Study on Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Improved Dian Dao San Against Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes)

Purpose

The hyperproliferation of C. acnes has long been regarded as a primary etiological factor in the development of acne vulgaris (AV). Antibiotics targeting C. acnes have been the mainstay in AV treatment. Meanwhile, C. acnes has developed resistance to numerous antibiotics. IDDS, as traditional Chinese medicine, exhibits potent antibacterial activity against C. acnes. However, the mechanism of IDDS against C. acnes remains unclear.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a systematic investigation in vitro to determine the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) and time-kill curves. The MBC and time-kill curves were assessed by quantifying Colony Forming Units countsIn order to establish an in vivo rat ear model of acne, a single intradermal injection of 100μL C. acnes suspension was administered, and oleic acid was applied to the right ear pinna for a duration of 14 days. The intervention involved the utilization of IDDS medications. Additionally, the levels of inflammatory mediators tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were assessed using respective ELISA kits, while Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was employed to visualize the rat ear model. The antimicrobial mechanism was investigated through the analysis of mRNA levels using real-time, quantitative PCR. ELISA analysis was performed according to the protocols outlined for energy metabolism and antioxidant system.

Results

Our research has demonstrated that IDDS possesses antibacterial activity against C. acnes both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms underlying these effects involve energy metabolism and antioxidant systems.

Conclusion

The data has provided further insights into the mechanism of IDDS against C. acnes, which establishes a robust foundation for the clinical application of IDDS.

First Evaluation Switching From Ropivacaine to Highly Concentrated Bupivacaine in Intrathecal Mixtures for Cancer Pain

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal drug delivery is widely used for intractable cancer pain treatment. A combination of drugs with morphine and bupivacaine is recommended in first line therapy. In France, we use ropivacaine 10 mg/mL instead of bupivacaine 5 mg/mL, the only concentration available. Bupivacaine 40 mg/mL has been available in France only since July 2020 under temporary authorization of use.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy by pain assessment, to analyze drug dosage changes, to report adverse events (AEs) and conversion ratios switching from ropivacaine to bupivacaine. Secondary objective was to evaluate costs differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted this retrospective follow-up monocentric study within the Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) Pain Department in Angers, France. We included 14 patients aged 18 years and above, implanted with an Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) for cancer pain treatment and followed up at ICO from July 2020 to February 2021 after switching from ropivacaine to bupivacaine. We used a continuous infusion mode and Bolus could be added through Personal Therapy Manager (PTM).

RESULTS

The median conversion ratio between ropivacaine and bupivacaine was 0.68 (0.65; 0.69) and resulted in no significant change in numeric rating scale evaluation (p = 0.10). We observed moderate and rapidly reversible AEs such as clinical hypotension (29%) and motor block after bolus (21%). The estimated median hospital cost per day was significantly lower (p = 0.05) for the bupivacaine refills than for the last ropivacaine pump refill, decreasing from US$ 61.7 (49.6; 70.5) to US$ 50.4 (45.9; 60.4). The median reimbursement per day from the National Health Insurance (NHI) was three times lower for bupivacaine pump refill when compared to the last ropivacaine pump refill (p < 0.01), decreasing from US$ 179.10 (156.79; 182.91) to US$ 64.59 (59.85; 71.89).

CONCLUSION

Switching from ropivacaine to bupivacaine in IDDS appears more efficacious while remaining just as secure, and at lower cost.

Gabapentin enhances the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine in refractory cancer pain patients

PURPOSE

Morphine infusion through Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) is widely used to relieve refractory cancer pain. However, continuous escalation of morphine dose caused by opioid tolerance and/or progress of cancer was commonly observed. Combining morphine with medications of different analgesic mechanisms is applied to blunt the rate of morphine increase. The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of combining gabapentin with morphine after IDDS implantation.

METHODS

This study compared patients that received IDDS implantation from January 1, 2017 to November 10, 2018 in our institute. Key outcomes included change in mean pain score, dose of morphine used in patients, percentage of patients with 30% and 50% reduction in mean pain score, Patient Global Impression of Change scores, breakthrough pain characters and side effects.

RESULTS

34 patients in the combination group (morphine + gabapentin) and 40 patients in the monotherapy group(morphine)were analyzed. The results showed that both therapy groups achieved similar analgesic efficacy, demonstrated by Numerical rating scale (2.42 ± 0.88 vs 2.57 ± 0.85; Combination vs Monotherapy), PGIC and responder status. Mean daily dose of morphine was significantly lower in combination group compared to monotherapy group (3.54 ± 1.29 mg vs 4.64 ± 1.28 mg, P = 0.007). More patients experienced dizziness and somnolence after receiving combination therapy compared to morphine-alone treatment although no statistical significance was found (P = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

Addition of gabapentin achieved similar analgesic efficacy with lower dose of morphine compared to morphine alone accompanying with higher incidence of dizziness and somnolence.

Malfunctioning sufentanil intrathecal pain pump: a case report

BACKGROUND

Sufentanil is a potent opioid uncommonly used to manage pain and is rarely administered via an intrathecal pain pump system.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case illustrates the use of intrathecal sufentanil in a 50-year-old Caucasian man for the management of chronic pain; however, the intrathecal drug delivery system experienced a malfunction which led to 1/100th output of the correct dosage. Interesting aspects of this case report include the uncommon choice of sufentanil use for an intrathecal drug delivery system, as well as the unusual pharmacokinetics of this drug. Specifically, this patient did not experience the major withdrawal that would be expected given significant under dosing of opioid, and this may be explained by the lipophilicity and context-sensitive half-times of sufentanil.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the absence of a clinically significant withdrawal in this case report, clinicians must be aware of relevant pharmacokinetic properties and unusual intrathecal drug delivery system technologies that influence a patient's response when device malfunction occurs.

Retrospective Analysis of Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Outcomes, Efficacy, and Risk for Cancer-Related Pain at a High Volume Academic Medical Center

OBJECTIVES

Cancer pain is common and difficult to treat, as conservative medical management fails in approximately 20% of patients for reasons such as intolerable side-effects or failure to control pain. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), while underutilized, can be effective tools to treat intractable cancer pain. This study aims to determine the degree of pain relief, efficacy, and safety of patients who underwent IDDS implantation at a multidisciplinary pain clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with an intrathecal pain pump implanted for malignant pain. Charts were reviewed for demographics, cancer type, pain scores before and after implantation, and intrathecal drugs utilized. A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was conducted on the paired differences of pain scores before and after implant. A regression analysis was conducted using a linear model to assess effects of demographic variables on change in pain scores.

RESULTS

160 patients were included in analysis. The median pain score was 7.1 at time of implantation and 5.0 at one-month postimplantation. For patients with both baseline and one-month pain scores available, the median decrease in pain was 2.5 (p < 0.0001). Pain scores three-month postimplantation did not significantly differ from one-month postimplantation. Median longevity was 65 days. Five patients had pumps explanted due to infection with a median time to pump extraction of 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

IDDS has the potential to improve cancer pain in a variety of patients and should be strongly considered as an option for those with cancer pain intractable to conservative medical management.