Comparison of two different assays and the predictive value of allergen components in house dust mite allergy

AIM

In house dust mite (HDM) allergy diagnostics, the IMMULITE, ImmunoCAP and assays for allergen components (nDer p 1 and rDer p 2) are available.

METHODS

Serum sIgE levels were compared and the predictive values for the detection of an early asthmatic response (EAR) were calculated with receiver operating characteristics and a log-logistic regression model.

RESULTS

sIgE levels of IMMULITE and ImmunoCAP were similar (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus [D. pter.] 47.3 ± 35.7 and 42.9 ± 34.4 kU.l^-1; p = 0.23). ImmunoCAP slgEs exhibited similar accuracy in detecting an EAR, area under the curves (AUCs): D. pter. (0.76); Dermatophagoides farinae (0.79); nDer p 1 (0.69); and rDer p 2 (0.72). At low sIgE concentrations (3.5 kU.l^-1), rDer p 2 was more specific and better predicted an EAR (probability rDer p 2: 62%; D. pter.: 19%).

Multisite evaluation of a monoclonal IMMULITE erythropoietin immunoassay

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (EPO) measurements are useful in diagnosing anemias and polycythemias. We conducted a multisite evaluation of a monoclonal IMMULITE® EPO immunoassay.(1) DESIGN AND METHODS: The IMMULITE EPO assay is a solid-phase enzyme-labeled chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Method comparison to the Beckman ACCESS 2 assay using clinically characterized samples and reproducibility studies were conducted at three external independent laboratories. Internal evaluation conducted at Siemens included comparison of IMMULITE® 2000 and IMMULITE® 1000 assays to the ACCESS 2 assay; imprecision; linearity; limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and functional sensitivity; potential interference and cross-reactants; and reference interval determination.

RESULTS

External method comparison gave Deming regression of (IMMULITE 2000)=0.96(ACCESS 2)+2.57IU/L, r=0.98 (n=217). Reproducibility ranged from 6.1% to 16.2%. Internal method comparisons gave Deming regressions of (IMMULITE 2000)=1.09(ACCESS 2)-3.51IU/L, r=0.98 and (IMMULITE 1000)=0.95(ACCESS 2)+0.52IU/L, r=0.95. Total imprecision ranged from 6.4% to 10.3% and linearity was confirmed from 3.5 to 562IU/L. LoB, LoD, and functional sensitivity were 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5IU/L, respectively. The assay was highly specific for EPO. Nonparametric reference interval was 4.3 to 29.0IU/L (n=170).

CONCLUSIONS

The monoclonal IMMULITE EPO assay showed acceptable performance for EPO measurement.

Measurement of Hymenoptera venom specific IgE by the IMMULITE 3gAllergy in subjects with negative or positive results by ImmunoCAP

Background

Patients may receive negative results from a specific IgE (sIgE) test such as the ImmunoCAP (CAP) despite a documented history of systemic reaction to a Hymenoptera sting. Thus, further testing may be required using another serological method or venom skin prick tests to confirm allergy diagnosis and correct species.

Objective

To evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of CAP and IMMULITE 3gAllergy (IMMULITE) for detecting sIgE to Paper wasp (WA) and Yellow Jacket (YJ) venoms using patient clinical history as the comparator.

Methods

Sera from 70 participants with a history of systemic reactions (SR) to WA and/or YJ stings were tested using CAP and IMMULITE. Fifty participants from this group had negative results on CAP. To assess specificity, sera from 71 participants who had never experienced either a WA or YJ sting were tested using CAP and IMMULITE. Fifty participants from this group tested positive using CAP.

Results

In participants with a history of systemic reaction to a Hymenoptera sting, yet who tested negative for WA and/or YJ sIgE according to CAP, the positivity rate according to IMMULITE was 20-42% using 0.10 IU_A/mL as the limit of detection (LoD), per the manufacturer's specification. When the LoD for CAP (0.35 IU_A/mL) was applied to the IMMULITE results, positivity according to IMMULITE was 14-26%. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with SR were greater for IMMULITE than for CAP. For YJ: sensitivity (IMMULITE:CAP), 42.8%:28.5%; specificity, 53.5%:39.4%; agreement, 48.2%:34%. For WA, sensitivity (IMMULITE:CAP), 58.6%:28.5%; specificity, 49.3%:47.8%; agreement, 43.9%:38.3%.

Conclusion

The IMMULITE performed well for detecting sIgE to Hymenoptera venom