, 1/10 had loss of fixation. No patients from this group had loss of reduction or underwent amputation.

Conclusion

Treatment with tibiotalocalcaneal nail is an effective primary procedure in this complication prone group of patients, assuming that weight bearing is delayed for six weeks to protect soft tissues and surgical incisions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Hindfoot nailing for displaced ankle fractures in the elderly: A case-control analysis

INTRODUCTION

Management of fragility ankle fractures in the elderly poses a surgical dilemma. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with screw and plate construct in selected elderly patients who may be significantly frail and comorbid is a tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) or hindfoot nail. Hindfoot nailing potentially reduces the risk of wound infection and increases likelihood of earlier return to function by allowing earlier weightbearing. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes and complications of patients who received a hindfoot nail compared to patients who underwent an ORIF.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients who underwent hindfoot nailing from Jan 2010 to Dec 2021. Patients aged >65-years who underwent ORIF in the same time period were concurrently identified. The patients in the ORIF group were matched with patients in the hindfoot nail group by age, gender, comorbidity according to their Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and their pre-injury function by Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was also collected as part of patient demographics. Outcomes examined include mortality, length of stay, operation time, return to previous mobility, wound complications, metalware failure and infections.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were identified in the hindfoot nail group and matched to 26 patients who underwent ORIF. Mean age was 84 and 83 years in the nail and ORIF group respectively. Overall, there were 12 and 11 complications from the hindfoot nail and ORIF group respectively with seven and two requiring return to theatre in the nail group and ORIF group (P = 0.07). The hindfoot nail group waited an average of 22 days after the operation for weightbearing compared to 59 days in the ORIF group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay (P = 0.58) and operation time (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

Hindfoot nailing was associated with an increased risk of complications and higher risk of return to the operating theatre. Despite the potential attraction of earlier weightbearing, surgeons and patients need to be aware of these potential pitfalls.

Peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails: A systematic literature review and classification system

BACKGROUND

Tibio-talo calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is increasingly performed for hindfoot arthrosis and other indications. Peri-implant fracture around hindfoot fusion nails has been previously reported and can be problematic to treat given multiple surgical considerations including the status of hindfoot arthrodesis at time of fracture. We present a systematic review of the literature regarding peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails and propose a classification system to help guide treatment based on findings from the current literature as well as the collective experience of the senior authors.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify clinical investigations in which peri-implant fractures or other hardware failures were observed as complications following TTC arthrodesis using hindfoot nails. The electronic database of PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library was explored using specific search terms. Inclusion criteria was any clinical investigation that reported on outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot nail in at least one patient. Cadaveric and non-clinical investigations were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were identified which met inclusion criteria and reported clinical outcomes after TTC arthrodesis using a hindfoot fusion nail. Of the 36 studies, there was a total of 13 intraoperative fractures, 43 tibial stress fractures and 24 peri-implant fractures recorded in 12 of the 36 studies.

CONCLUSION

Peri-implant fracture following tibio-talo calcaneal arthrodesis using a hindfoot intramedullary nail is an uncommon but problematic condition to treat. General heterogeneity of patients and indications as well as a lack of descriptive detail in the current literature makes meta-analysis difficult. Given the lack of consensus on treatment, a classification system may be helpful to guide clinical practice.

Hindfoot Fusion Nail with Adjuvant Hybrid External Fixation used as Limb-Salvage Procedure after Failed Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fracture in a Charcot Joint: A Case Report

The failure of the internal fixation of an ankle fracture due to Charcot joint/ neuroarthropathy is rare; such occurred in the case of a 52-year-old woman with uncontrolled diabetes who sustained a right ankle fracture after falling from standing height. The patient was treated with the internal fixation of both malleoli, which procedure failed as the patient progressed, until she eventually was diagnosed with Charcot arthropathy. The post operative images were reviewed and showed a catastrophic fixation failure with a diagnosis of Charcot neuroarthropathy. At that point, we decided to treat the problem presented with salvage arthrodesis, combining hindfoot fusion nail with adjuvant external fixation. This treatment was selected to augment stability and achieve stable fixation. The post-operative visits showed wound healing without complications and painless weight bearing. The follow-up radiographs showed tibiotalar fusion with painless union of the subtalar joint at 48 weeks.

Retrograde Hindfoot Nailing for Acute Trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of retrograde hindfoot nailing in the treatment of acute orthopedic trauma is explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tibio-talar calcaneal (TTC) nailing is an acceptable treatment alternative for the low-demand geriatric patient with peri-articular ankle trauma permitting immediate weight-bearing with low rates of complication and return to functionality. Hindfoot nailing can be used for limb salvage in the younger active patient; yet, joint-preserving reconstruction is preferred when feasible. Retrograde TTC nailing is a reliable option for hindfoot/distal tibia stabilization especially in the elderly frail population. Hindfoot nailing is reserved for a select subset of active patients when severity of bone, joint, and soft tissue injury are not amenable to more conventional reconstruction.

Complications of tibio-talar-calcaneal fusion using intramedullary nails

BACKGROUND

Hindfoot nails are being increasingly used, however significant complications can occur. The purpose of this study was to assess the complications following the use of hindfoot nails at our institution.

METHODS

We identified patients from a retrospective database. All underwent hindfoot nailing under the care of the senior author. Details of complications were recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 52 patients undergoing 55 procedures. Mean follow up was 44.8 months (18-69). Forty patients achieved ankle fusion and 36 subtalar joint fusion. Complications included prominent metalwork in 13 patients, CRPS in five and one peri-prosthetic fracture. Nine developed deep infection, and of these limb salvage was achieved in six patients by removal of metalwork, debridement and insertion of antibiotic loaded cement beads. The remaining three patients underwent below knee amputation.

CONCLUSION

Significant complications can occur, although limb preservation was possible in most cases of deep infection. Hindfoot nailing should be reserved as salvage procedure.