1
|
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Saba L, Laird JR, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/stroke risk prevention: A new machine learning framework integrating carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes and its harmonics with conventional risk factors. Indian Heart J 2020; 72:258-264. [PMID: 32861380 PMCID: PMC7474133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Machine learning (ML)-based stroke risk stratification systems have typically focused on conventional risk factors (CRF) (AtheroRisk-conventional). Besides CRF, carotid ultrasound image phenotypes (CUSIP) have shown to be powerful phenotypes risk stratification. This is the first ML study of its kind that integrates CUSIP and CRF for risk stratification (AtheroRisk-integrated) and compares against AtheroRisk-conventional. METHODS Two types of ML-based setups called (i) AtheroRisk-integrated and (ii) AtheroRisk-conventional were developed using random forest (RF) classifiers. AtheroRisk-conventional uses a feature set of 13 CRF such as age, gender, hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood sugar, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), a ratio of TC and HDL, hypertension, smoking, family history, triglyceride, and ultrasound-based carotid plaque score. AtheroRisk-integrated system uses the feature set of 38 features with a combination of 13 CRF and 25 CUSIP features (6 types of current CUSIP, 6 types of 10-year CUSIP, 12 types of quadratic CUSIP (harmonics), and age-adjusted grayscale median). Logistic regression approach was used to select the significant features on which the RF classifier was trained. The performance of both ML systems was evaluated by area-under-the-curve (AUC) statistics computed using a leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. RESULTS Left and right common carotid arteries of 202 Japanese patients were retrospectively examined to obtain 404 ultrasound scans. RF classifier showed higher improvement in AUC (~57%) for leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. Using RF classifier, AUC statistics for AtheroRisk-integrated system was higher (AUC = 0.99,p-value<0.001) compared to AtheroRisk-conventional (AUC = 0.63,p-value<0.001). CONCLUSION The AtheroRisk-integrated ML system outperforms the AtheroRisk-conventional ML system using RF classifier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuadrado-Godia E, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Araki T, Maniruzzaman M, Saba L, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Protogerou A, Sfikakis P, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Ranking of stroke and cardiovascular risk factors for an optimal risk calculator design: Logistic regression approach. Comput Biol Med 2019; 108:182-195. [PMID: 31005010 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CCVRFs) and carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP) are independently associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. In this study, 26 cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors which consisted of a combination of CCVRFs and CUSIP together were ranked. Further, an optimal risk calculator using AtheroEdge composite risk score (AECRS1.0) was designed and benchmarked against seven conventional CV risk (CVR) calculators. METHODS Two types of ranking were performed: (i) ranking of 26 CVR factors and (ii) ranking of eight types of 10-year risk calculators. In the first case, multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratio (OR) and in the second, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the performance of eight types of CVR calculators using SPSS23.0 and MEDCALC12.0 with validation against STATA15.0. RESULTS The left and right common carotid arteries (CCA) of 202 Japanese patients were examined to obtain 404 ultrasound scans. CUSIP ranked in the top 50% of the 26 covariates. Intima-media thickness variability (IMTV) and IMTV10yr were the most influential carotid phenotypes for left CCA (OR = 250, P < 0.0001 and OR = 207, P < 0.0001 respectively) and right CCA (OR = 1614, P < 0.0001 and OR = 626, P < 0.0001 respectively). However, for the mean CCA, AECRS1.0 and AECRS1.010yr reported the most highly significant OR among all the CVR factors (OR = 1.073, P < 0.0001 and OR = 1.104, P < 0.0001). AECRS1.010yr also reported highest area-under-the-curve (AUC = 0.904, P < 0.0001) compared to seven types of conventional calculators. Age and glycated haemoglobin reported highest OR (1.96, P < 0.0001 and 1.05, P = 0.012) among all other CCVRFs. CONCLUSION AECRS1.010yr demonstrated the best performance due to presence of CUSIP and ranked at the first place with highest AUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deep Gupta
- Department of ECE, VNIT, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Tadashi Araki
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Md Maniruzzaman
- Statistics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Cornell Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - Petros Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- Research & Development-Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khanna NN, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Nicolaides A, Araki T, Saba L, Cuadrado-Godia E, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Protogerou A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Performance evaluation of 10-year ultrasound image-based stroke/cardiovascular (CV) risk calculator by comparing against ten conventional CV risk calculators: A diabetic study. Comput Biol Med 2019; 105:125-143. [PMID: 30641308 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
MOTIVATION AtheroEdge Composite Risk Score (AECRS1.010yr) is an integrated stroke/cardiovascular risk calculator that was recently developed and computes the 10-year risk of carotid image phenotypes by integrating conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CCVRFs). It is therefore important to understand how closely AECRS1.010yr is associated with the ten other currently available conventional cardiovascular risk calculators (CCVRCs). METHODS The Institutional Review Board of Toho University approved the examination of the left/right common carotid arteries of 202 Japanese patients. Step 1 consists of measurement of AECRS1.010yr, given current image phenotypes and CCVRFs. Step 2 consists of computing the risk score using ten different CCVRCs given CCVR factors: QRISK3, Framingham Risk Score (FRS), United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) 56, UKPDS60, Reynolds Risk Score (RRS), Pooled cohort Risk Score (PCRS or ASCVD), Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM) calculator, NIPPON, and World Health Organization (WHO) risk. Step 3 consists of computing the closeness factor between AECRS1.010yr and ten CCVRCs using cumulative ranking index derived using eight different statistically derived metrics. RESULTS AECRS1.010yr reported the highest area-under-the-curve (0.927;P < 0.001) among all the risk calculators. The top three CCVRCs closest to AECRS1.010yr were QRISK3, FRS, and UKPDS60 with cumulative ranking scores of 2.1, 3.0, and 3.8, respectively. CONCLUSION AECRS1.010yr produced the largest AUC due to the integration of image-based phenotypes with CCVR factors, and ranked at first place with the highest AUC. Cumulative ranking of ten CCVRCs demonstrated that QRISK3 was the closest calculator to AECRS1.010yr, which is also consistent with the industry trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, VNIT, Nagpur, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, VNIT, Nagpur, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Tadashi Araki
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Aditya Sharma
- Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Neurology Dept., University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Joint Rheumatology Program, National Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|